WWC review of this study

Improving learning disabled students’ skills at composing essays: Self-instructional strategy training

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1989). Exceptional Children, 56(3), 201–214. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ400693

  • Single Case Design
     examining 
    3
     Students
    , grade
    6

To view the detailed study findings from this review, please see  Self-Regulated Strategy Development Intervention Report -Students with a Specific Learning Disability (841 KB)

Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.


  • Female: 67%
    Male: 33%

  • Suburban
    • B
    • A
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • I
    • H
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • P
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • V
    • U
    • T
    • W
    • X
    • Z
    • Y
    • a
    • h
    • i
    • b
    • d
    • e
    • f
    • c
    • g
    • j
    • k
    • l
    • m
    • n
    • o
    • p
    • q
    • r
    • s
    • t
    • u
    • x
    • w
    • y

    Northeast

Setting

The study took place in one suburban elementary school in the northeastern United States. The intervention was administered individually to each student in a quiet room within the elementary school.

Study sample

The study sample included three sixth-grade students who were identified as having LD by their district and were receiving special education services in a resource room. Elaine was a 12-year-old girl with an IQ of 101 on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R). She scored at least 3 years below grade level in math, writing, and knowledge achievement. Morgane was a 12-year-old girl with an IQ score of 89 on the Slossom Intelligence Test. She scored 2 years below grade level in reading. Arthur was a 12-year-old boy with an IQ of 99 on the WISC-R. He also scored 2 years below grade level in reading and math achievement and had repeated third grade.

Intervention

SRSD, referred to as self-instructional strategy training procedures in this study, was administered individually to students to help improve their writing skills. The instructor, a graduate student majoring in special education, first worked with each student to define the components of a good essay using a mnemonic device (TREE) which prompted students to think of a topic sentence, reasons, examples, and an ending. The instructor then reviewed the student’s current level of essay writing and discussed goals. Next, the instructor presented a three-step essay-writing strategy to the student (Think, Plan, Write) and modeled for the student how to use the strategy. Next, the student memorized the strategy and practiced self-regulation. The instructor and the student then worked together to write an essay using the strategy. Finally, the student wrote essays independently. Elaine, Morgane, and Arthur participated in seven, five, and eight SRSD training sessions, respectively. Each session lasted approximately 40 minutes. Post-training essay probes were administered immediately following SRSD instruction.

Comparison

The study used a multiple probe design across three students. During the baseline condition for each student, the graduate student instructor asked students to write essays on a specific topic or in response to a picture. General procedures were in effect in the resource room during this period.

Support for implementation

The instructor received training on the step-by-step implementation procedures and received detailed lesson plans with guidance on how to conduct each step.

 

Your export should download shortly as a zip archive.

This download will include data files for study and findings review data and a data dictionary.

Connect With the WWC

loading
back to top