WWC review of this study

Impact of a Social-Emotional and Character Development Program on School-Level Indicators of Academic Achievement, Absenteeism, and Disciplinary Outcomes: A Matched-Pair, Cluster-Randomized, Controlled Trial

Snyder, Frank; Flay, Brian; Vuchinich, Samuel; Acock, Alan; Washburn, Isaac; Beets, Michael; Li, Kin-Kit (2010). Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, v3 n1 p26-55 2010. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ877222

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
     examining 
    20
     Schools
    , grades
    K-6

Reviewed: April 2023



Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Study sample characteristics were not reported.

Reviewed: January 2023

No statistically significant positive
findings
Meets WWC standards without reservations
Academic achievement outcomes—Indeterminate effect found for the domain
Outcome
measure
Comparison Period Sample Intervention
mean
Comparison
mean
Significant? Improvement
    index
Evidence
tier

Hawaii Content and Performance Standards test (HCPS): Math (percentage reaching proficiency)

Positive Action (PA) vs. Business as usual

1 Year

Grade: 4; 2007 outcomes;
18 schools

41.89

26.67

No

--

Hawaii Content and Performance Standards test (HCPS): Math (percentage reaching proficiency)

Positive Action (PA) vs. Business as usual

1 Year

Grade: 4; 2006 outcome;
18 schools

26.56

17.44

No

--

Hawaii Content and Performance Standards test (HCPS): Reading (percentage reaching proficiency)

Positive Action (PA) vs. Business as usual

1 Year

Grade: 4; 2006 outcomes;
18 schools

44.33

37.22

No

--

Hawaii Content and Performance Standards test (HCPS): Reading (percentage reaching proficiency)

Positive Action (PA) vs. Business as usual

1 Year

Grade: 4; 2007 outcomes;
18 schools

56.89

47.78

No

--

Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition (SAT-9), Reading Subtest

Positive Action (PA) vs. Business as usual

1 Year

Grade: 5; 2006 outcomes;
18 schools

78.12

71.89

No

--

TerraNova 2nd Edition, Math

Positive Action (PA) vs. Business as usual

1 Year

Grade: 5; 2007 outcomes;
18 schools

75.52

69.44

No

--

TerraNova 2nd Edition, Reading

Positive Action (PA) vs. Business as usual

1 Year

Grade: 5; 2007 outcomes;
18 schools

74.33

68.00

No

--

Stanford Achievement Test, Ninth Edition (SAT 9) - Math

Positive Action (PA) vs. Business as usual

1 Year

Grade: 5; 2006 outcome;
18 schools

82.53

78.77

No

--

Absenteeism

Positive Action (PA) vs. Business as usual

1 Year

Grade: K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 2006 outcomes;
20 schools

10.01

11.64

No

--

Absenteeism

Positive Action (PA) vs. Business as usual

1 Year

Grade: K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 2007 outcomes;
20 schools

10.17

11.78

No

--

Grade retention

Positive Action (PA) vs. Business as usual

1 Year

Grade: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 2006 outcomes;
20 schools

0.40

1.00

No

--

Grade retention

Positive Action (PA) vs. Business as usual

1 Year

Grade: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 2007 outcomes;
20 schools

0.30

1.10

No

--
Behavior outcomes—Substantively important positive effect found for the domain
Outcome
measure
Comparison Period Sample Intervention
mean
Comparison
mean
Significant? Improvement
    index
Evidence
tier

Suspensions

Positive Action (PA) vs. Business as usual

1 Year

Grade: K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 2006 outcomes;
20 schools

0.67

1.72

No

--

Suspensions

Positive Action (PA) vs. Business as usual

1 Year

Grade: K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 2007 outcomes;
20 schools

0.84

2.53

No

--


Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.


  • 14% English language learners
    • B
    • A
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • I
    • H
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • P
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • V
    • U
    • T
    • W
    • X
    • Z
    • Y
    • a
    • h
    • i
    • b
    • d
    • e
    • f
    • c
    • g
    • j
    • k
    • l
    • m
    • n
    • o
    • p
    • q
    • r
    • s
    • t
    • u
    • x
    • w
    • y

    Hawaii
  • Race
    Other or unknown
    100%

Setting

The study was conducted in 20 public elementary (K-5 or K-6) schools (10 matched-pairs) on three Hawai‘ian islands. The schools were located the islands of O‘ahu, Maui, or Moloka‘i. The schools all had low annual mobility, were in the lower 3 quartiles of the state's standardized test scores, and an annual mobility rate less than 20%. The majority of the students were Asian or Pacific Islanders. Schools that were academy, charter or special education schools were excluded from the pool.

Study sample

The majority of the students in the schools were Asian or Pacific Islanders. Across the 5 study years, between 50 and 60 percent of the students in the schools received free or reduced-price lunch, 11 to 16 percent of the students had limited English proficiency, and 9 to 11 percent of students received special education services.

Intervention Group

The Positive Action (PA) program is a school wide social-emotional and character development (SACD) program designed to improve academic achievement and student behaviors. The PA program includes classroom curricula, a school wide climate development component, teacher/staff training, a manual for the principal, a school counselor’s program, a coordinator/committee guide, and family- and community-involvement programs. The curriculum contains 140 lessons per grade, per academic year, which teachers use in 15 to 20 minute lessons. The total time of exposure for students was approximately 35 hours over 35 weeks. The major units are self-concept, physical and intellectual actions, physical activity, social/emotional actions for managing oneself responsibly, being honest with yourself and others, and continuous self-improvement. The study schools reported their level of implementation of PA as between 3.0 and 3.2 on average (depending on the year) on a scale of 1 (never) to 5 (always). The authors considered the implementation adequate for each indicator. Teachers reported spending 55.1 min/week on PA with additional time spent on other SACD programs for a total of 143 minutes per week on SACD-related activities. The intervention schools reported implementing an average of 4.2 SACD programs besides PA.

Comparison Group

The comparison condition was business-as-usual. Teachers in comparison schools reported spending an average of 108 minutes per week on activities related to the SACD. Comparison schools reported implementing an average of 10.2 SACD programs. Beginning in 2007, the follow-up year for the study, 3 comparison schools began implementing PA.

Support for implementation

Prior to the start of each school year, administrators, teachers, support staff attended training sessions (3-4 hours in year 1 and 1-2 hours in subsequent years) conducted by the developer. All teachers were trained. The Hawaiian project coordinator also provided annual booster sessions lasting about 30 to 50 minutes and mini-conferences with leaders and staff.

 

Your export should download shortly as a zip archive.

This download will include data files for study and findings review data and a data dictionary.

Connect With the WWC

loading
back to top