Welcome educators! This Algebra Toolkit is a collection of professional development and implementation resources developed by the Regional Educational Laboratory Central through the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. This toolkit is designed to support algebra educators in implementing evidence-based recommendations described in the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Teaching Strategies for Improving Algebra Knowledge in Middle and High School Students practice guide.
The practice guide presents three evidence-based recommendations:
In addition to school and district leader support, effective implementation of the Algebra Toolkit also requires the necessary resources. Learn more in:
Resources needed to implement the Algebra Toolkit PDF (141 KB)
The resources in this toolkit are designed to help you incorporate the three evidence-based recommendations from the practice guide into your classroom to help students succeed in algebra and set them up for success in future math courses. This toolkit includes a series of learning modules that will introduce you to the evidence-based recommendations from the practice guide, help you understand the key concepts and principles behind these recommendations, and provide specific instructional strategies to support your use of the recommendations in the classroom. You can integrate these instructional strategies into your current teaching and curriculum. That is, it is not intended to be a curriculum unto itself, but to help improve upon existing practices.
The Algebra Toolkit is intended primarily for use by in-service educators who want to improve their teaching of algebra. The instructional strategies supported by the toolkit can be useful for educators at all different levels: educators brand new to algebra instruction, those who have experience but have struggled in some aspect of instruction, and those whose practice is well-advanced but are just looking to sharpen their skills. This toolkit, through the framework of Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, is designed to support each of you as you plan for and implement the instructional strategies in your classrooms, gather data to assess, and work to continually improve.
In developing this toolkit, we have designed it to facilitate the work of a group of educators, supported by a facilitator, working together in a professional learning community (PLC). We recognize that some educators may already be using some or all of these instructional strategies effectively. Others may be trying these instructional strategies but not getting results, so this toolkit is a way to examine why that might be so. Other educators might be working to make these instructional strategies a more common experience across their algebra courses, so they are interested in making them more routine. Still others might be struggling with the content itself, such as truly understanding what is meant by structure or being able to develop multiple representations for algebraic problems and solutions. Each of you brings individual strengths and can find value in collaborating with your colleagues in a PLC.
The toolkit is designed to be flexible and can be adapted to fit the needs and schedules of different groups of educators; for example groups of educators who work together within a school, across multiple schools in a district, or remotely across districts. Your team might also include administrators who wish to strengthen their knowledge and skills as instructional leaders for math.
The Algebra Toolkit includes several components to support you, as educators, as you implement instructional strategies to support the practice guide recommendations in your classrooms:
Together, these components provide a comprehensive toolkit to support you in implementing the evidence-based recommendations and improving your teaching of algebra.
The overall structure of the toolkit is built around the three, evidence-based recommendations from the practice guide. We have developed three modules that focus on each of the practice guide recommendations. These modules will help you build an understanding of the recommendations, as well as guide you and your colleagues in implementing instructional strategies to support the recommendations in your classroom, supported by the structure of a Professional Learning Community (PLC). These three modules are sandwiched between an initial "Setting the Stage" session to orient you to the toolkit and help start your PLC, and a final module (Module 4) designed to support sustained and long-term use of the instructional strategies in your classroom, school, and district. In this final module, having completed Modules 1–3, you will reflect across the three modules to identify successes and work together to address challenges moving forward. Then, you will be guided to develop action plans to support sustained use of effective instructional strategies in your classrooms. Additionally, you will share your developed action plans with your administrators and begin discussions about how to expand the use of effective practices to additional educators and classrooms in your schools and/or districts.
This toolkit is designed for educators to complete as part of a PLC. Coming together as a community of learners around a shared interest brings coherence and continuous learning to professional development (Vescio et al., 2008), and learning collaboratively has many benefits, even if your peers are not in the same physical school building.
The phrase "professional learning community" has been used for many years, to mean many different things. For this toolkit, we mean:
Source: Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education 24(1), 80–91. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ782410
A PDSA cycle is a four-phase cycle of inquiry used by practitioners—such as educators, school leaders, and school staff—to continually improve their practice. During PDSA cycles, practitioners initiate small changes to their practice; collect information (or data) about how well the changes are being implemented and whether they are contributing to intended outcomes; reflect on learnings from the data; and make decisions about whether to continue with the practice or initiate additional small changes.
Engaging in PDSA cycles is one way to improve mathematics teaching and learning continuously and iteratively. They are a component of improvement science approaches and have been used extensively in education improvement efforts.
The role of the facilitator in your team is to provide support, guidance, and coordination for the sessions within each of the three modules. When identifying the role of facilitator, you should be thoughtful about who makes the most sense in your context. In the least, the facilitator should be able to successfully coordinate the PLC sessions and guide participants through the content. In your school or district, this might be an experienced algebra educator or an instructional leader. In the case where a educator is serving as facilitator, it would likely be a heavy lift for that educator to also be a participant, so we recommend the facilitator focus on the role of facilitation, unless your PLC group is small and educators are sharing facilitation roles. Through the facilitator guide, we've provided details and examples, as well as scripts to support facilitators. The facilitator's main responsibilities are to:
For implementation of the Algebra Toolkit to be successful, it is critical for school or district leaders to provide educators and facilitators with necessary support and resources. Some of the supports that might help make the toolkit process successful include:
The Algebra Toolkit is intended for a group of in-service educators and a facilitator to work through over the course of a single school year. Each learning module includes independent prework, collaborative PLC sessions, and independent between-session work. Educators can usually complete the prework and between-session on their own time. Although the amount of time needed for this work may vary, it typically can be completed in one to two hours.
The length of time it takes to complete the Algebra Toolkit may vary depending on the group's schedule and the amount of time the group is able to devote to the learning modules and activities. The Facilitator's Guide includes a sample planning calendar. The facilitator and team should consider whether there are existing structures and activities, such as professional development or common planning time sessions, which can be used for the in-person PLC sessions. This can help minimize the impact of the meetings on educators' schedules and reduce scheduling conflicts.
Begin your learning journey! Click the Next button below or select the Setting the Stage tab in the menu at the top of the page.
Setting the Stage is an orientation to the Algebra Toolkit. Learning objectives include:
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Pre-session work, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
Complete the following prework to familiarize yourself with the Algebra Toolkit and the evidence-based recommendations in the Teaching Strategies for Improving Algebra Knowledge in Middle and High School Students practice guide.
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 1, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 1, participants will:
When you are ready to move to Module 1, select the Next button below.
By the end of Module 1, participants will:
Use solved problems to engage students in analyzing algebraic reasoning and strategies.
—Teaching Strategies for Improving Algebra Knowledge in Middle and High School Students, p. 4
Compared to elementary math work like arithmetic, solving algebra problems often requires students to think more abstractly and to process multiple pieces of complex information simultaneously. This can challenge students' working memory and interfere with their ability to learn new content. Solved problems can minimize the burden of abstract reasoning by allowing students to see the problem and many solution steps at once—without executing each step—helping students learn more efficiently. Analyzing and discussing solved problems, including incorrectly solved problems, can help students develop a deeper understanding of logical strategies for problem solving.
Based on research evidence, the following instructional strategies may boost students' procedural skills and conceptual knowledge and improve algebraic problem solving:
Educators can use solved problems in a variety of ways to engage students in analyzing algebraic reasoning and strategies. Consider the most appropriate strategies for using solved problems during each stage in the instructional cycle: Introducing a new topic, building understanding of the topic, and approaching proficiency (see sections below).
When introducing a new topic, it may be appropriate to begin by having students discuss correctly solved problem structures and solutions to make connections among strategies and reasoning. For example, you may facilitate a large-group discussion about a single, correctly solved problem to help students understand the logical problem-solving process and problem structure. You may also consider providing a correctly solved problem for students to analyze in small groups or pairs, and to reflect on their discussions with the large group. The following example demonstrates how an educator might use a solved problem along with guiding questions to introduce the topic of solving exponential equations.
Guiding questions for student discussion – Problem-solving process:
Guiding questions for student discussion – Problem structure:
Notice that the guiding questions for student discussion ask students to think critically about the order of the problem-solving steps and the structure of the problem. These types of guiding questions are key to maximizing student learning in whole-class or small-group discussions because they help students understand the reasoning behind the solution strategy.
As students build their understanding of the topic, consider engaging them in discussion about problems that illustrate common errors. When displaying incorrectly solved problems, be sure to clearly mark them as incorrect. Ask students to analyze the solved problem, determine where the error occurred, and explain why the error may have occurred. Choose or create problems that show errors that your students are making so that you can correct their most common misconceptions. This strategy can help students avoid common errors and build a deeper understanding of correct problem-solving strategies.
One way to introduce incorrectly solved problems is to display them next to their correctly solved counterparts. The example below demonstrates how an educator might use correctly and incorrectly solved problems presented side by side to deepen students' understanding of solving rational equations.
Sample questions for student discussion:
Notice that the guiding questions for student discussion ask students to compare the correct solution to an incorrectly solved problem that uses the same problem-solving strategy. (For example, both problem solvers used the distributive property as their second step rather than dividing both sides of the equation by 2). Displaying parallel problems with the same strategy can scaffold all learners' understanding of the concept. In addition, guiding questions support students to understand the reasoning that led to Andrew's error and how they might avoid the error.
As you consider additional examples to share with students, in the example above, Jasmin's correct strategy ends in an integer solution for x while Andrew's incorrect strategy does not. Students tend to expect integers when solving equations, so presenting a correct strategy that does not lead to an integer solution matched with an incorrect strategy that does lead to an integer solution is a way to challenge and build students' thinking.
As students approach proficiency, you may consider having them analyze and discuss multiple solved problems with varying degrees of complexity. This can help students recognize patterns in the solution steps across problems. As in the following example, you may arrange problems from simplest to most complex applications of the same concept and prompt students to notice similarities in structure and solution steps across problems.
Guiding questions for student discussion:
Notice the guiding questions ask students to observe similarities and differences across the three solved problems. In this example, it would be important for students to recognize that expression B does not start as a difference of two squares—the solver must factor 2x from both terms first. Prompting students to consider small, but important, differences across solved problem structures and solution strategies may help them reach proficiency.
As students near proficiency, you may also consider extending Strategy B by displaying problems with errors on their own without any correct counterpart. Ask students to identify the step that contains the error and why it is incorrect. Because students are approaching proficiency, you may ask them to answer guiding questions in pairs or independently (in writing) rather than as a large group. During a unit about linear equations, a teacher might provide the incorrectly solved problem, as in the following example, along with its guided questions, for students to reflect on independently before discussing their answers with a partner.
Problem: When Kendra joins a new gym, she spends $75 to buy her gym supplies, then pays $50 per month for her gym membership. Write an equation to show the overall cost, c, of her new gym plan for m months. How many months can Kendra continue to attend the gym to stay within her budget of $1000?
Sample guiding questions for students' written responses and discussion:
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Pre-session work, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
Learn about and reflect on the content that will be covered in Module 1 before your first PLC Session. This pre-session work will take approximately 60 minutes to complete.
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 1, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 1, teachers will:

Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Between-session Work, click the Next button below or select the tab in menu at the top of the page.
Complete this between-session work before PLC Session 2. All steps will take approximately 60 minutes to complete.
Collect or create at least five solved problems you can use in an upcoming lesson or series of lessons. Remember, solved problems can take many different forms. They can be correctly or incorrectly solved and can be displayed alone or in parallel with other solved problems. Please follow the steps below to collect or create your solved problems.
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 2, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 2, participants will:

Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Between-session work, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
Complete this between-session work before PLC Session 3. All steps will take approximately 60 minutes to complete.
Review each of the data tools linked below. These tools are also included in appendix B of the Participant Workbook PDF (2 MB).
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 3, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 3, participants will:
Discussion questions: Implementation data tools
When you are finished with your implementation discussion, gather with a colleague or group of colleagues who chose the same outcomes tool as you. Together, use the discussion questions that follow for your outcome data tool to discuss when and how you will use the data tool in your classroom. Document decisions you make for your classroom within Handout 1H: PDSA Cycle Tool – Plan phase part 2 (cont.) in the Module 1 Participant Workbook PDF (2 MB).
Discussion questions: Outcome data tools
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Between-session work, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
Complete this between-session work before PLC Session 4. All steps will take approximately 120 minutes to complete.

Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 4, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 4, participants will:
Consider the following reflection questions:
Congratulations on completing your first PDSA cycle! Now you can refine your instructional strategies regarding using solved problems in instruction. Please find the full PDSA tool in Appendix A of the Toolkit Introduction Participant Workbook PDF (2 MB) or available for download here PDF (116 KB). Using your completed Act phase of Handout 1K, create a new plan for implementation using the PDSA Tool based on the data-informed revisions you noted above and continue a new cycle of implementation.
As you continue to integrate Recommendation 1 into your teaching, consider what supports you need from your PLC members and other members of your school community. This might involve scheduling collaborative planning or visitation time with PLC members to discuss how to incorporate Recommendation 1 into lessons, share successful strategies, and observe each other's implementation. You also might solicit feedback from administrators, colleagues, and students on the effectiveness of your implementation of Recommendation 1, using some of the data tools in the Participant Workbook PDF (2 MB) appendices B1, B2, and B3, as well as structuring more uses of the student assessment tools in appendix B4. Continue to draw from the guidance for implementation shown in Handout 1C to identify approaches to using solved problems in instruction.
Please note that you should aim to complete multiple PDSA cycles for Recommendation 1 within this current school year. Feel free, however, to complete these cycles when it is feasible for you considering your schedule, curriculum, and progression through the other toolkit modules.

When you are ready to move to Module 2, select the Next button below.
By the end of Module 2, participants will:
Teach students to utilize the structure of algebraic representations.
—Teaching Strategies for Improving Algebra Knowledge in Middle and High School Students, p. 16
Utilizing the structure of algebraic representations can simplify solving algebra problems. Paying attention to algebraic structure helps students make connections among problems, solution strategies, and representations that may seem different but are mathematically similar, as shown in Example 2.1. Recognizing structure helps students understand the characteristics of algebraic expressions and problems regardless of whether the problems are presented in symbolic, numeric, verbal, or graphic forms.

Structure refers to an algebraic representation's underlying mathematical features and their logical relationships to each other. Examples of mathematical features and their logical relationships include:
Examining the underlying structure of an algebra problem (the algebraic representation), regardless of how the problem itself is communicated (for example, symbolic, numeric, verbal, or graphic), can help students see similarities among problems and solution paths. It also leads students to develop an understanding about algebraic expressions. Based on research evidence, use of reflective questioning and graphical representations may boost students' conceptual and procedural knowledge and improve algebraic problem solving. The use of appropriate language and multiple representations might further support students. Educators can use each of these instructional strategies to teach students to utilize the structure of algebraic representations:
This instructional strategy extends beyond just using precise mathematical language. This strategy helps us contrast between precise mathematical language that accurately communicates the structure of the problem (but that requires knowledge of the meaning of the mathematical terms), and more commonplace language that is more accessible to students but does not as clearly describe the structure of the problem (and therefore might lead to confusion as students choose solution strategies). As educators, we know there are times when students use more accessible language to help them describe or understand a math task. The goal here is not to always correct students, but to guide them from this informal language to more precise language. This will help ensure the language that educators and students use does not cause confusion but helps students understand the structure of the problem so they can choose appropriate solution strategies for this structure. Review the table below for examples of how imprecise language might cause confusion for students as they choose solution strategies for a given problem.
Using precise language to understand structure: (adapted from practice guide Example 2.3)
| Imprecise language | Precise mathematical language | How does the imprecise language cause confusion for students regarding structure and appropriate solution strategies? |
|---|---|---|
| Move the 5 over. | Subtract 5 from both sides of the equation. | Students might move the quantity from one side of an operation to the other, rather than conducting the inverse operation to both sides of the equation to maintain equality. |
| Solve an expression. | Solve an equation. Rewrite an expression. | Students might attempt to solve an expression by using the operation(s) as the equality sign and manipulate around that sign. |
| The numbers cancel out. | The numbers add to zero. The numbers divide to one. | Students might not realize they need inverse operations to "cancel the numbers out" (e.g., 5+5=10 vs. 5+-5=0). |
Below, you'll see a list of reflective questions for noticing structure. The list presents the kinds of questions educators can use to help students grasp the structure of algebra problems. You can use these questions to help students think about the structure of a math problem and the potential strategies they could use to solve the problem in a variety of ways in the classroom. You may choose to write down questions you consider for a particular math problem and how you might answer them, modeling for students the process of considering reflective questions. Then you might present a problem during whole-class instruction and ask students to write down what questions they might ask themselves to help solve the problem. Students can practice this process in pairs or on their own to help internalize what to consider when approaching a problem.
Using reflective questioning to notice structure
Reflective questions for noticing structure (Practice Guide Example 2.5)
Recognizing and explaining corresponding structural features of two representations of the same problem can help students understand the relationships among different algebraic representations, such as equations, graphs, and word problems. In the table below, you'll see an example of how a educator asks students to compare different forms of equations for the same line. Students may come up with different equations, or educators can present students with equations in different forms so you can ask students to identify similarities and differences. As an alternative, educators can ask students to connect the information provided in various algebraic representations of a math task. Working in pairs, students can then discuss the similarities and differences they identified or the connections they made.
Multiple algebraic representations
| Equations of the same line in different forms (Practice Guide Example 2.6) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Compare different forms of equation for the same line. | ||
| Similarities | Differences | |
| Slope-intercept form
y=mx+b y=2x-3 |
Both are equations of straight lines.
In both equations, you can identify the slope without any calculation or manipulation. You cannot identify the x-intercept without manipulating the equations. |
Slope-intercept form allows you to identify the y-intercept without manipulation. |
| Point-slope form
y-y1=m(x+x1) y-5=2(x-4) |
Point-slope form allows you to identify a point on the line without manipulation. | |
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Pre-session work, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
Learn about and reflect on the content that will be covered in Module 2 before your first PLC session. This pre-session work will take approximately 60 minutes to complete .
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 1, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 1, participants will:

Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Between-session work, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
Complete this between-session work before PLC Session 2. All steps will take approximately 60 minutes to complete.

Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 2, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 2, participant will:

Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Between-session work, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
Complete this between-session work before PLC Session 3. All steps will take approximately 60 minutes to complete.
Review each of the data tools linked below or in the Participant Workbook PDF (1 MB).
Implementation data tools:
Outcome data tools:
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 3, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 3, participants will:
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Between-session work, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
Complete this between-session work before PLC Session 4. All steps will take approximately 120 minutes to complete.

Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 4, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 4, participants will:
Congratulations on completing your Module 2 PDSA cycle! Now you can refine your instructional strategies regarding using the structure of algebraic representations. Please find the full PDSA tool in Appendix A of the Toolkit Introduction Participant Workbook PDF (2 MB) or available for download here PDF (116 KB). Using your completed Act phase of Handout 2I, create a new plan for implementation using the PDSA Tool based on the data-informed revisions you noted above and continue a new cycle of implementation.
As you continue to integrate Recommendation 2 into your teaching, consider what supports you need from your PLC members and other members of your school community. This might involve scheduling collaborative planning or visitation time with PLC members to discuss how to incorporate Recommendation 2 into lessons, share successful strategies, and observe each other's implementation. You also might solicit feedback from administrators, colleagues, and students on the effectiveness of your implementation of Recommendation 2, using some of the data tools in the Participant Workbook PDF (1 MB) appendices C1, C2, and C3, as well as structuring more uses of the student assessment tools in appendix C4.
Continue to draw from the guidance for implementation shown in Handout 2C to identify approaches to integrating the structure of algebraic representations effectively into your lessons and classroom environment. This might include adding visual supports to your classroom to promote the use of precise language that reflects algebraic structure, such as word walls or color-coded mathematical expressions, that you can then refer to across many lessons. It might include displaying standard reflection questions that you return to and structure student use of in considering different problems. It might include displays of the various representations one could use to show algebraic structure (e.g., written, verbal, pictorial, manipulatives, graphs, diagrams), with prompts for some of the advantages and disadvantages of each. Understanding algebraic structure involves applying a complex set of skills that educators must approach and reinforce across topics, assessments, lessons, and units, in many different ways.

When you are ready to move to Module 3, select the Next button below.
By the end of Module 3, participants will:
Teach students to intentionally choose from alternative algebraic strategies when solving problems.
—Teaching Strategies for Improving Algebra Knowledge in Middle and High School Students, p. 26
Students benefit from learning multiple solution strategies to apply to algebraic problem solving. Strategies are more general and abstract than memorized algorithms. Learning multiple solution strategies, and learning how to compare and choose between them, helps students develop flexibility in solving problems. This recommendation can help students develop their problem-solving skills beyond the memorization of one approach, allowing them to extend their knowledge and think more abstractly. Instructional strategies within the recommendation have been shown to improve students' procedural flexibility, while also helping them develop procedural and conceptual knowledge.
To achieve this purpose, the practice guide includes three instructional strategies educators can implement in their classrooms:
Based on the research evidence, these strategies are most effective when implemented once students have some fluency with algebra procedures and strategies. Although this recommendation promotes the understanding and use of multiple solution strategies, the recommendation does not advocate that all students be fluent in all possible strategies for solving a given problem type. Learning alternative strategies can empower students to select from different options when they encounter a problem. However, to avoid overwhelming students, be sure to introduce one solution strategy at a time and provide sufficient time to practice before introducing new strategies.
A strategy involves a general approach for accomplishing a task or solving a problem. It may require students to make choices based on the specifics of the problem. Strategies are general and broadly applicable, making them useful in solving a variety of problems. Conversely, an algorithm is a sequence of steps that are intended to be executed in a particular order with little or no flexibility. Students are often taught algorithms designed to accomplish specific algebraic tasks and, as a result, may think of solving algebraic problems as merely executing a set of algorithms to arrive at the correct answer. However, this process does not support developing their conceptual understanding nor their procedural flexibility.
To intentionally choose between alternative solution strategies, students should consider the strategy's validity, efficiency, and fit.
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Pre-session work, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
Learn about and reflect on the content that will be covered in Module 3 before your first PLC session. This pre-session work will take approximately 60 minutes to complete.
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 1, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 1, participants will:
To get a sense of what the instructional strategies could look and feel like in your classroom setting and to begin thinking about different ways you could incorporate each into your existing instructional strategies and lesson material, consider one of the following handouts.
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Between-session work, click the Next button below or select the tab in menu at the top of the page.
Complete this between-session work before PLC Session 2. All steps will take approximately 60 minutes to complete.
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 2, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 2, participants will:

Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Between-session work, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
Complete this between-session work before PLC Session 3. All steps will take approximately 60 minutes to complete.
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 3, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 3, participants will:
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Between-session work, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
Complete this between-session work before PLC Session 4. All steps will take approximately 120 minutes to complete.

Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 4, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 4, participants will:
Congratulations on completing your Module 3 PDSA cycle! Now you can refine your instructional strategies regarding using alternative solution strategies in your instruction. Please find the full PDSA tool in Appendix A of the Toolkit Introduction Participant Workbook PDF (2 MB) or available for download here PDF (116 KB). Using your completed Act phase of Handout 3L, create a new plan for implementation using the PDSA Tool based on the data-informed revisions you noted above and continue a new cycle of implementation.
As you continue to integrate Recommendation 3 into your teaching, consider what supports you need from your PLC members and other members of your school community. This might involve scheduling collaborative planning or visitation time with PLC members to discuss how to incorporate Recommendation 3 into lessons, share successful strategies, and observe each other's implementation. You also might solicit feedback from administrators, colleagues, and students on the effectiveness of your implementation of Recommendation 3, using some of the data tools in the Participant Workbook PDF (2 MB) appendices D1, D2, and D3, and structuring more uses of the student assessment tools in appendix D4. Continue to draw from the guidance for implementation shown in Handouts 3E and 3F to identify approaches to teaching students to intentionally choose from alternative algebraic strategies.

When you are ready to move to Module 4, select the Next button below.
By the end of this final module, participants will be able to:
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Pre-session work, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
Now that you have completed Modules 1 through 3, you (and your students) will use these materials to complete an integrated self-reflection and goal-setting activity. This pre-work is designed to help you reflect on your use of the algebra teaching instructional strategies you learned about in Modules 1 through 3 and set goals for sustaining the practices for the remainder of the school year and beyond.
To help you identify areas of strength and areas for improvement, this pre-work also provides an activity to facilitate with students to get their perspectives on the instructional strategies. This is not designed as a test or an evaluation. Rather, it is meant to support you in deepening and sustaining the changes embarked upon in Modules 1 through 3.
Refer to Handout 4B: Cards for card sort in the Module 4 Participant Workbook PDF (1 MB).
Algebra teaching instructional strategies card sort activity (30 minutes).
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 1, click the Next button below or select the tab in the menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 1, participants will:
For those instructional strategies you implemented least frequently and feel the least confident implementing, consider why that is.
For those instructional strategies you feel most confident implementing, what were some of the times that you felt especially successful with one of these instructional strategies? Can you provide an example of a key success story that you experienced when using this instructional strategy? What were the pieces of evidence that helped you see this as a success story?
For those instructional strategies you think are the best for improving student learning, can you share an example to help demonstrate students’ improvement as a result of using one of the strategies? What is some of your evidence for coming to this conclusion?
Now that you have reflected on your own practice, revisit your summary of how students responded to the card sort activity. Share with colleagues your responses to the two questions below:
Discussion
Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, Between-session work, click the Next button below or select the tab in menu at the top of the page.
Complete this between-session work before PLC Session 2.

Continue your work in this module by moving through the tabs from left to right. When you are ready to move to the next section, PLC Session 2, click the Next button below or select the tab in menu at the top of the page.
By the end of PLC Session 2, participants will:
Review and finalize action planning in Handout 4C:
Key questions to guide discussion:
Congratulations on completing the toolkit! This challenging and complex process of professional development hopefully has left you with new insights into evidence-based algebra instruction, new tools for instructional improvement and collaboration, and goals and action steps for continued improvement and professional growth. Now you move forward with the action plans and collective goals that you and the other team members have developed and refined.
As you move forward with these plans and goals, consider what supports you need from your PLC members and other members of your school community. This might involve scheduling next step meetings—during the school year, over the summer, or early in the coming school year—to identify progress on the action plans, share successful strategies in continuing to implement the recommended instructional strategies, and observe each other’s implementation, move ahead with additional PDSA cycles, or collaboratively plan. You also might continue to solicit feedback from school leaders, colleagues, and students on the effectiveness of your implementation of the recommendations and the steps you have taken to move ahead with action plans. Consider continuing to return all the tools, handouts, and resources found in the toolkit as support and sources of feedback.
Handout 4E: Reflections for school leaders supporting toolkit team action plans in the Module 4 Participant Workbook PDF (1 MB) provides guidance for reflection to share with school leaders as they support the team in moving forward to implement their goals and plans. Take some time to fill in sections you feel are appropriate or simply use these as prompt to share your thoughts and reflections with your school leader about the process of implementing the Algebra Toolkit this year.

Access all toolkit materials
Toolkit Facilitator Guides
Toolkit Participant Workbooks
School Leader Guide: Institutionalizing Supports PDF (1 MB)
Ingredient List PDF (141 KB)
PDSA Tool PDF (116 KB)
Implementation Data Tools
Educator Self-Reflection Tools
Classroom Visitation Tools
Outcome Data Tools
Student Surveys
Student Knowledge Assessment Tools
Facilitator's Guide PDF (2 MB)
Participant Workbook PDF (2 MB)
Facilitator's Guide PDF (2 MB)
Participant Workbook PDF (2 MB)
Data Tools
Facilitator's Guide PDF (1 MB)
Participant Workbook PDF (1 MB)
Data Tools
Facilitator's Guide PDF (2 MB)
Participant Workbook PDF (2 MB)
Data Tools
Facilitator's Guide PDF (1 MB)
Participant Workbook PDF (1 MB)
The resources in the School Leader Guide: Institutionalizing Supports ( PDF (1 MB)) are designed to provide school leaders with an overview of the Algebra Toolkit along with guidance on how to support educators in working through the toolkit modules. You, as school leaders, are crucial for the uptake and success of school-level changes, and the resources in this guide play a key role in providing you with the necessary information to understand how, when, and with whom to implement the toolkit.
In addition to school and district leader support, effective implementation of the Algebra Toolkit also requires the necessary resources. Learn more in:
Resources needed to implement the Algebra Toolkit PDF (141 KB)
These resources are intended to be reviewed and used on your own schedule. As the Algebra Toolkit is intended for a group of in-service teachers and a facilitator to work through over the course of a single school year, it will be useful to review these resources before the school year begins, and then to return to them again throughout the year as needed. As suits your schedule, you can review them all at once to get a full picture of the ways a school leader can support changes in algebra instruction. Alternatively, you could spread them out over several weeks or months, but we recommend engaging with the resources before you and the toolkit facilitator launch your school's professional learning community (PLC). Your familiarity with these resources will help you set up an effective toolkit experience alongside the facilitator.
Download the School Leader Guide for answers to:
The School Leader Guide also includes a reflection activity. As your teachers get started, you can complete the reflections in this activity to think about how to effectively support them in this journey.