References

Studies that fall outside the Dropout Prevention protocol or do not meet evidence standards:

Brand, B. (2005). Enhancing high school reform: Lessons from site visits to four cities. Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum. The study is ineligible for review because it does not examine the effectiveness of an intervention.

Foley, E. M., Klinge, A., & Reisner, R. (2007, revised 2008). Evaluation of New Century High Schools: Profile of an initiative to create and sustain small, successful high schools. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates, Inc. The study does not meet WWC evidence standards because the intervention and comparison groups are not shown to be equivalent at baseline.

Galiatsos, S. (2007). Reforming high schools. New York, NY: New Visions for Public Schools. The study is ineligible for review because it does not use a comparison group.

Hirota, J.M. (2005). Reframing education: The partnerships strategy and public schools. New York, NY: Youth Development Institute, Fund for the City of New York with the assistance of New Visions for Public Schools. The study is ineligible for review because it does not examine the effectiveness of an intervention.

Huebner, T. A. (2005). Rethinking high school: An introduction to New York City’s experience. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. The study does not meet WWC evidence standards because the intervention and comparison groups are not shown to be equivalent at baseline.

Huebner, T. A., Calisi Corbett, G., & Phillippo, K. (2006). Rethinking high school; Inaugural graduations at New York City’s new high schools. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. The study does not meet WWC evidence standards because the intervention and comparison groups are not shown to be equivalent at baseline.

Melcher, M. (2006). New Century High Schools and the small schools movement in New York City. New York, NY: New Visions for Public Schools. The study is ineligible for review because it does not examine the effectiveness of an intervention.

New Visions for Public Schools with L. Kurgan. (2005). From large school buildings to small school campuses: Orchestrating the shift. New York, NY: New Visions for Public Schools.The study is ineligible for review because it does not examine the effectiveness of an intervention.

Policy Studies Associates. (2006). Evaluation of the New Century High Schools Initiative: Report on the third year. Washington, DC. The study does not meet WWC evidence standards because it only includes outcomes that are overaligned with the intervention or measured in a way that is inconsistent with the protocol.

Reisner, E. R., Rubenstein, M. C., Johnson, M. L., & Fabiano, L. (2003). Evaluation of the New Century High Schools Initiative: Report on program implementation in the first year. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates, Inc. The study is ineligible for review because it does not examine the effectiveness of an intervention.

Rubenstein, M. C., Reisner, E. R., Coon, M. J., & Fabiano, L. (2005). New Century High Schools: Evaluation findings from the second year. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates, Inc. The study is ineligible for review because it does not include an outcome within a domain specified by the protocol.

Theroux, K. (2007). Small schools in the big city: Promising results validate reform efforts in New York City high schools. Carnegie Reporter, 4(3). New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York. The study is ineligible for review because it does not examine the effectiveness of an intervention.

Top