
The Use of Video Self-Modeling and Peer Training to Increase Social Engagement in Preschool Children on the Autism Spectrum
Bellini, Scott; Gardner, Lauren; Hudock, Rebekah; Kashima-Ellingson, Yuri (2016). School Psychology Forum, v10 n2 p207-219. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1149029
-
examining3Students, gradePK
Single Study Review
Review Details
Reviewed: March 2026
- Single Study Review (findings for Video self-modeling (VSM))
- Single Case Design
- Meets WWC standards with reservations because it is a SCD design where the independent variable is manipulated by the researcher, each outcome is measured systematically over time by multiple assessors with a sufficient number of assessment points and inter-assessor agreement, but there are an insufficient number of phases and/or assessments per phase to meet without reservations.
This review may not reflect the full body of research evidence for this intervention.
Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.
Findings
To view more detailed information about the study findings from this review, please download findings data here.
Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.
Sample Characteristics
Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.
-
Male: 100% -
Race Other or unknown 100% -
Ethnicity Other or unknown 100% -
Eligible for Free and Reduced Price Lunch Other or unknown 100%
Study Details
Setting
The study took place in two self-contained special education preschool classrooms in two separate public schools. Each classroom included 1 or 2 typically developing students without disabilities, but most of the children in each class had disabilities. No additional information about the location or types of schools was provided.
Study sample
This study included three preschool students who were identified by their school as students with autism spectrum disorder and received special education services in a public school program. All three students were males and ranged in age from 4 to 5 years old. Two of the students were described as socially withdrawn and had limited interactions with peers. The third child had no discernible expressive language deficits but had inconsistent social interactions with peers. No additional student characteristics were provided.
Intervention Group
The primary purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a video self-modeling (VSM) intervention on social engagement behaviors of three preschool students with autism spectrum disorder. The intervention involved having children view videos of themselves demonstrating successful social engagement behaviors. Prior to beginning the single-case design study, the researchers collected 90 minutes of video footage of the children while they were playing and being prompted frequently to engage with their peers. The research team then created three, one-minute videos of each participant. The videos were edited by the research team to remove the teacher's prompting and any interactions that were considered inappropriate or ineffectual. During the VSM sessions, students began each day in their teacher's office by watching a video of themselves playing with classmates. Teachers rotated clips each day, and the teacher or paraprofessional present during the clip viewing did not provide any instruction or reinforcement other than to direct students to watch the video. After watching the video, the students were sent to the classroom to participate in free play with their classmates. During this time, teachers did not prompt students to engage in social interactions. The VSM sessions lasted 30 minutes and took place over a 3-to 5-week period.
Comparison Group
There is no comparison group in single-case designs. The baseline period occurred 2 weeks after the video footage for the VSM videos was captured. Sessions lasted 30 minutes each and took place at the beginning of the school day during classroom free-play time. Teachers did not prompt social engagement.
Support for implementation
During the VSM sessions, staff were asked to draw the students' attention to the video with brief verbal or gestural cues. Staff were provided a brief training on this procedure.
An indicator of the effect of the intervention, the improvement index can be interpreted as the expected change in percentile rank for an average comparison group student if that student had received the intervention.
For more, please see the WWC Glossary entry for improvement index.
An outcome is the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that are attained as a result of an activity. An outcome measures is an instrument, device, or method that provides data on the outcome.
A finding that is included in the effectiveness rating. Excluded findings may include subgroups and subscales.
The sample on which the analysis was conducted.
The group to which the intervention group is compared, which may include a different intervention, business as usual, or no services.
The timing of the post-intervention outcome measure.
The number of students included in the analysis.
The mean score of students in the intervention group.
The mean score of students in the comparison group.
The WWC considers a finding to be statistically significant if the likelihood that the finding is due to chance alone, rather than a real difference, is less than five percent.
The WWC reviews studies for WWC products, Department of Education grant competitions, and IES performance measures.
The name and version of the document used to guide the review of the study.
The version of the WWC design standards used to guide the review of the study.
The result of the WWC assessment of the study. The rating is based on the strength of evidence of the effectiveness of the intervention. Studies are given a rating of Meets WWC Design Standards without Reservations, Meets WWC Design Standards with Reservations, or >Does Not Meet WWC Design Standards.
A related publication that was reviewed alongside the main study of interest.
Study findings for this report.
Based on the direction, magnitude, statistical significance, and sample size of the findings within a domain, the WWC assigns effectiveness ratings as one of the following: Tier 1 (strong evidence), Tier 2 (moderate evidence), Tier 3 (promising evidence), uncertain effects, and negative effects. For more detail, please see the WWC Handbook.
The WWC may review studies for multiple purposes, including different reports and re-reviews using updated standards. Each WWC review of this study is listed in the dropdown. Details on any review may be accessed by making a selection from the drop down list.
Tier 1 Strong indicates strong evidence of effectiveness,
Tier 2 Moderate indicates moderate evidence of effectiveness, and
Tier 3 Promising indicates promising evidence of effectiveness,
as defined in the
non-regulatory guidance for ESSA
and the regulations for ED discretionary grants (EDGAR Part 77).