July 29, 2020
SRI International
Emma Pellerin, REL Appalachia
Assessments are an essential part of the teaching and learning process. After days, weeks, or months of instruction, educators typically administer a quiz, a test, or assign an essay to assess student mastery (insert student complaints/groans here). But what if students were excited to show what they had learned, and viewed assessments as an opportunity to do just that?
Excitement may sound like wishful thinking, but some Virginia science teachers had the chance to see this idea become reality when they administered performance-based assessments (PBA) in the fall of 2019. A PBA asks students to craft their own responses to a problem that is authentic to their experience by constructing an answer, producing a product, or performing an activity.1 Research shows that performance assessments help teachers develop instructional strategies that strengthen students' problem-solving and critical thinking skills.2 Using performance assessments can increase student engagement as well as academic and interpersonal skill development.3 PBAs can be implemented in formal or informal settings, and can serve as formative or interim assessments, as well as high-level summative assessments.4, 5 Examples of PBAs range from biweekly journal entries, to reports, to even dance performances.
With educators from the Prince William and Arlington school divisions, REL Appalachia (REL AP) staff members developed a four-step process, outlined below, to support educators implementing performance assessments:
The development process incorporates the Virginia Quality Criteria Review Tool for Performance Assessments (Criteria Tool), which outlines seven quality criteria for a performance assessment, such as considerations for student engagement and ensuring the authenticity of an assessment. Together, REL AP staff members and Virginia science teachers created a participant workbook, Implementing High-Quality Performance Assessments in Science, to support educators administering their first performance assessment.
REL AP staff members coached science teachers from Prince William and Arlington County Public Schools as they administered performance assessments in the 2019/20 school year. We recently sat down with them to debrief their experience and talk about what goes into executing a quality performance assessment in the classroom. They shared which steps went well for them, aspects of developing and implementing a performance assessment that proved challenging, and advice for anyone creating and implementing a performance assessment for the first time.
Are you interested in learning more about PBA? View the resources below for more information and check our site regularly for upcoming events and new resources.
Upcoming Webinar Series
Join our webinar series on implementing performance assessments planned for August 4 and 11, 2020. Participants will learn about best practices for developing and administering PBAs in their own classrooms from Virginia science teachers. Look out for the webinar dates before the start of the 2020/21 school year.
Recent REL research
Partner resources
Footnotes:
1 McTighe, J. (2014). Designing cornerstone performance tasks to promote meaningful learning and assess what matters most. Jay McTighe & Associates Consulting. https://dpi.wi.gov/sites/default/files/imce/ela/ resources/McTighe_Handout_2%5B1%5D.pdf; Parsi, A., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). Performance assessments: How state policy can advance assessments for 21st century learning. White paper. National Association of State Boards of Education. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/ performance-assessments-how-state-policy-can-advance-assessments-21st-century-learning.pdf
2 Koretz, D., Mitchell, K., Barron, S., & Keith, S. (1996). Final report: The perceived effects of the Maryland school performance assessment program. CRESST/RAND Institute on Education and Training. https://www. researchgate.net/publication/239850587_Final_Report_Perceived_Effects_of_the_Maryland_School_ Performance_Assessment_Program; Faxon-Mills, S., Hamilton, L. S., Rudnick, M., & Stecher, B. M. (2013). New assessments, better instruction? Designing assessment systems to promote instructional improvement. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR354.html
3 Foote, C. J. (2005). The challenge and potential of high-need urban education. Journal of Negro Education, 74(4), 371–381.
4 Formative assessments enable educators to gather regular feedback about student learning during instruction so that teachers can adjust instruction, as needed. They assess a relatively narrow amount of content. Interim assessments allow teachers to identify strengths and weaknesses in curriculum/instruction. They are implemented less frequently than formative assessments and reflect a broader amount of content. Summative assessments are administered at the end of a unit or grade to evaluate overall curriculum/instructional effectiveness.
5 Parsi, A., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). Performance assessments: How state policy can advance assessments for 21st century learning. White paper. National Association of State Boards of Education. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/performance-assessments-how-state-policy-can-advance-assessments-21st-century-learning.pdf; Perie, M., Marion, S., & Gong, B. (2009). Moving toward a comprehensive assessment system: A framework for considering interim assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 5–13. https://www.nciea.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/Defining%20Interim_PerieMarionGong2009.pdf