<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Regional Educational Laboritory What's New</title><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/whatsnew/</link><description>For the latest in events, developments, and updates to the Regional Educational Laboratory Program website, check back here often.</description><language>en-us</language><category>education</category><category>statistics</category><category>data access tools</category><category>libraries</category><category>schools</category><category>colleges</category><item><title>REL Report Examines Effectiveness of a Supplemental Math Tutoring Program on Student Achievement</title><description><![CDATA[To increase the evidence base on remediation in early math, the 2006-2011 REL Southwest at Edvance Research conducted a rigorous experimental study of the impact of the Number Rockets small group tutoring program on grade 1 math achievement.  Number Rockets is an early mathematics intervention targeted to students at risk of falling behind.<br/><br/>
This study, Evaluation of Number Rockets: A Tier-2 Intervention for Grade 1 Students at Risk for Difficulties in Mathematics, found that the Number Rockets intervention had a positive effect on math achievement in grade 1, without having a negative effect on reading achievement.  Comparison students received regular core mathematics instruction but no additional support.<br/><br/>
Specific findings include:
<ul>
<li>Grade 1 students that participated in Number Rockets performed, on average, 7.31 percentile points higher in math achievement than comparison students.</li>
<li>Students who participated in the Number Rockets program scored at the same levels on post tests of letter- and word-reading skills as students who did not participate in the program. Further, "pulling out" students from non-math classes for additional math tutoring did not appear to reduce student achievement in reading.</li>
<li>The effect of the program was seen for all students, regardless of their level of math achievement prior to the program.</li>
<li>Among students who received the Number Rockets intervention, there was no difference in achievement by the number of tutoring sessions provided.</li></ul>

]]></description><pubDate>2/14/2012 8:23:07 AM</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=80</link></item><item><title>REL Report Examines the Title I Supplemental Educational Services Program in the Appalachia Region</title><description><![CDATA[Under the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, students from low-income households are eligible for extra academic assistance if they attend a Title I school that has not made adequate yearly progress for at least three consecutive years. Supplemental educational services usually involve individual or small-group tutoring beyond regular school hours in reading and math. This 2006-2011 REL Appalachia at CNA report, A Descriptive Study of Enrollment in Supplemental Educational Services in the Four REL Appalachia Region States, examines the 2007/08 Title I supplemental educational services program by school locale in the Appalachia Region. The study examines enrollment rates, the number of tutoring hours contracted for and attended, and variation in the type of instruction provided.]]></description><pubDate>2/10/2012 8:49:55 AM</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=241</link></item><item><title>REL Technical Brief Updates Database of Dropout Prevention Programs and Policies in Nine Low-Income Urban School Districts in the Northeast and Islands Region</title><description><![CDATA[Nationally, many public school students fail to graduate from high school.  Those most at risk for not graduating continue to be non-White students living in low-income, urban areas. To learn what dropout prevention programs and policies low-income school districts with high racial/ethnic minority student populations in the Northeast and Islands Region are implementing, (Myint-U. et al. 2009) constructed an interactive database covering nine pilot districts. This REL Northeast and Islands Technical Brief, Updating a Searchable Database of Dropout Prevention Programs and Policies in Nine Low-Income Urban School Districts in the Northeast and Islands Region, builds on the Myint-U. et al. (2009) report, describing updates to the database in 2011 and characteristics of new, discontinued, and sustained programs since 2006/07. ]]></description><pubDate>2/9/2012 9:49:26 AM</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=292</link></item><item><title>REL Report Examines Effectiveness of Success in Sight Program on Student Achievement</title><description><![CDATA[The 2006-2011 REL Central at McREL conducted a randomized control trial of the Success in Sight school improvement intervention in elementary schools in Missouri and Minnesota. Success in Sight is a district-wide intervention designed to help schools, leadership teams, and teachers systematically and systemically engage in continuous school improvement practices to advance the learning of all students. The program focuses on improving data-based decision making, building a purposeful community with a collective belief that the community can achieve its goals, shared leadership, research-based practices, and a cycle of continuous improvement.<br/><br/>
The study included approximately 8,200 students and 1,500 teachers in grades 3 through 5 across 52 schools in 8 school districts. The study found that students who attended schools participating in the Success in Sight intervention had comparable levels of math and reading achievement as students who attended schools that did not participate in the intervention.
 Key results include the following:
<ul><li>Success in Sight did not produce a statistically significant impact on student reading or mathematics achievement after two years of implementation.</li>
<li>Teachers who were in Success in Sight schools reported similar levels of engagement in data-based decision making, purposeful community, and shared leadership as teachers who did not receive the intervention.</li></ul>
]]></description><pubDate>2/8/2012 8:00:00 AM</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=20</link></item><item><title>REL Technical Brief Examines how Prepared Texas Students are for College-Level Reading </title><description><![CDATA[Many students graduate from high school unprepared for the rigorous reading required in entry-level college and career work. This 2006-2011 REL Southwest at Edvance Research Technical Brief, How prepared are subgroups of Texas students for college-level reading? Applying a Lexile-based approach, builds on a recent report (Wilkins et al. 2010) that used the Lexile measure to estimate the proportion of Texas grade 11 public school students in 2009 ready for entry-level college reading in English. The previous study examined the overall grade 11 Texas student population; this brief uses the same methodology but disaggregates the data by student subgroup.]]></description><pubDate>1/31/2012 8:42:06 AM</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=261</link></item><item><title>English Language Proficiency Levels of Limited-English-Proficient Students in Idaho</title><description><![CDATA[This study, English language proficiency levels of limited-English-proficient students in Idaho, examines statewide results on the Idaho English Language Assessment (IELA), the federally mandated annual assessment Idaho administers to all limited-English-proficient (LEP) students. It documents the distribution of LEP students across English proficiency levels on the IELA in 2010 and compares it with results for 2007. It shows how the distribution varied for LEP students by grade spans in listening, speaking, reading, writing, and comprehension. It also compared results across subgroups of LEP students based on gender, participation in the free or reduced-price lunch program, Spanish as the primary language, enrollment in a U.S. public school for the first time in the previous 12 months, migrant status, and enrollment in special education.]]></description><pubDate>1/31/2012 8:41:01 AM</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=290</link></item><item><title>REL Report on the Common Core State Standards in the Southeast Region States</title><description><![CDATA[This study, Plans to adopt and implement Common Core State Standards in the Southeast Region states, produced by the 2006-2011 REL Southeast at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro examines the processes for adopting and implementing the common standards and aligning assessment programs to the common standards in the Southeast Region states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, and South Carolina). The Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort to establish a common set of expectations for what K-12 students are expected to know and be able to do in English language arts and math. The Common Core State Standards were released in June 2010. As of November 2011, 45 states, the District of Columbia, and two territories have adopted the standards and were planning to implement them and align assessments to them. ]]></description><pubDate>1/31/2012 8:40:09 AM</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=291</link></item><item><title>New Five-Year Contracts for Regional Educational Laboratories Began on January 3</title><description><![CDATA[The New Year marked the start of ten new five-year contracts for the Regional Educational Laboratories (RELs). The mission of the REL program is to help states and school districts systematically use research and data to answer important issues of policy and practice with the goal of improving student outcomes.<br/><br/> 
The RELs' research and technical assistance addresses issues of regional importance that often are of national concern, as well.  For example, they will address issues related to improving early childhood education; identifying and retaining effective teachers and principals; adopting and implementing rigorous academic standards and assessments; increasing college readiness, access, and completion; and improving low-achieving schools.<br/><br/>
Each REL will build research capacity and a knowledge base by assisting states, districts, and schools in using their data systems; conducting high quality research and evaluation; providing opportunities for practitioners to learn about the best education research; and helping education policy makers and practitioners incorporate data-based practices into regular decision-making.<br/><br/>
The RELs will carry out these priorities primarily through "research alliances," which are partnerships among practitioners, policy makers, the REL and others to develop a thorough understanding of an education issue of concern.<br/><br/>
The REL regions and 2012-2017 contractors are:<br/><br/>
<ul>
<li>REL Appalachia, operated by CNA (Director: Robert Muller)</li>
<li>REL Central, operated by Marzano Research Laboratory (Director: Robert Marzano)</li>
<li>REL Mid-Atlantic, operated by ICF International (Director: Teresa Duncan)</li>
<li>REL Midwest, operated by Learning Point Associates/American Institutes for Research (Director: Matt Dawson)</li>
<li>REL Northeast, operated by Education Development Center, Inc. (Director: Jill Weber)</li>
<li>REL Northwest, operated by  Education Northwest (Director: Steve Fleischman)</li>
<li>REL Pacific, operated by McREL (Director: Nolan Malone)</li>
<li>REL Southeast, operated by The Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University (Director: Barbara Foorman)</li>
<li>REL West, operated by WestEd (Director: Gary Estes)</ul>
]]></description><pubDate>1/4/2012 10:29:16 AM</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edLabs/regions/</link></item><item><title>REL Northwest Study Examines the 6+1 Trait&amp;#174; Writing Model</title><description><![CDATA[Strong writing skills are important for student success in high school and college and, increasingly, for success in the workplace.  To add to the evidence base on effective strategies for teaching writing in the elementary grades, REL Northwest conducted a rigorous study to test the impact of the 6+1 Trait Writing model on grade 5 writing achievement. The Trait Writing model emphasizes analysis of writing using a set of characteristics, or "traits," of written work, including ideas, organization, voice, word choice, sentence fluency, and conventions. ]]></description><pubDate>12/14/2011 9:20:59 AM</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=52</link></item><item><title>Offering Online Algebra I is an Effective Way to Broaden Access to Algebra for Grade 8 Students</title><description><![CDATA[As schools' technology capacity has increased, online courses have helped to expand curricular offerings, particularly in small schools and rural areas.  To add to the evidence base on the effectiveness of online courses, REL Northeast and Islands conducted a rigorous experimental study of the impact of offering an online Algebra I course to grade 8 students in Maine and Vermont on algebra knowledge and subsequent mathematics course taking patterns. ]]></description><pubDate>12/13/2011 10:16:17 AM</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=231</link></item><item><title>REL Report Examines Grade 8 Reading and Math Proficiency Rates for Native Hawaiian Students and Non-Native Hawaiian Students</title><description><![CDATA[Native Hawaiian students represent the largest single ethnic group in Hawai'i, at 27 percent of the student population in 2008/09. This REL Pacific report, Comparing the achievement patterns of Native Hawaiian and non-Native Hawaiian grade 8 students in reading and math, reports the reading and math proficiency rates of grade 8 Native Hawaiian and non-Native Hawaiian public school students and whether proficiency rates have changed from 2003/04 to 2008/09. ]]></description><pubDate>12/7/2011 10:47:06 AM</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=259</link></item><item><title>Follow-Up Study of Kindergarten Literacy Program Finds that Impacts Observed at the End of Kindergarten are Not Sustained through First Grade  </title><description><![CDATA[A study conducted by REL Southeast has found that the positive impacts of a kindergarten vocabulary intervention (PAVEd for Success [K-PAVE]) were not sustained through first grade.  This study, Effectiveness of a Program to Accelerate Vocabulary Development in Kindergarten (VOCAB): First Grade Follow-up Impact Report and Exploratory Analyses of Kindergarten Impacts, followed up on a 2010 REL Southeast study, which found a statistically significant positive impact at the end of kindergarten on students&#8217; expressive vocabulary and academic knowledge.]]></description><pubDate>12/6/2011 10:13:09 AM</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=289</link></item><item><title>Nutrition and Physical Education Policy and Practice in the Pacific Region</title><description><![CDATA[The report describes the percentage of secondary schools that have adopted policies and practices for student wellness, physical education, food service, and nutrition education across the seven jurisdictions in the Pacific Region. Policies include providing professional development for lead health education teachers, developing strategies to promote healthy eating, forming a health council, and providing or prohibiting certain foods. Practices include requiring nutrition and physical education courses, and assessing physical activity or nutrition, and encouraging family and community involvement in health topics.]]></description><pubDate>11/22/2011</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=258</link></item><item><title>A Descriptive Analysis of State-Supported Formative Assessment Initiatives in New York and Vermont</title><description><![CDATA[This study examines two state-supported formative assessment initiatives that promote a consensus definition of formative assessment endorsed by the Council of Chief State School Officers. It describes the primary components of the two initiatives and the strategies that state, district, and school leaders report using to support implementation of each initiative.]]></description><pubDate>11/22/2011</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=251</link></item><item><title>REL Study Describes High School Acceleration Programs in Florida</title><description><![CDATA[In recent years, there have been renewed efforts to improve the college and career readiness among students and young adults.  States are adopting acceleration programs (advanced-level courses that offer credit toward both a high school diploma and a college degree) to increase students&#8217; academic engagement, better prepare students for the demands of postsecondary education and the job market, and boost college completion rates. ]]></description><pubDate>11/18/2011 8:49:20 AM</pubDate><link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=288</link></item></channel></rss>

