WWC review of this study

Mathematics Learned by Young Children in An Intervention Based on Learning Trajectories: A Large-Scale Cluster Randomized Trial [Building Blocks vs. business as usual (Where Bright Futures Begin or Opening the World of Learning)]

Clements, Douglas H.; Sarama, Julie; Spitler, Mary Elaine; Lange, Alissa A.; Wolfe, Christopher B. (2011). Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, v42 n2 p127-166 Mar 2011. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ918252

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
     examining 
    1,305
     Students
    , grade
    PK

Reviewed: September 2023

At least one finding shows strong evidence of effectiveness
At least one statistically significant positive finding
Meets WWC standards without reservations
Mathematics outcomes—Statistically significant positive effect found for the domain
Outcome
measure
Comparison Period Sample Intervention
mean
Comparison
mean
Significant? Improvement
    index
Evidence
tier

Research-Based Early Mathematics Assessment (REMA)

Building Blocks™ vs. Business as usual

0 Days

Full sample ;
1,305 students

52.40

44.01

Yes

 
 
18
 


Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.


  • 14% English language learners

  • Female: 51%
    Male: 49%

  • Urban
  • Race
    Asian
    4%
    Black
    53%
    Native American
    2%
    Other or unknown
    22%
    White
    19%
  • Ethnicity
    Hispanic    
    22%
    Other or unknown    
    78%
  • Eligible for Free and Reduced Price Lunch
    Free or reduced price lunch (FRPL)    
    85%
    No FRPL    
    15%

Setting

The study was conducted in two urban public school districts and 106 pre-kindergarten classrooms. The classrooms were located in 42 schools in low-resource communities.

Study sample

Approximately 51% of the students were female, 85% were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, and 14% were English learners. 53% of the children were African American, 19% were White, 4% were Asian, 2% were American Indian, and 22% did not report race. 22% were Hispanic or Latino and 78% did not report ethnicity.

Intervention Group

The Building Blocks curriculum was implemented in the second year of the study, after teachers received professional development and encouraged to incorporate elements of the curriculum in the first year. The Building Blocks approach develops mathematics from children's experiences and interests; they are guided to extend from everyday activities such as block building and puzzles. Building Blocks helps teachers understand children's developmental progressions (learning trajectories) and connects these progressions to instructional tasks. Topics covered by the Building Blocks curriculum include communicating, reasoning, representing, problem solving, number and shape composition, and patterning.

Comparison Group

Both districts focused more on mathematics during the study period, and both implemented new programs. One district implemented Where Bright Futures Begin, with a mathematics component that had specific number learning and measurement goals. Topics including counting, recognizing numbers and shapes, measurement, patterning, and graphing. Mathematics materials included concept cards, counters, and cubes, and mathematics was primarily taught during small group time. The second district implemented Opening the World of Learning, with topics such as number concepts, one-to-one correspondence, geometry, and measurement. Teachers were provided professional development in approximately six sessions over 2 years. Three teachers in the comparison condition mentioned combining curriculums with DLM Early Childhood Express, of which the mathematics component was an earlier version of the Building Blocks curriculum. There was also the possibility of spillover in the first district, with the district holding summer training sessions for teachers (some of whom were in the comparison condition) on the Building Blocks curriculum.

Support for implementation

Teachers in the Building Blocks condition received 8 days of professional development in the first year and an additional 5 days of professional development in the second year. Professional development included viewing, analyzing, and discussing video enactments of instructional tasks. During professional development sessions, teachers practiced interpreting children's thinking and choosing appropriate instructional tasks for the class. In addition, teachers had mentors who observed and supported implementation, visiting classrooms about twice per month. Intervention teachers were evaluated on the fidelity of their implementation of the Building Blocks. However, it is not clear whether any follow-up with teachers occurred on the basis of the evaluations.

In the case of multiple manuscripts that report on one study, the WWC selects one manuscript as the primary citation and lists other manuscripts that describe the study as additional sources.

  • Dumas, D., McNeish, D., Sarama, J., & Clements, D. (2019). Preschool Mathematics Intervention Can Significantly Improve Student Learning Trajectories Through Elementary School. AERA Open, 5(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419879446.

  • Sarama, Julie; Lange, Alissa A.; Clements, Douglas H.; Wolfe, Christopher B. (2012). The Impacts of an Early Mathematics Curriculum on Oral Language and Literacy. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, v27 n3 p489-502 3rd Qtr.

  • Watts, Tyler W.; Duncan, Greg J.; Clements, Douglas H.; Sarama, Julie. (2018). What Is the Long-Run Impact of Learning Mathematics during Preschool?. Child Development, v89 n2 p539-555.

  • Schenke, Katerina; Nguyen, Tutrang; Watts, Tyler W.; Sarama, Julie; Clements, Douglas H. (2017). Differential Effects of the Classroom on African American and Non-African American's Mathematics Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, v109 n6 p794-811.

Reviewed: November 2013

Meets WWC standards without reservations


Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.


  • Female: 51%
    Male: 49%

  • Urban
  • Race
    Asian
    4%
    Black
    53%
    Native American
    2%
    White
    19%
  • Ethnicity
    Hispanic    
    22%
    Not Hispanic or Latino    
    78%
 

Your export should download shortly as a zip archive.

This download will include data files for study and findings review data and a data dictionary.

Connect With the WWC

loading
back to top