Skip Navigation

National Center for Special Education Research


Characteristics of States Monitoring and Improvement Practices
NCSER 2008-3008
October 2007

Table E-9.  Number and percentage of states using specific focus areas for monitoring and improvement planning, by focus area: 2004-05

Focus area Percent of
Number of states All states [N=51] States using focus areas [n=38]
Did not use focus areas 13 25
Participation rate 14 27 37
Child find 29 57 76
Dispute resolution 12 24 32
IFSP requirements/procedures 35 69 92
Staffing levels 13 25 34
Personnel qualifications 21 41 55
Natural environments 32 63 84
Performance on child assessments 14 27 37
Disproportionality of racial/ethnic groups 9 18 24
Transition to other settings 27 53 71
Transition to preschool 33 65 87
Timeliness of referrals/evaluations/services/reporting1 9 18 24
Other focus areas 12 24 32
Not applicable.
1 This category did not appear in the questionnaire. It was constructed from other state specific responses.
NOTE: States could select more than one focus area, therefore, the Percent column will not sum to 100.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, Evaluation of States' Monitoring and Improvement Practices Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part C Monitoring Evaluation Questionnaire.