Skip Navigation

National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance


The Enhanced Reading Opportunities Study: Findings from the Second Year of Implementation

NCES 2009-4036
November 2008


Table ES.1.   Impacts on Reading Achievement, Cohort 2 Follow-Up Respondent Sample
 
Outcome ERO Non-ERO Group Estimated Impact   Estimated Impact Effect Size   P-Value for Estimated Impact
All schools               
               
Reading comprehension               
Average standard score  90.1 89.3 0.8 * 0.08 * 0.042
Corresponding grade equivalent  6.1 6.0          
Corresponding percentile  25 23          
               
Reading vocabulary               
Average standard score  93.5 93.5 0.0   0.00   0.986
Corresponding grade equivalent  7.8 7.8          
Corresponding percentile  32 32          
               
Sample size  1,264 907          
               
Reading Apprenticeship Academic Literacy schools               
Reading comprehension               
Average standard score  90.2 88.9 1.4 * 0.14 * 0.015
Corresponding grade equivalent  6.1 5.9          
Corresponding percentile  25 23          
               
Reading vocabulary               
Average standard score  93.4 93.8 -0.4   -0.04   0.428
Corresponding grade equivalent  7.7 7.8          
Corresponding percentile  32 33          
               
Sample size  645 470          
               
Xtreme Reading schools               
               
Reading comprehension               
Average standard score  90.0 89.7 0.2   0.02   0.672
Corresponding grade equivalent  6.1 6.0          
Corresponding percentile  25 24          
               
Reading vocabulary               
Average standard score  93.5 93.1 0.4   0.04   0.468
Corresponding grade equivalent  7.8 7.7          
Corresponding percentile  32 31          
               
Sample size  619 437          
SOURCE: MDRC calculations from the Enhanced Reading Opportunities Study follow-up GRADE assessment.
NOTES: The follow-up GRADE assessment was administered in the spring of 2007 near the end of students’ ninth-grade year. The estimated impacts are regression-adjusted using ordinary least squares, controlling for blocking of random assignment by school and for random differences between the ERO and non-ERO groups in their baseline reading comprehension test scores and age at random assignment. The values in the column labeled “ERO Group” are the observed means for students randomly assigned to the ERO group. The “Non-ERO Group” values in the next column are the regression-adjusted means for students randomly assigned to the non-ERO group, using the observed mean covariate values for the ERO group as the basis for the adjustment. The national average for standard score values is 100, and its standard deviation is 15. The grade equivalent and percentile are those associated with the average standard score as indicated in the GRADE Teacher's Scoring and Interpretive Manual (Level H, Grade 9, Spring Testing, Form B). No statistical tests or arithmetic operations were performed on these reference points. The estimated impact effect size is calculated as a proportion of the standard deviation of the non-ERO group average (reading comprehension = 10.035; reading vocabulary = 9.827). A two-tailed t-test was applied to the impact estimate. The statistical significance is indicated (*) when the p-value is less than or equal to 5 percent. Rounding may cause slight discrepancies in calculating sums and differences.