WWC review of this study

Transfer among phonological manipulation skills.

Slocum, T. A., O'Connor, R. E., & Jenkins, J. R. (1993b). Journal of Educational Psychology, 85 (4), 618–630. (Study: segment-then-blend intervention versus word manipulation-then-blend comparison group.).

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
     examining 
    19
     Students
    , grade
    PK
At least one statistically significant positive finding
Meets WWC standards with reservations

Reviewed: December 2006

Phonological processing outcomes—Statistically significant positive effects found
Outcome
measure
Comparison Period Sample Intervention
mean
Comparison
mean
Significant? Improvement
index

Onset-rime segmenting

Phonological Awareness Training vs. Word manipulation

Posttest

Preschool children;
19 students

8.78

1

Yes

 
 
50
More Outcomes

Onset-rime blending

Phonological Awareness Training vs. Word manipulation

Posttest

Preschool children;
19 students

0.53

0.7

No

--

Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.


  • Female: 43%
    Male: 57%
  • Race
    Asian
    14%
    Black
    77%
    White
    9%

  • Urban
    • B
    • A
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • I
    • H
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • P
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • V
    • U
    • T
    • W
    • X
    • Z
    • Y
    • a
    • h
    • i
    • b
    • d
    • e
    • f
    • c
    • g
    • j
    • k
    • l
    • m
    • n
    • o
    • p
    • q
    • r
    • s
    • t
    • u
    • x
    • w
    • y

    West

Setting

The study took place in four Head Start preschool classrooms in an urban area of the Pacific Northwest.

Study sample

Slocum et al. (1993a, b). The study began with 48 low-income preschool children randomly assigned to two intervention and two comparison conditions. Thirteen children left the preschools over the course of the study, leaving a sample of 35 children in the four groups. Children in special education were excluded from the study sample. The mean age of the child participants was 5.2 years. Fifty-seven percent were female, 77% were Black, 14% were Asian, and 9% were Caucasian. Slocum et al. (1993b). Results for the 19 children who had been randomly assigned to the segment-then-blend intervention group and the word manipulation-then-blend comparison group are included in this report.

Intervention Group

The study included two phases. Children in the segment-then-blend intervention group were taught segmenting during phase one and blending during phase two. Children were taught how to blend using auditory blending instruction. Instruction was one-on-one, lasted about 10 minutes per session, and continued until the child achieved mastery, which was defined as responding correctly to four of five items in a set of items for two days in a row. The WWC only includes the results from the phase one instructional period in this report because there was no appropriate comparison condition to estimate effects of training at the completion of phase two training.

Comparison Group

Children in the word manipulation-then-blend comparison group were taught word manipulation in phase one and blending in phase two. Comparison group children were randomly matched with intervention group children, and they participated in word manipulation activities until their intervention group counterpart achieved mastery in his or her first instructional phase. Instruction was one-on-one and lasted about 10 minutes per session.

Outcome descriptions

The primary outcome domain was children’s phonological processing, which was assessed with two nonstandardized measures of onset-rime blending and onset-rime segmenting. (See Appendix A2.2 for more detailed descriptions of outcome measures.)

Support for implementation

The intervention was implemented by six graduate students in education. They were trained in the instructional procedures until they could deliver the instruction to adults with 100% accuracy. After training, they practiced with nonstudy children until they reached 100% accuracy.

In the case of multiple manuscripts that report on one study, the WWC selects one manuscript as the primary citation and lists other manuscripts that describe the study as additional sources.

  • Slocum, T. A. (1992). The learning and transfer of two phonemic manipulation skills. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52 (08), 2889A. (UMI No. 9203306).

 

Your export should download shortly as a zip archive.

This download will include data files for study and findings review data and a data dictionary.

Connect With the WWC

loading
back to top