Overview1
Program Description2
Saxon Math is a textbook series covering grades K–12 based on incremental development and continual review of mathematical concepts to give students time to learn and practice concepts throughout the year. The series is aligned with standards of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) and various states, and can be adapted for special education students in inclusion classrooms, pullout programs, or self-contained resource classrooms. Although content differs by course, the incremental, distributed approach of Saxon Math is the same, with mathematical concepts presented in a series of short “lessons” intended to gradually build understanding and previously-taught concepts practiced and assessed throughout the course. Developed in the early 1980s, Saxon Math included four middle school math textbooks used in the studies included in this intervention report. The series has been redesigned and now offers three textbooks for middle school grades. This report includes studies that investigate the potential impact of Saxon Math texts on math achievement of middle school students but does not include these revised texts.
Research3
One study of Saxon Math meets What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) evidence standards, and four studies meet WWC evidence standards with reservations. The five studies included over 6,500 students from grades 6 to 8 in 52 schools in four states.4
Based on these five studies, the WWC considers the extent of evidence for Saxon Math to be medium to large for math achievement.
Effectiveness
Saxon Math was found to have mixed effects on math achievement.
| |
Math achievement |
| Rating of effectiveness |
Mixed effects |
| Improvement index5 |
Average: +9 percentile points
Range: +6 to +16 percentile points |
| |
1 This report has been updated from the previous version (posted April 9, 2007) to include reviews of five studies that have been released since 2005. A complete list and disposition of all studies reviewed is provided in the references. One study that met evidence standards (Williams, 1986), which was included in the previous version of this report, is now eligible for review as part of the WWC high school math area. (The protocol for the middle school math topic area was revised to narrow the scope from examining all students in grades 6 to 9 to examining only those students who are attending middle schools or junior high schools. Studies examining students in grade 9 who are attending high school are included in the high school math topic area.) Additionally, two studies included in the previous version do not meet evidence standards: Resendez and Manley (2005) does not meet evidence standards because the groups were not shown to be equivalent at baseline; Roberts (1994) does not meet evidence standards because the WWC views the district as the unit of assignment in the study, thus, there was only one unit of assignment in each condition.
2 The descriptive information for this program was obtained from publicly available sources: the program’s website (
http://saxonpublishers.hmhco.com, downloaded December 2008), and directly from the authors in the case of Resendez and Azin (2006). The WWC requests developers to review the program description sections for accuracy from their perspective. Further verification of the accuracy of the descriptive information for this program is beyond the scope of this review. The literature search reflects documents publicly available by August 2008.
3 The studies in this report were reviewed using WWC Evidence Standards, Version 1.0 (see the
WWC Standards).
4 The evidence presented in this report is based on available research. Findings and conclusions may change as new research becomes available.
5 These numbers show the average and range of student-level improvement indices for all findings across the studies.