Skip Navigation

National Center for Special Education Research


Characteristics of States Monitoring and Improvement Practices
NCSER 2008-3008
October 2007

Table E-33.  Number and percentage of states using various data sources when monitoring monitoring units or planning improvements, by data source and frequency of use: 2004-05

Data source frequency Number of states Percent of all states [N=51]
Parent survey
Never 6 12
Rarely 10 20
Usually 8 16
Always 26 51
Parent interviews or focus groups
Never 6 12
Rarely 13 25
Usually 10 20
Always 22 43
Early intervention specialist survey
Never 24 47
Rarely 10 20
Usually 7 14
Always 7 14
Early intervention specialist interviews or focus groups
Never 16 31
Rarely 9 18
Usually 10 20
Always 16 31
Advocate survey
Never 39 76
Rarely 8 16
Usually 2 4
Always 0 0
Advocate interviews or focus groups
Never 33 65
Rarely 9 18
Usually 3 6
Always 4 8
Site-based administrator (local program director) survey
Never 25 49
Rarely 7 14
Usually 6 12
Always 11 22
Site-based administrator (local program director) interviews or focus groups
Never 8 16
Rarely 5 10
Usually 7 14
Always 30 59
Monitoring unit self-assessment reports
Never 10 20
Rarely 4 8
Usually 11 22
Always 26 51
Public hearings
Never 33 65
Rarely 10 20
Usually 4 8
Always 1 2
Review of child folders, including review of IFSPs
Never 0 0
Rarely 1 2
Usually 2 4
Always 48 94
Review of dispute resolution data
Never 6 12
Rarely 6 12
Usually 7 14
Always 32 63
Review of placement rate data
Never 15 29
Rarely 4 8
Usually 10 20
Always 22 43
Review of child assessment data
Never 8 16
Rarely 1 2
Usually 9 18
Always 33 65
Other data sources
Never 33 65
Rarely 0 0
Usually 2 4
Always 16 31
NOTE: Percentages may not sum to totals because of rounding.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, Evaluation of States' Monitoring and Improvement Practices Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part C Monitoring Evaluation Questionnaire.