For more than 50 years, the RELs have collaborated with school districts, state departments of education, and other education stakeholders to help them generate and use evidence and improve student outcomes. Read more
Home Blogs Report examines the use of enhanced coaching for teachers to improve early reading instruction and achievement
Proficiency in reading by the end of grade 3 is key to students’ later academic success. Educators in Chicago Public Schools are working to improve early literacy outcomes through the P–2 Balanced Literacy Initiative, a multiyear professional development program for prekindergarten (preK) through grade 2 teachers. The initiative provides teachers with professional development on instruction that balances systematic foundational literacy skills with the use of rich, complex texts to teach reading and writing.
As part of the initiative, designated priority schools received enhanced coaching supports, such as more frequent site-based coaching, to improve young students’ independent reading. A new study from the Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Midwest, conducted in partnership with the Midwest Early Childhood Education Research Alliance, compared outcomes between priority and nonpriority schools and looked at the successes and challenges of implementing the initiative.
>> Read and download the full report.
Chicago Public Schools launched the P–2 Balanced Literacy Initiative in the 2016/17 school year. By 2018/19, the initiative included 115 elementary schools (23 percent) in the district. Of these schools, the district designated 26 priority schools to receive enhanced supports focused on independent reading. District leaders identified these schools based on criteria that indicated whether a school had a higher level of need and was prepared to support the initiative.
The Midwest Early Childhood Education Research Alliance requested this study to determine whether attending a priority school that received enhanced coaching led to higher student reading achievement than attending a similar nonpriority school that received the initiative’s standard supports. The study team also examined how participation in the initiative’s core professional development sessions differed between priority and nonpriority schools. In addition, researchers interviewed education leaders, instructional support coaches, and teachers working with or in priority schools about their experiences with and perceptions of the initiative.
The study examined implementation of the P–2 Balanced Literacy Initiative at participating priority and nonpriority schools for one school year (2018/19). Researchers analyzed 2018/19 district administrative data for all K–2 students and their teachers as well as district data on the initiative’s implementation. To understand the conditions necessary to successfully implement the initiative’s enhanced coaching and professional development supports, the research team reviewed the interview transcripts and identified common themes.
Key findings include the following:
These findings should be considered in the context of two of the study’s limitations. First, the study’s design cannot make strong causal claims about the impacts of enhanced coaching supports in the P–2 Balanced Literacy Initiative. Second, the study findings may not be generalizable to other districts that have different characteristics than Chicago Public Schools. For more information, see the full report.
The study’s findings can help inform multiple courses of action for districts leaders, both in Chicago Public Schools and elsewhere in the Midwest.
To learn more about the study and its findings, read the full report. For more information about REL Midwest’s work to support early childhood literacy, see the following related resources:
Author(s)
Joni Wackwitz
Connect with REL Midwest