REL Southwest Ask A REL Response
Teacher Workforce:
Strategies for Increasing High Schoolers’ Interest in Teaching
November 2018
Question:
What are effective strategies or programs to increase interest in the teaching profession/recruitment for high school students?
Response:
Print-friendly version
(472 KB)
Thank you for the question you submitted to our REL Reference Desk. We have prepared the following memo with research references to help answer your question. For each reference, we provide an abstract, excerpt, or summary written by the study’s author or publisher. Following an established Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Southwest research protocol, we conducted a search for research reports as well as descriptive study articles on strategies for increasing the interest of high school students in the teaching profession or recruitment of high school students.
We have not evaluated the quality of references and the resources provided in this response. We offer them only for your reference. Also, we searched the references in the response from the most commonly used resources of research, but they are not comprehensive, and other relevant references and resources may exist. References provided are listed in alphabetical order, not necessarily in order of relevance. We do not include sources that are not freely available to the requestor.
Research References
Ayalon, A. (2004). A model for recruitment and retention of minority students to teaching: Lessons from a school-university partnership. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(3), 7–23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ795253
Goings, R. B., & Bianco, M. (2016). It’s hard to be who you don't see: An exploration of Black male high school students’ perspectives on becoming teachers. Urban Review, 48(4), 628–646. Retrieved from https://works.bepress.com/rgoings/9/
Pastermak, D. L., & Longwell-Grice, R. (2010). Urban teacher world: Teacher recruitment from theory to practice. New Horizons in Education, 58(2), 1–17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ966647
Swanson, P. B. (2011). Georgia’s grow-your-own teacher programs attract the right stuff. High School Journal, 94(3), 119–133. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://search.yahoo.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1027&context=mcl_facpub
Thieman, E. B., Rosch, D. M., & Suarez, C. E. (2016). Consideration of agricultural education as a career: A statewide examination by high school class year of predicting factors. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(4), 29–43. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1132914
Zascavage, V., Winterman, K., Armstrong, P., & Schroeder-Steward, J. (2008). A question of effectiveness: Recruitment of special educators within high school peer support groups. International Journal of Special Education, 23(1), 18–30. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ814372
Methods
Keywords and Search Strings
The following keywords and search strings were used to search the reference databases and other sources:
- Strategies for Diverse Teacher Recruitment
- Diversifying the Teaching Profession
- Teacher Diversity
- Grow Your Own (GYO) programs
- Minority teacher recruitment
- “Teacher recruitment strategies” AND “high school students”
Databases and Resources
We searched ERIC for relevant, peer-reviewed research references. ERIC is a free online library of more than 1.6 million citations of education research sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES). Additionally, we searched the What Works Clearinghouse.
Reference Search and Selection Criteria
When we were searching and reviewing resources, we considered the following criteria:
- Date of the publication: References and resources published from 2003 to present, were include in the search and review.
- Search priorities of reference sources: Search priority is given to study reports, briefs, and other documents that are published and/or reviewed by IES and other federal or federally funded organizations, academic databases, including ERIC, EBSCO databases, JSTOR database, PsychInfo, PsychArticle, and Google Scholar.
- Methodology: The following methodological priorities/considerations were given in the review and selection of the references: (a) study types—randomized control trials, quasi-experiments, surveys, descriptive data analyses, literature reviews, policy briefs, and so forth, generally in this order; (b) target population, samples (representativeness of the target population, sample size, volunteered or randomly selected, and so forth), study duration, and so forth; and (c) limitations, generalizability of the findings and conclusions, and so forth.