WWC review of this study

Middle School Mathematics Professional Development Impact Study: Findings After the First Year of Implementation. NCEE 2010-4009

Garet, Michael S.; Wayne, Andrew J.; Stancavage, Fran; Taylor, James; Walters, Kirk; Song, Mengli; Brown, Seth; Hurlburt, Steven; Zhu, Pei; Sepanik, Susan; Doolittle, Fred (2010). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509306

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
     examining 
    4,528
     Students
    , grade
    7

Reviewed: September 2018

Does not meet WWC standards


Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Study sample characteristics were not reported.

Reviewed: September 2010

Meets WWC standards without reservations


Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.


  • 13% English language learners

  • Female: 49%
    Male: 51%

  • Suburban, Urban
  • Race
    Asian
    2%
    Black
    37%
    Other or unknown
    3%
    White
    32%
  • Ethnicity
    Hispanic    
    26%
    Not Hispanic or Latino    
    74%

Reviewed: August 2010

At least one finding shows promising evidence of effectiveness
At least one statistically significant positive finding
Meets WWC standards without reservations
General Mathematics Achievement outcomes—Statistically significant positive effect found for the domain
Outcome
measure
Comparison Period Sample Intervention
mean
Comparison
mean
Significant? Improvement
    index
Evidence
tier

Teacher Knowledge total

Middle School Mathematics Professional Development vs. Business as usual

Spring Posttest

Full;
189 students

0.31

0.13

No

--

Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Measures of Academic Progress (MAP): Total Score

Middle School Mathematics Professional Development vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Full;
4,528 students

217.09

216.57

No

--

Fractions and decimals subscale

Middle School Mathematics Professional Development vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Full;
4,528 students

215.41

214.89

No

--

Ratio and proportion subscale

Middle School Mathematics Professional Development vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Full;
4,528 students

218.73

218.26

No

--
Teacher instruction outcomes—Statistically significant positive effect found for the domain
Outcome
measure
Comparison Period Sample Intervention
mean
Comparison
mean
Significant? Improvement
    index
Evidence
tier

Teacher Elicits Student Thinking

Middle School Mathematics Professional Development vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Full;
179 students

1.30

0.94

Yes

 
 
18
 

Teacher Uses Representations

Middle School Mathematics Professional Development vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Full;
179 students

0.75

0.37

No

--

Teacher Knowledge: SK score

Middle School Mathematics Professional Development vs. Business as usual

Spring Posttest

Full;
189 students

0.29

0.03

No

--

Teacher Focuses on Mathematical Reasoning

Middle School Mathematics Professional Development vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Full;
179 students

0.09

0.00

No

--

Teacher Knowledge: CK score

Middle School Mathematics Professional Development vs. Business as usual

Spring Posttest

Full;
189 students

0.40

0.37

No

--


Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.


  • Female: 49%
    Male: 51%

  • Rural, Suburban, Urban
    • B
    • A
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • I
    • H
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • P
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • V
    • U
    • T
    • W
    • X
    • Z
    • Y
    • a
    • h
    • i
    • b
    • d
    • e
    • f
    • c
    • g
    • j
    • k
    • l
    • m
    • n
    • o
    • p
    • q
    • r
    • s
    • t
    • u
    • x
    • w
    • y

    Midwest, Northeast, South, West
  • Race
    Asian
    3%
    Black
    36%
    Other or unknown
    1%
    White
    34%
  • Ethnicity
    Hispanic    
    25%
    Not Hispanic or Latino    
    75%
 

Your export should download shortly as a zip archive.

This download will include data files for study and findings review data and a data dictionary.

Connect With the WWC

loading
back to top