|
|
References
Met WWC evidence standards
Torgesen, J., Myers, D., Schirm, A., Stuart, E., Vartivarian, S., Mansfield, W., et al. (2006). National assessment of Title I interim report—Volume II: Closing the reading gap: First year findings from a randomized trial of four reading interventions for striving readers. Retrieved from Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education Web site: http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/disadv/title1interimreport/index.html
Did not meet WWC evidence screens
Arthur, C. (1988). Progress in a high school LD class. ADI News, 27 (4), 17–18. 1
Byron, D. (1988). Corrective Reading in a comprehensive school: The Hartcliffe Project. Educational and Child Psychology, 5 (4), 35–41. 2
Campbell, M. L. (1984). Corrective Reading program evaluated with secondary students in San Diego. ADI News, 3, 3. 1
Department of Accountability and Organizational Evaluation. (2002). Evaluation of the 2001–02 Corrective Reading program. Retrieved from San Juan Unified School District Web site: http://www.sanjuan.edu/accountability/program- evaluations/corrective-reading-2002.pdf 1
Drakeford, W. (2002). The impact of an intensive program to increase the literacy skills of incarcerated youth. Journal of Correctional Education, 53 (4), 139–144. 1
Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., & Biglan, A. (2005). Fostering the development of reading skill through supplemental instruction: Results for Hispanic and Non-Hispanic students. Journal of Special Education, 39 (2), 66–85. 3
Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., Biglan, A. & Black, C. (2005). Supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and Non-Hispanic students in early elementary school: A follow-up. Journal of Special Education, 36 (2), 69–80. 3
Additional source:
Gunn, B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., & Ary, D. (2000). The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. Journal of Special Education, 34 (2), 90–103.
Harris, R. E., Marchand-Martella, N. E., Martella, R. C. (2000). Effects of a peer-delivered Corrective Reading program. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 21–36. 1
Hempenstall, K. J. (1997). The effects on the phonological processing skills of disabled readers participating in Direct Instruction reading programs. Unpublished doctoral dissera tation, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4
Herr, C. M. (1989). Using Corrective Reading with adults. ADI News, 8 (2), 18–21. 1
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (4), 437–447. 2
Keel, M. C., Federick, L. D., Hughes, T. A., & Owens, S. H. (1999). Using paraprofessionals to deliver Direct Instruction reading programs. Effective School Practices, 18 (2), 16–22. 2
Malmgren, K. W., & Leone, P. E. (2000). Effects of a short-term auxiliary reading program on the reading skills of incarcerated youth. Education & Treatment of Children, 23, 239–247. 1
Marchand-Martella, N. E., & Martella, R. C. (2002). An overview and research summary of peer-delivered Corrective Reading instruction. Behavior Analysis Today, 3, 213–220. 1
Marchand-Martella, N. E., Martella, R. C., Bettis, D. F., & Riley Blakely, M. (2004). Project Pals: A description of a high school-based tutorial program using Corrective Reading and peer-delivered instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 20, 179–201. 1
Marchand-Martella, N. E., Martella, R. C., Orlob, M., & Ebey, T. (2000). Conducting action research in a rural high school setting using peers as Corrective Reading instructors for students with disabilities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 19 (2), 20–29. 1
Polloway, E. A., Epstein, M. H., Polloway, C. H., Patton, J. R., & Ball, D. W. (1986). Corrective Reading program: An analysis of effectiveness with learning disabled and mentally retarded students. Remedial and Special Education, 7 (4), 41–47. 1
Scarlato, M. C., & Asahara, E. (2004). Effects of Corrective Reading in a residential treatment facility for adjudicated youth. Journal of Direct Instruction, 4, 211–217. 1
Short, C., Marchand-Martella, N. E., Martella, R. C., & Ebey, T. L. (1999). The benefits of being high school Corrective Reading peer instructors. Effective School Practices, 18 (2), 23–29. 1
Slaton, D. (2006). Effects of Corrective Reading on the reading abilities and classroom behaviors of middle school students with reading deficits and challenging behavior. Behavioral Disorders 31 (3), 265–283. 1
Sommers, J. (1995). Seven-year overview of Direct Instruction programs used in basic skills classes at Big Piney Middle School. Effective School Practices, 14 (4), 29–32. 1
Somerville, D. E., & Leach, D. J. (1988, February). Direct or indirect instruction: An evaluation of three types of intervention programs for assisting students with specific reading difficulties. Educational Research, 30 (1), 46–53. 1
Steventon, C. E., & Frederick, L. D. (2003). The effects of repeated readings on student performance in the Corrective Reading program. Journal of Direct Instruction, 3 (1), 17–27. 1
Vitale, M., Medland, M., Romance, N., & Weaver, H. P. (1993). Accelerating reading and thinking skills of low-achieving elementary students: Implications for curricular change. Effective School Practices, 12 (1), 26–31. 1
Disposition Pending
Flores, M. M., Shippen, M. E., Alberto, P., & Crowe, L. (2004). Teaching letter-sound correspondence to students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Journal of Direct Instruction, 4, 173–188. 5
2 Does not use a strong causal design: this study did not use a comparison group.
3 Does not use a causal design: this study, which used a randomized controlled trial design, combined two interventions and therefore the effects of Corrective Reading could not be isolated.
4 The sample is not appropriate to this review: the parameters for this WWC review specified that students should be in grades K–3; this study did not disaggregate students in the eligible range from those outside the range.
5 The disposition is pending development of WWC evidence standards for single subject designs.
