Table E-6. Number and percentage of states that focused monitoring activities on additional levels other than the monitoring unit, by additional level of focus: 2004-05
| Level of focus | Number of states | Percent of all states [N=51] | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State agencies other than state lead agency | 9 | 18 | ||||||||||
| Regional public agencies | 6 | 12 | ||||||||||
| Local public agencies | 10 | 20 | ||||||||||
| Private vendors | 15 | 29 | ||||||||||
| Private individuals providing services under fee-forservice system | 9 | 18 | ||||||||||
| Other level of focus | 6 | 12 | ||||||||||
| State did not focus on additional levels | 24 | 47 | ||||||||||
|
NOTE: States could select more than one additional level, therefore, the Percent column will not sum to 100. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, Evaluation of States' Monitoring and Improvement Practices Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part C Monitoring Evaluation Questionnaire. |
||||||||||||