Skip Navigation

What Works Clearinghouse


Effectiveness


Findings

The WWC review of interventions for dropout prevention addresses student outcomes in three domains: staying in school, progressing in school, and completing school. For Kemple, Herlihy, & Smith (2005), WWC assessed outcomes only in the progressing in school domain. 4

Progressing in school. Kemple, Herlihy, & Smith (2005) found that students using Talent Development High Schools earned an average of 9.5 course credits over the first two years of high school, while comparison group students earned 8.6 course credits. In addition, Talent Development High Schools students were more likely to be promoted to tenth grade than comparison students (68% vs. 60%). 5 Both differences were statistically significant.

Rating of effectiveness

The WWC rates the effects of an intervention in a given outcome domain as positive, potentially positive, mixed, no discernible effects, potentially negative, or negative. The rating of effectiveness takes into account four factors: the quality of the research design, the statistical significance of the findings,6 the size of the difference between participants in the intervention and the comparison conditions, and the consistency in findings across studies (see the WWC Intervention Rating Scheme).

4 The study also examined outcomes in the staying in school and completing school domains. However, these analyses did not meet WWC standards. Please see Appendix A1 for details.
5 These comparison group means were not directly reported by Kemple, Herlihy, & Smith (2005) and were obtained by a simple transformation of the results provided in the report. See the WWC Talent Development High Schools Technical Appendices for more details.
6 The level of statistical significance was reported by the study authors or, where necessary, calculated by the WWC to correct for clustering within classrooms or schools and for multiple comparisons. For an explanation, see the WWC Tutorial on Mismatch. See Technical Details of WWC-Conducted Computations for the formulas the WWC used to calculate the statistical significance. In the case of Kemple, Herlihy, & Smith (2005), the study authors had corrected for clustering, so no additional corrections were required. The WWC did, however, correct the statistical significance levels for multiple comparisons.

PO Box 2393
Princeton, NJ 08543-2393
Phone: 1-866-503-6114