Skip Navigation

National Center for Special Education Research


Characteristics of States Monitoring and Improvement Practices
NCSER 2008-3008
October 2007

Table E-44.  Number and percentage of states that analyzed dispute resolution data to determine whether local systemic noncompliance had occurred: 2004-05

Response options Number of states Percent of all states [N=51]
Analyzed dispute resolution data 31 61
Did not analyze dispute resolution data 18 35
Not enough data to analyze1 2 4
1 This category did not appear in the questionnaire. It was constructed from other state specific responses.
NOTE: Percentages may not sum to totals because of rounding.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, Evaluation of States' Monitoring and Improvement Practices Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part C Monitoring Evaluation Questionnaire.