Skip Navigation

National Center for Special Education Research


Characteristics of States Monitoring and Improvement Practices
NCSER 2008-3008
October 2007

Table E-10.  Number and percentage of states using various methods to select focus areas for monitoring and improvement planning, by method of selection: 2004-05

Method of selection Percent of
Number of states All states [N=51] States using focus areas [n=38]
Did not use focus areas 13 25
Analyzed Section 618 data 23 45 61
Compiled/analyzed dispute resolution data 11 22 29
Analyzed findings from recent monitoring unit monitoring 22 43 58
Analyzed monitoring unit applications for funds 9 18 24
Analyzed monitoring unit self-assessments 15 29 39
Analyzed monitoring unit policies/procedures 12 24 32
Analyzed findings from stakeholder surveys 12 24 32
Consulted with/followed recommendations of OSEP staff 16 31 42
Consulted with/followed recommendations of state-level steering committee 21 41 55
Consulted with/followed recommendations of an advisory group 15 29 39
Analyzed areas related to Federal reporting requirements1 6 12 16
Used other methods 15 29 39
Not applicable.
1 This category did not appear in the questionnaire. It was constructed from other state specific responses.
NOTE: States could select more than one focus area, therefore, the Percent column will not sum to 100.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, Evaluation of States' Monitoring and Improvement Practices Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part C Monitoring Evaluation Questionnaire.