- Publications
- Research Programs
- R & D Centers
- Center for Response to Intervention in Early Childhood
- National Research and Development Center on Serious Behavior Disorders at the Secondary Level
- National Research and Development Center on Improving Mathematics Instruction for Students with Mathematics Difficulties
- National Research and Development Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education
- Funding Opportunities
- News & Events
- About Us
List of TablesTable E-22. Number and percentage of states that used various compliance or performance criteria to select monitoring units for monitoring, by selection criteria: 2004-05
| Selection criteria | Percent of | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of states | All states [N=51] | States that used prior compliance/performance [n=11] | ||||||||||
| Did not use prior compliance/performance | 40 | 78 | ‡ | |||||||||
| Process and procedural requirements | 9 | 18 | 82 | |||||||||
| Provision of child/family services | 10 | 20 | 91 | |||||||||
| Child/family outcomes data | 3 | 6 | 27 | |||||||||
| Dispute resolution data | 5 | 10 | 45 | |||||||||
| State designated focus areas | 7 | 14 | 64 | |||||||||
| Other selection criteria | 5 | 10 | 45 | |||||||||
|
‡ Not applicable. NOTE: States could select more than one selection criterion, therefore, the Percent columns will not sum to 100. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, Evaluation of States' Monitoring and Improvement Practices Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part C Monitoring Evaluation Questionnaire. |
||||||||||||