REL Southwest Ask A REL Response
Educator Effectiveness:
Benefits of Participating in Professional Learning Communities
November 2019
Question:
What is the educational benefit of teachers, staff, and/or administrators participating in professional learning communities?
Response:
Print-friendly version (557 KB)
Thank you for the question you submitted to our REL Reference Desk. We have prepared the following memo with research references to help answer your question. For each reference, we provide an abstract, excerpt, or summary written by the study’s author or publisher. Following an established Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Southwest research protocol, we conducted a search for research reports as well as descriptive study articles on the benefit regarding student achievement when teachers, staff, and/or administrators participate in professional learning communities (PLCs).
We have not evaluated the quality of references and the resources provided in this response. We offer them only for your reference. Also, we searched the references in the response from the most commonly used resources of research, but they are not comprehensive, and other relevant references and resources may exist. References provided are listed in alphabetical order, not necessarily in order of relevance. We do not include sources that are not freely available to the requestor.
Research References
Crippen, K. J., Biesinger, K. D., & Ebert, E. K. (2010). Using professional development to achieve classroom reform and science proficiency: An urban success story from southern Nevada, USA. Professional Development in Education, 36(4), 637–661. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ904397. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240543763
Doğan, S., Pringle, R., & Mesa, J. (2016). The impacts of professional learning communities on science teachers’ knowledge, practice and student learning: A review. Professional Development in Education, 42(4), 569–588. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1104427. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/21802808/The_impacts_of_professional_learning_communiti es_on_science_teachers_knowledge_practice_and_student_learning_A_review
Huggins, K. S., Scheurich, J. J., & Morgan, J. R. (2011). Professional learning communities as a leadership strategy to drive math success in an urban high school serving diverse, low-income students: A case study. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 16(2), 67–88. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ924690. Retrieved from https://researchgate.net/publication/233042269
Thompson, J., Richards, J., Shim, S.-Y., Lohwasser, K., Von Esch, K. S., Chew, C., et al. (2019). Launching networked PLCs: Footholds into creating and improving knowledge of ambitious and equitable teaching practices in an RPP. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–22. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1229665
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(1), 80–91. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ782410. Retrieved from https://www.dvusd.org/cms/lib/AZ01901092/Centricity/Domain/9762/CIA_PLC_Research_Article.pdf
Additional Organizations to Consult
All Things PLC — https://www.allthingsplc.info/
REL Southwest — https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southwest/plc.asp
Methods
Keywords and Search Strings
The following keywords and search strings were used to search the reference databases and other sources:
- [(“professional learning communities” AND “effectiveness”) AND (“teachers” OR “principals” OR “staff”) AND “achievement”]
- [(“professional learning communities”) AND (“impact”) AND (“achievement”)]
- [(“professional learning communities”) AND (“student achievement” OR “effectiveness” OR “classroom impact”)]
Databases and Resources
We searched ERIC for relevant, peer-reviewed research references. ERIC is a free online library of more than 1.7 million citations of education research sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES). Additionally, we searched the What Works Clearinghouse.
Reference Search and Selection Criteria
When we were searching and reviewing resources, we considered the following criteria:
- Date of the publication: References and resources published from 2004 to present, were include in the search and review.
- Search priorities of reference sources: Search priority is given to study reports, briefs, and other documents that are published and/or reviewed by IES and other federal or federally funded organizations, academic databases, including ERIC, EBSCO databases, JSTOR database, PsychInfo, PsychArticle, and Google Scholar.
- Methodology: The following methodological priorities/considerations were given in the review and selection of the references: (a) study types—randomized control trials, quasi-experiments, surveys, descriptive data analyses, literature reviews, policy briefs, and so forth, generally in this order; (b) target population, samples (representativeness of the target population, sample size, volunteered or randomly selected, and so forth), study duration, and so forth; and (c) limitations, generalizability of the findings and conclusions, and so forth.