Self-Regulated Strategy Development
Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) is an intervention designed to improve students’ academic skills through a six-step process that teaches students specific academic strategies and self-regulation skills. The practice is especially appropriate for students with learning disabilities. The intervention begins with teacher direction and ends with students independently applying the strategy, such as planning and organizing ideas before writing an essay. More specifically, the six steps involve the teacher providing background knowledge, discussing the strategy with the student, modeling the strategy, helping the student memorize the strategy, supporting the strategy, and then watching as the student independently performs the strategy. A key part of the process is teaching self-regulation skills, such as goal-setting and self-monitoring, which aim to help students apply the strategy without guidance. The steps can be combined, changed, reordered, or repeated, depending on the needs of the student. The SRSD model can be used with students in grades 2 through 12 in individual, small group, or whole classroom settings.
Reviewed Research
Students with a Specific Learning Disability
|
Outcome domain |
Effectiveness rating |
Studies meeting standards |
Grades examined |
Students |
Improvement index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Mathematics Achievement | N/A | 1 study meets standards | 5-6 | 3 | -- |
| Case, Lisa Pericola; And Others. (1992) | 5-6 | 3 | -- | ||
| Writing achievement |
|
9 studies meet standards | 2-10 | 40 | -- |
| Danoff, Barbara; And Others. (1993) | 4-5 | 3 | -- | ||
| De La Paz, Susan. (1999) | 7-8 | 6 | -- | ||
| De La Paz, Susan; Graham, Steve. (1997) | 5 | 3 | -- | ||
| Graham, Steve; Harris, Karen R. (1989) | 6 | 3 | -- | ||
| Saddler, Bruce. (2006) | 2 | 6 | -- | ||
| Saddler, Bruce; Asaro, Kristie. (2007) | 2 | 6 | -- | ||
| Sexton, Melissa; Harris, Karen R.; Graham, Steve. (1998) | 5-6 | 6 | -- | ||
| Straub, C. L. (2012) | 6-10 | 4 | -- | ||
| Troia, Gary A.; Harris, Karen R.; Graham, Steve. (1999) | 5 | 3 | -- |
A group of closely related outcomes.
A summary of the effectiveness of an intervention in an outcome domain, based on the quality of research, the statistical significance of findings, the magnitude of findings, and the consistency of findings across studies.
 Positive: strong evidence that intervention had a positive effect on outcomes. |
 Potentially Positive: evidence that intervention had a positive effect on outcomes with no overriding contrary evidence. |
 Mixed: evidence that intervention’s effect on outcomes is inconsistent. |
 No Discernible: no evidence that intervention had an effect on outcomes. |
 Potentially Negative: evidence that intervention had a negative effect on outcomes with no overriding contrary evidence. |
 Negative: strong evidence that intervention had a negative effect on outcomes. |
For more, please see the WWC Glossary entry for rating of effectiveness.
The number of studies that met WWC design standards and provide evidence of effectiveness. Selecting an item below will display all studies that met WWC design studies in the domain. Selecting a study citation will take you to more information on that study and its findings.
For more, please see the WWC Glossary entry for study rating.
Grades of the students examined in the studies that met WWC design standards, which may not reflect the full range of grades for which the intervention may be used.
The number of students included in the studies that met WWC design standards.
The sample size for the studies that met WWC design standards.
An indicator of the effect of the intervention, the improvement index can be interpreted as the expected change in percentile rank for an average comparison group student if that student had received the intervention.
For more, please see the WWC Glossary entry for improvement index.
The indicator represents the highest level of similarity found between your students and each of the high-quality studies of the intervention. Three filled in ovals indicates that at least one study that met standards was conducted on students very similar to yours. Clicking on the indicator for a study will provide information on the similarity for each of the characteristics you selected.