Skip Navigation
Print Evaluations

Implementation Evaluation of Teaching Residency Programs

Contract Information

Current Status:

This study has been completed.

Duration:

February 2010 – December 2015

Cost:

$3,708,284

Contract Number:

ED-IES-10-C-0001

Contractor(s):

Mathematica Policy Research
Decision Information Resources

Contact:

For many teachers, the early years represent a difficult transition period—first-year teachers tend to be less effective classroom teachers than their experienced counterparts, and newer teachers are more likely to leave the profession. These difficulties are often attributed to lack of adequate teacher preparation and support, issues that teaching residency programs (TRPs) are designed to address. TRPs involve a year-long "clinical" experience (the "residency") shadowing and co-teaching with an experienced mentor. TRPs also provide continued support and mentoring after participants become teachers of record. Before and during their residencies, participants in TRPs take coursework, usually resulting in a master's degree.

This evaluation provides important descriptive and implementation information on TRPs, as well as information on the teacher retention outcomes of teachers who participate in TRPs. The evaluation focused on TRPs that received grants from the Teacher Quality Partnership (TQP) Program in fall 2009 and spring 2010. The evaluation is authorized in Title II, Part A of the Higher Education Act, as amended by the Higher Education Opportunity Act (Public Law 110-315, Section 201 - 204). The TQP program, funded at $43 million in Fiscal Year 2009, received an additional $100 million in funds as part of The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

  • What are the characteristics of Teaching Residency Programs (TRPs) (e.g., length of overall program, nature of required coursework and apprenticeship activities, criteria for selecting program participants)?
  • What are the characteristics of participants in TRPs?
  • What are the retention rates of novice TRP teachers and their novice colleagues who did not go through TRPs?

Descriptive information on TQP grantees operating TRPs was collected through a survey administered in spring 2012. More detailed implementation information was collected through TRP program director interviews and surveys of residents and mentors, conducted within a subset of TRPs during spring 2012. Teacher mobility was tracked through district records and teacher surveys in order to examine retention in the profession, district, and school among novice TRP and novice non-TRP teachers in a subset of six districts.

  • The residency programs provided a fieldwork experience, typically with a trained and experienced mentor teacher, along with integrated coursework.
  • The residency programs somewhat broadened the pool of people entering the teaching profession in the participating districts.
  • TRP teachers were more likely to remain teaching in the same district than non-TRP teachers with similar teaching placements. Eighty-two percent of residency teachers and 72 percent of other teachers remained in the same district from spring 2012 to fall 2013.
  • School-retention rates were similar between the two groups of teachers. Approximately 61% of teachers in both groups remaining in the same school from spring 2012 to fall 2013.
  • TRP teachers who moved to different schools in the same district tended to join ones where a similar proportion of students were from low-income families, a lower percentage were black, and achievement was higher.

A report, titled Teacher Residency Programs: A Multisite Look at a New Model to Prepare Teachers for High-Need Schools, was released in November 2014.

An evaluation brief, titled New Findings on the Retention of Novice Teachers From Teacher Residency Programs, was released in August 2015.

A restricted-use file containing de-identified data is available for the purposes of replicating study findings and secondary analysis.