Skip Navigation

National Center for Special Education Research


Characteristics of States Monitoring and Improvement Practices
NCSER 2008-3008
October 2007

Table E-75b.  Number and percentage of states taking various actions in support of improvement activities, by type and frequency of action: 2004-05

Type and frequency of action Number of states Percent of all states [N=51]
Provided additional funds to the monitoring unit
Never 27 53
Occasionally 20 39
Usually 3 6
Always 1 2
Provided professional development or training for monitoring unit personnel
Never 1 2
Occasionally 17 33
Usually 22 43
Always 11 22
Provided technical assistance to monitoring personnel
Never 2 4
Occasionally 1 2
Usually 19 37
Always 29 57
Conducted additional data collection and analysis
Never 6 12
Occasionally 25 49
Usually 11 22
Always 8 16
Conducted follow-up site visits or desk audits
Never 8 16
Occasionally 16 31
Usually 11 22
Always 16 31
Prepared additional reports
Never 10 20
Occasionally 27 53
Usually 7 14
Always 6 12
Facilitated interagency communication
Never 11 22
Occasionally 15 29
Usually 16 31
Always 9 18
Other action taken
Never 50 98
Occasionally 1 2
Usually 0 0
Always 0 0
NOTE: Percentages may not sum to totals because of rounding.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, Evaluation of States' Monitoring and Improvement Practices Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part C Monitoring Evaluation Questionnaire.