Skip Navigation

National Center for Special Education Research


Characteristics of States Monitoring and Improvement Practices
NCSER 2008-3008
October 2007

Table D-4.  Number and percentage of states using various methods to select focus areas for monitoring and improvement planning, by method of selection: School year 2004-05

Method of selection Percent of
Number of states All states [N=51] States using focus areas [n=44]
Did not use focus areas 7 14
Analyzed Section 618 data 33 65 75
Compiled/analyzed dispute resolution data 21 41 48
Analyzed assessment results 26 51 59
Analyzed AYP subgroup data 16 31 36
Analyzed results from recent LEA monitoring 25 49 57
Analyzed LEA applications for funds 9 18 20
Analyzed LEA self-assessments 21 41 48
Analyzed LEA policies/procedures 13 25 30
Analyzed findings from stakeholder surveys 7 14 16
Consulted with/followed recommendations of OSEP staff 18 35 41
Consulted with/followed recommendations of state-level committee 20 39 45
Consulted with/followed recommendations of an advisory group 24 47 55
Used other methods 10 20 23
Not applicable.
NOTE: States could select more than one method, therefore, the Percent columns will not sum to 100.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, Evaluation of States' Monitoring and Improvement Practices Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part B Monitoring Evaluation Questionnaire.