Table E-20. Number and percentage of states using various procedures to select monitoring units for monitoring: 2004-05
| Procedures | Number of states | Percent of all states [N=51] | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monitored all monitoring units each year | 20 | 39 | ||||||||||
| Used regular cycle to select monitoring units | 19 | 37 | ||||||||||
| Used cycle to select monitoring units, but cycle was not regular; frequency of monitoring for each monitoring unit determined by prior compliance or performance | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||
| Used prior compliance or performance alone to select monitoring units | 3 | 6 | ||||||||||
| Used a cycle to select some monitoring units; others selected based on prior compliance or performance | 6 | 12 | ||||||||||
| Monitoring occurred at two levels; different procedures used at each level | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||
|
NOTE: Percentages may not sum to totals because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, Evaluation of States' Monitoring and Improvement Practices Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part C Monitoring Evaluation Questionnaire. |
||||||||||||