Skip Navigation
Impact of Two Professional Development Interventions on Early Reading Instruction and Achievement

NCEE 2008-4030
September 2008


Ball, D. L. “Teacher Learning and the Mathematics Reforms: What We Think We Know and What We Need to Learn.” Phi Delta Kappan, 1996, 77(7): 500–508.

Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C., and Loef, M. "Using Knowledge of Children’s Mathematics Thinking in Classroom Teaching: An Experimental Study." American Educational Research Journal, 1989, 26(4):499-531.

Cohen, D. K., and Hill, H. C. Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California (RR-39). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 1998.

Cohen, D. K., and Hill, H. C. Learning Policy: When State Education Reform Works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.

Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., Garet, M., Yoon, K. S., and Birman, B. “Does Professional Development Change Teachers’ Instruction? Results From a Three-Year Study.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2002, 24(2): 81–112.

Elmore, R. Bridging the Gap Between Standards and Achievement: The Imperative for Professional Development in Education. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute, 2002. Available online.

Fletcher, J. M. and Lyon, G. R. “Reading: A Research-Based approach.” In W. M. Evers (Ed.), What’s Gone Wrong in America’s Classrooms. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institute Press, 1998: 49–90.

Foorman, B.R., and Moats, L.C. “Conditions for Sustaining Research-Based Practices in Early Reading Instruction.” Remedial and Special Education, 2004, 25(1): 51–60.

Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., and Yoon, K. S. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers.” American Educational Research Journal, 2001, 38(4): 915–945.

Grant, S. G., Peterson, P. L., and Shojgreen-Downer, A. “Learning to Teach Mathematics in the Context of Systemic Reform.” American Educational Research Journal, 1996, 33(2): 502–541.

Hargreaves, A. and Fullan, M. G. Understanding Teacher Development. London: Cassell, 1992.

Hill, H. C. “Learning in the Teaching Workforce.” The Future of Children, 2007, 17(1): 111- 127.

Kennedy, M. M. Form and substance in in-service teacher education (Research monograph no. 13). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 1998.

Knapp, M. S. “Between Systemic Reforms and the Mathematics and Science Classroom: The Dynamics of Innovation, Implementation, and Professional Learning. Review of Educational Research, 1997, 67(2): 227–266.

Lieberman, A. (Ed.). “Practices that Support Teacher Development: Transforming Conceptions of Professional Learning.” In M. W. McLaughlin and I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher Learning: New Policies, New Practices. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 1996: 185-201.

Lieberman, A., and McLaughlin, M. W. “Networks for Educational Change: Powerful and Problematic.” Phi Delta Kappan, 1992, 73: 673–677.

Little, J. W. “Teachers’ Professional Development in a Climate of Educational Reform.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1993, 15(2): 129–151.

Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., and Stiles, K. E. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc., 1998.

McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., Green, L. B., Beretvas, S. N., Cox, S., Potter, N. S., Quiroga, T., and Gray, A. “Beginning Literacy: Links Among Teacher Knowledge, Teacher Practice, and Student Learning.” Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2002, 35: 69–86.

Moats, L. C. Teaching Reading IS Rocket Science: What Expert Teachers of Reading Should Know and Be Able To Do. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers, 2002.

Moats, L.C. Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling (LETRS). Longmont, CO: Sopris West Educational Services, 2005.

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and its Implications for Reading Instruction: Reports of the Subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000.

Stiles, K., Loucks-Horsley, S., and Hewson, P. Principles of Effective Professional Development for Mathematics and Science Education: A Synthesis of Standards (NISE Brief, Vol. 1). Madison, WI: National Institutes for Science Education, 1996.

Talbert, J. E., and McLaughlin, M. W. “Understanding Teaching In Context.” In D. K. Cohen, M. W. McLaughlin, and J. E. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching for Understanding: Challenges for Policy and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 1993: 167-206.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary, Policy and Program Studies Service. Improving Teacher Quality in U.S. School Districts: Districts’ Use of Title II, Part A, Funds in 2002-2003. Washington, DC, 2005.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service. Reading First Implementation Evaluation: Interim Report. Washington, DC, 2006.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service. State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, Volume I—Teacher Quality Under NCLB: Interim Report, Washington, DC, 2007.