- Publications
- Research Programs
- Accelerating the Academic Achievement of Students with Learning Disabilities Research Initiative
- Autism Spectrum Disorders
- Cognition and Student Learning in Special Education
- Early Intervention and Early Learning in Special Education
- Families of Children with Disabilities
- Mathematics and Science Education: Special Education Research
- Professional Development for Teachers and Related Services Providers
- Reading, Writing, and Language Development
- Research Training Program in Special Education: Early Career Development and Mentoring
- Research Training Program in Special Education: Postdoctoral Research Training
- Small Business Innovation Research in Special Education
- R & D Centers
- Center for Response to Intervention in Early Childhood
- National Research and Development Center on Serious Behavior Disorders at the Secondary Level
- National Research and Development Center on Improving Mathematics Instruction for Students with Mathematics Difficulties
- National Research and Development Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education
- Funding Opportunities
- News & Events
- About Us
List of TablesTable E-79. Number and percentage of states using specific types of analyses when examining the relationship between monitoring unit compliance and child/family outcomes, by type of analysis used: 2004-05
| Type of analysis | Percent of | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of states | All states [N=51] | States that examined relationship [n=12] | ||||||||||
| Did not examine relationship between compliance and outcomes | 39 | 76 | ‡ | |||||||||
| Cross-sectional analysis comparing compliance and outcome data across monitoring units at a single point in time | 4 | 8 | 33 | |||||||||
| Longitudinal comparing compliance and outcome data over time within a monitoring unit | 1 | 2 | 8 | |||||||||
| Qualitative analysis that used expert informants to provide evidence of link between compliance and outcomes within a monitoring unit | 3 | 6 | 25 | |||||||||
| Informal analysis based on state staff judgment | 6 | 12 | 50 | |||||||||
| Other analysis used | 1 | 2 | 8 | |||||||||
|
‡ Not applicable. NOTE: States could select more than one type of analysis, therefore, the Percent columns will not sum to 100. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, Evaluation of States' Monitoring and Improvement Practices Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part C Monitoring Evaluation Questionnaire. |
||||||||||||