- Publications
- Research Programs
- R & D Centers
- Center for Response to Intervention in Early Childhood
- National Research and Development Center on Serious Behavior Disorders at the Secondary Level
- National Research and Development Center on Improving Mathematics Instruction for Students with Mathematics Difficulties
- National Research and Development Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education
- Funding Opportunities
- News & Events
- About Us
List of TablesTable E-19. Number and percentage of states that identified local systemic noncompliance, by method used: 2004-05
| Method | Percent of | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of states | All states [N=51] | States using focus areas [n=43] | ||||||||||
| Did not identify local noncompliance | ‡ | |||||||||||
| Analyzed quantitative child outcomes data | 13 | 25 | 30 | |||||||||
| Analyzed monitoring unit self-assessments | 20 | 39 | 47 | |||||||||
| Used survey of parents from monitoring unit | 22 | 43 | 51 | |||||||||
| Used survey of other stakeholders from monitoring unit | 13 | 25 | 30 | |||||||||
| Analyzed qualitative data collecting during monitoring unit monitoring | 27 | 53 | 63 | |||||||||
| Used record reviews during monitoring unit monitoring | 40 | 78 | 93 | |||||||||
| Used systemic review of dispute resolution data | 22 | 43 | 51 | |||||||||
| Used review of data from statewide database1 | 5 | 12 | 10 | |||||||||
| Used other methods | 11 | 22 | 26 | |||||||||
|
‡ Not applicable. 1 This category did not appear in the questionnaire. It was constructed from other state specific responses. NOTE: States could select more than one method, therefore, the Percent columns will not sum to 100. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, Evaluation of States' Monitoring and Improvement Practices Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part C Monitoring Evaluation Questionnaire. |
||||||||||||