- Publications
- Research Programs
- R & D Centers
- Center for Response to Intervention in Early Childhood
- National Research and Development Center on Serious Behavior Disorders at the Secondary Level
- National Research and Development Center on Improving Mathematics Instruction for Students with Mathematics Difficulties
- National Research and Development Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education
- Funding Opportunities
- News & Events
- About Us
List of TablesTable D-24a. Number and percentage of states that used oversampling for one or more categories: School year 2004-05
| Response options | Percent of | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of states | All states [N=51] | States that used stratified random sampling [n=38] | ||||||||||
| Did not use stratified random sampling1 | 13 | 25 | ‡ | |||||||||
| Used oversampling | 13 | 25 | 34 | |||||||||
| Did not use oversampling | 25 | 49 | 66 | |||||||||
|
‡ Not applicable. 1 In addition to other types of sampling, this includes child records not reviewed and nonresponse. NOTE: Percentages may not sum to totals because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, Evaluation of States' Monitoring and Improvement Practices Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part B Monitoring Evaluation Questionnaire. |
||||||||||||