Skip Navigation

National Center for Special Education Research


Characteristics of States Monitoring and Improvement Practices
NCSER 2008-3008
October 2007

Table E-57c.  Number and percentage of states with various types of individuals participating in local improvement planning or implementation, by type of individual: 2004-05

Type of individual Number of states Percent of all states [N=51]
Staff from the state lead agency 44 86
Staff from the SEA (if not the state lead agency) 13 25
Staff from other state agencies (except Part C state lead agency) 16 31
Parents of children with disabilities 26 51
Advocates for persons with disabilities 13 25
Early intervention specialists 26 51
Related service lead agencies 12 23
Part C local program directors 31 61
Representatives of professional organizations or associations 10 20
Representatives from Health Department 21 41
Representatives from Maternal and Child Health 15 29
Representatives from Medicaid 12 24
Representatives from Head Start 17 33
Representatives from Child Care 14 27
Representatives from Child Welfare 16 31
Representatives from Mental Health 15 29
Representatives from Developmental Disabilities 14 27
Outside consultants 10 20
Higher education faculty1 1 2
Other type of individual 7 14
1 This category did not appear in the questionnaire. It was constructed from other state specific responses.
NOTE: States could select more than one type of individual, therefore, the Percent column will not sum to 100.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, Evaluation of States' Monitoring and Improvement Practices Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part C Monitoring Evaluation Questionnaire.