REL Pacific
Jeanette Simenson-Gurolnick & Kirsten Miller
February 26, 2021
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, educators across the globe have had to navigate drastic changes in how instruction is delivered. As we approach the one-year anniversary of the pandemic and reflect on how teachers have adjusted their practice, we know that the abrupt shift to a distance learning model has been challenging. When faced with unfamiliar technological platforms (and little training for navigating them), teachers initially and understandably shifted their classroom instruction—which previously included a variety of approaches such as small-group learning, classroom discussion, and real-time feedback—to a primarily lecture-based model. New technological considerations have also impacted teachers' ability to individualize instruction, develop relationships, and engage and motivate students. Where a teacher might circulate throughout the classroom during small-group work, for example, listening to students' conversations and providing targeted feedback, it's much more difficult for teachers to be equally accessible to students during multiple online breakout rooms. In short, we're now asking teachers to learn new pedagogy in addition to, and because of, this new technology.
REL Pacific recently conducted a series of trainings on Designing Distance Learning for Pacific Island Education Systems to help support jurisdictions in their work to learn about evidence-based practices for designing distance education programs for their schools and institutions. In the first blog of this series, we'll discuss the fundamentals of design thinking frameworks, which we can use to identify our current challenges or problems of practice and develop processes to support the implementation of a distance learning plan. Design thinking is an iterative approach to problem-solving that focuses on fully understanding the real-world implications of a problem and considering and testing multiple solutions.1
From an organizational theory perspective, theories and frameworks allow us to make assumptions about our organizations and the people we work with, and are tools we can use to help define our individual roles and collective contributions to the work of educating students.2 Designing and implementing distance learning on a broad scale is a new challenge for many education systems, and the five stages of design thinking can provide a unique way to tackle this challenge from both a practical and relational perspective. The five stages of design thinking are:
Footnotes:
1 Dam, R.F., and Siang, T.Y. (2020, July). 5 stages in the design thinking process. Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process
2 Bess, J. L., and Dee, J. R. (2008). Understanding College and University Organization: Dynamics of a System (Vol. II). Stylus Publishing, LLC.
3 Dam, R.F., and Siang, T.Y. (2020, July). 5 stages in the design thinking process. Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process
4 Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Sanford. (2020, April 30). Start with design. Stanford d.school. https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/get-started-with-design
5 Dam, R.F., and Siang, T.Y. (2020, July). 5 stages in the design thinking process. Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process
6 Ibid.
7 Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Sanford. (2020, April 30). Start with design. Stanford d.school. https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/get-started-with-design
8 Dam, R.F., and Siang, T.Y. (2020, July). 5 stages in the design thinking process. Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process
9 Ibid.