WWC review of this study

A Randomized Study of a Literacy-Integrated Science Intervention for Low-Socio-Economic Status Middle School Students: Findings from First-Year Implementation

Tong, Fuhui; Irby, Beverly J.; Lara-Alecio, Rafael; Guerrero, Cindy; Fan, Yinan; Huerta, Margarita (2014). International Journal of Science Education, v36 n12 p2083-2109. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1031475

  • Randomized controlled trial
     examining 
    263
     Students
    , grades
    7-8

Reviewed: February 2016

At least one finding shows promising evidence of effectiveness
At least one statistically significant positive finding
Meets WWC standards without reservations
Science Achievement outcomes—Statistically significant positive effect found for the domain
Outcome
measure
Comparison Period Sample Intervention
mean
Comparison
mean
Significant? Improvement
    index
Evidence
tier

Test 6 (Final) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Aggregate;
263 students

0.98

0.77

Yes

 
 
43
 

Test 2 (Chemistry) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Aggregate;
263 students

0.98

0.84

Yes

 
 
40
 

Test 4 (Earth/Space) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Aggregate;
263 students

0.94

0.77

No

--

Test 3 (Mid-term) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Aggregate;
263 students

0.93

0.76

No

--

TAKS Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Aggregate;
263 students

0.96

0.89

No

--

Test 1 (Physics) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Aggregate;
263 students

0.95

0.91

No

--
Show Supplemental Findings

Test 6 (Final) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Male;
135 students

1.00

0.80

Yes

 
 
50

TAKS Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Male;
135 students

1.00

0.92

Yes

 
 
50

Test 2 (Chemistry) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

African American;
86 students

1.00

0.77

Yes

 
 
50

Test 6 (Final) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Hispanic;
177 students

0.98

0.80

Yes

 
 
45

Test 4 (Earth/Space) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

African American;
86 students

0.96

0.62

Yes

 
 
45

Test 4 (Earth/Space) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Male;
135 students

0.98

0.79

Yes

 
 
43

Test 2 (Chemistry) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Male;
135 students

0.98

0.85

Yes

 
 
40

Test 6 (Final) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

African American;
86 students

0.95

0.72

Yes

 
 
40

Test 3 (Mid-term) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

African American;
86 students

0.91

0.59

Yes

 
 
39

Test 3 (Mid-term) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Male;
135 students

0.96

0.76

Yes

 
 
38

Test 1 (Physics) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

African American;
86 students

0.96

0.80

No

--

TAKS Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

African American;
86 students

0.95

0.78

No

--

Test 2 (Chemistry) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Hispanic;
177 students

0.97

0.88

No

--

Test 4 (Earth/Space) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Hispanic;
177 students

0.94

0.85

No

--

Test 3 (Mid-term) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Hispanic;
177 students

0.94

0.86

No

--

Test 1 (Physics) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Male;
135 students

0.98

0.96

No

--

TAKS Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Hispanic;
177 students

0.97

0.96

No

--

Test 1 (Physics) Passing

Literacy-embedded science vs. Business as usual

Posttest

Hispanic;
177 students

0.95

0.97

No

--


Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.


  • Female: 49%
    Male: 51%
    • B
    • A
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • I
    • H
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • P
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • V
    • U
    • T
    • W
    • X
    • Z
    • Y
    • a
    • h
    • i
    • b
    • d
    • e
    • f
    • c
    • g
    • j
    • k
    • l
    • m
    • n
    • o
    • p
    • q
    • r
    • s
    • t
    • u
    • x
    • w
    • y

    Texas
  • Race
    Black
    33%
  • Ethnicity
    Hispanic    
    67%
 

Your export should download shortly as a zip archive.

This download will include data files for study and findings review data and a data dictionary.

Connect With the WWC

loading
back to top