Skip Navigation

What Works Clearinghouse


Effectiveness


Findings

The WWC review of elementary school mathematics curriculum-based interventions addresses student outcomes in mathematics achievement.

Mathematics achievement. Johnson and Hall (2003) reported significant, positive effects for Houghton Mifflin Mathematics on overall mathematics achievement for grades 2-5. Because the authors presented average school-level math achievement gains and pretest scores but no posttest scores, the WWC requested school-level average posttest scores from the authors. 3 Using the school-level data provided by the authors, and after accounting for clustering,4 the WWC determined that the effect of Houghton Mifflin Mathematics on math achievement was neither statistically significant nor substantively important, according to WWC criteria. Thus the WWC categorized the effect of Houghton Mifflin Mathematics on mathematics achievement as indeterminate.

The EDSTAR, Inc. (2004) study used a series of comparisons between a single treatment district and a single comparison district. This analysis does not allow the effect of the intervention to be disentangled from the effect of other district characteristics. As a result, the WWC requested that the authors aggregate the data in each of the three states that included multiple treatment districts and multiple comparison districts. 5 This reanalysis eliminated the confound between intervention effects and district effects. Using school-level data provided to the WWC by the authors for the three states that had multiple districts in the intervention and comparison groups and accounting for clustering,4 the WWC determined that the effect of Houghton Mifflin Mathematics on mathematics achievement was neither statistically significant nor substantively important, according to WWC criteria. Thus the WWC categorized the effect of Houghton Mifflin Mathematics on mathematics achievement as indeterminate.

Rating of effectiveness

The WWC rates the effects of an intervention in a given outcome domain as positive, potentially positive, mixed, no discernible effects, potentially negative, or negative. The rating of effectiveness takes into account four factors: the quality of the research design, the statistical significance of the findings (as calculated by the WWC4 ), the size of the difference between participants in the intervention condition and the comparison condition, and the consistency in findings across studies (see the WWC Intervention Rating Scheme). The WWC found Houghton Miffin to have no discernible effects for mathematics achievement.

3 For details about the information the WWC uses for its calculations, see Technical Details of WWC-Conducted Computations.
4 The level of statistical significance was reported by the study authors or, where necessary, calculated by the WWC to correct for clustering within classrooms or schools and for multiple comparisons. For an explanation, see the WWC Tutorial on Mismatch. See Technical Details of WWC-Conducted Computations for the formulas the WWC used to calculate the statistical significance. In the case of Houghton Mifflin Mathematics, a correction for clustering
was needed.
5 This analysis focuses on data where there was more than one district pair per state and, within the state, more than one district pair per type of comparison condition. For example, two California district pairs had comparison districts that used the balanced curriculum, so those district pairs were included in the analysis. But only one district pair in California had a comparison district using the reform curriculum, so the intervention and comparison districts in that pair were excluded from analysis. The reduced sample did not include any comparison districts using a traditional math curriculum.

Top


PO Box 2393
Princeton, NJ 08543-2393
Phone: 1-866-503-6114