Reference Resources iconReview Protocols
Download Document (214 KB)

A better understanding of CTE interventions is critical because there has been a growing demand for workers with postsecondary education and training - and those with a high school diploma or less have struggled to find and keep jobs with middle-class wages (Acemoglu & Autor, 2011; Carnevale, Jayasundera, & Hanson, 2012; Carnevale, Jayasundera, & Gulish, 2016; Rosen, Visher, & Beal, 2018). Meanwhile, rising requirements for skilled service and blue-collar industry workers have resulted in employer demand for better alignment between technical education and industry needs (Carnevale, Cheah, Ridley, & Strohl, 2017). In this environment, attention from researchers and policymakers has led to significant investments to improve postsecondary CTE, which can potentially increase postsecondary attainment and earnings while also building the workforce's skills needed in occupations currently in demand.

WWC reviews in this topic area focus on postsecondary CTE interventions that help students achieve technical skill proficiency and/or an industry-recognized credential, a certificate, a license, an associate degree, or in the longer term, a baccalaureate degree. The primary goal of these interventions is to improve labor market outcomes, including employment and earnings. Systematic reviews of evidence in this topic area address the following questions:

  • Which CTE interventions are effective at helping students progress toward the completion of an industry-recognized credential, a license, a certificate, or a postsecondary degree?
  • Which CTE interventions are effective at helping students obtain an associate or a baccalaureate degree?
  • Which CTE interventions are effective at helping students obtain an industry-recognized credential, a license, or a certificate?
  • Which CTE interventions are effective at helping students achieve technical skill proficiency?
  • Which CTE interventions are effective at helping students obtain and/or retain employment?
  • Which CTE interventions are effective at increasing earnings?



Protocol Details

  • Version: 4.0
  • Released: August 2019

What is a Protocol?

A review protocol defines the scope of a systematic review. Developed with substantive experts, the protocol defines the parameters for the review, including the research, populations, settings, and outcomes. The protocol also specifies details of the literature search and any topic-specific applications of the design standards.

Protocol versions reflect the version of WWC standards in effect when the protocol was released. Protocol versions that predate the current version of the WWC standards handbook can be used to identify acceptable outcome domains for review within a given topic. The current WWC standards are used to guide the review of studies with acceptable outcomes.

Connect With the WWC

loading
back to top