Study: 85774

Science Teachers Learning from Lesson Analysis (STeLLA) Intervention Report - Science

Review Details

Reviewed: April 2021

At least one finding shows strong evidence of effectiveness

At least one statistically significant positive finding

Meets WWC standards without reservations

For:

Science Teachers Learning from Lesson Analysis (STeLLA) Intervention Report - Science

Using:

Rating:

Meets WWC standards without reservations because it is a cluster randomized controlled trial with low cluster-level attrition and individual-level non-response.

This review may not reflect the full body of research evidence for this intervention.

Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Please see the WWC summary of evidence for Science Teachers Learning from Lesson Analysis (STeLLA).

Findings

Science Achievement outcomes—Statistically significant positive effect found for the domain
Outcome measure	Comparison	Period	Sample	Intervention mean	Comparison mean	Significant?	Improvement index	Evidence tier
Researcher-developed science content knowledge test	Science Teachers Learning from Lesson Analysis (STeLLA) vs. Business as usual	2 Weeks	Full sample; 2,823 students	56.28	50.17	Yes	25

Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Sample Characteristics

Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.

12% English language learners
Female: 48%
Male: 52%
Rural, Suburban, Urban
- B
- A
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- I
- H
- J
- K
- L
- P
- M
- N
- O
- Q
- R
- S
- V
- U
- T
- W
- X
- Z
- Y
- a
- h
- i
- b
- d
- e
- f
- c
- g
- j
- k
- l
- m
- n
- o
- p
- q
- r
- s
- t
- u
- v
- x
- w
- y
Colorado

Race
Asian		2%
Black		4%
Other or unknown		35%
White		59%

Ethnicity
Hispanic		28%
Not Hispanic or Latino		72%

Study Details

Setting

The study took place during science instruction in fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms in 77 public elementary schools in urban, suburban, and rural areas of Colorado. The sample consisted of traditional public schools and excluded charter and magnet schools. The study authors did not specify the number of districts.

Study sample

The study sample included 2,823 students (1,485 in the intervention group and 1,338 in the comparison group) in fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms in the participating schools. In the participating schools, 52% of students were male, 59% of the students were White, 4% were Black, 2% were Asian, and 28% were Hispanic, on average. Twelve percent of students in the participating schools had limited English proficiency, and 43% qualified for free or reduced-price lunch, on average.

Intervention Group

Science Teachers Learning through Lesson Analysis (STeLLA®) is a professional development program, developed by BSCS Science Learning, that aims to improve students’ science achievement by improving teachers’ science content knowledge and their abilities to (a) explain science concepts to students, (b) clearly identify to students the science concepts used in student learning activities, and (c) engage students in thinking about science. Over the course of 1 school year, teachers in the intervention group participated in the STeLLA® professional development program, starting with a 2-week summer institute (approximately 60 hours), followed by eight once-monthly meetings during the school year in school-based study groups (approximately 30 hours). Teachers focused on two science topics that they would teach in their own classrooms in the upcoming school year: “the earth’s changing surface” and “food webs” for fourth-grade teachers, and “matter and molecules in the water cycle” and “the sun’s effect on climate/seasons” for fifth-grade teachers. In the summer institute, teachers alternated half-day sessions on developing science content knowledge, led by postsecondary science faculty, with half-day sessions led by STeLLA® professional development staff in which they became familiar with STeLLA® lesson plans and teaching strategies and analyzed videorecordings of experienced teachers delivering model lesson plans. During the school year, teachers videorecorded themselves delivering lesson plans (program-provided or developed with their study group) and participated in monthly 3- to 4-hour school-based study group sessions facilitated by a STeLLA® professional development leader to analyze one another’s instruction.

Comparison Group

Teachers in the comparison group participated in a 1-year professional development program focused on developing science content knowledge in the same two topic areas as the intervention group: “the earth’s changing surface” and “food webs” for fourth-grade teachers and “matter and molecules in the water cycle” and “the sun’s effect on climate/seasons” for fifth-grade teachers. The program began with a 2-week summer institute (approximately 60 hours), followed by five 6-hour meetings during the school year (30 hours total). Postsecondary science faculty led both the summer institute and school-year sessions. In contrast to teachers in the intervention group, teachers in the comparison group did not receive training or support from STeLLA® professional development leaders. Teachers in the comparison group also did not receive STeLLA® lesson plans, learn about instructional strategies, nor participate in analysis of videorecorded science instruction.

Support for implementation

An external evaluator conducted an implementation study and gave similar ratings to the professional development provided to the intervention and comparison groups. The ratings were for the following indicators: effectiveness of the professional development provider, pacing of the sessions, teacher engagement, and collaboration among teachers. Observers rated the STeLLA® intervention group as spending more time on pedagogical issues and lesson analysis, and less time on science content, than the comparison group.

Additional Sources

In the case of multiple manuscripts that report on one study, the WWC selects one manuscript as the primary citation and lists other manuscripts that describe the study as additional sources.

Roth, Kathleen J.; Wilson, Christopher D.; Taylor, Joseph A.; Stuhlsatz, Molly A. M.; Hvidsten, Connie. (2019). Comparing the Effects of Analysis-of-Practice and Content-Based Professional Development on Teacher and Student Outcomes in Science. American Educational Research Journal, v56 n4 p1217-1253.

Grant Competition

Review Details

Reviewed: November 2017

At least one finding shows strong evidence of effectiveness

At least one statistically significant positive finding

Meets WWC standards without reservations

For:

Grant Competition (findings for Science Teachers Learning from Lesson Analysis (STeLLA))

Using:

Rating:

Meets WWC standards without reservations because it is a randomized controlled trial with low attrition.

Findings

Science Achievement outcomes—Statistically significant positive effect found for the domain
Outcome measure	Comparison	Period	Sample	Intervention mean	Comparison mean	Significant?	Improvement index	Evidence tier
Combined Achievement Test	Science Teachers Learning from Lesson Analysis (STeLLA) vs. Business as usual	1 Year	Full sample; 2,823 students	56.28	50.17	Yes	25

Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Sample Characteristics

Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.

12% English language learners
Female: 48%
Male: 52%
Rural, Suburban, Urban
- B
- A
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- I
- H
- J
- K
- L
- P
- M
- N
- O
- Q
- R
- S
- V
- U
- T
- W
- X
- Z
- Y
- a
- h
- i
- b
- d
- e
- f
- c
- g
- j
- k
- l
- m
- n
- o
- p
- q
- r
- s
- t
- u
- v
- x
- w
- y
Colorado

Race
Asian		2%
Black		4%
White		59%

Ethnicity
Hispanic		28%
Not Hispanic or Latino		72%

Study Details

Setting

The study took place in over 70 traditional elementary schools located in Colorado. All consenting fourth and fifth grade teachers in each school were included.

Study sample

School level demographics reported that intervention schools included 48% females, 12% ELL students, 44% free/reduced priced lunch status, 2% Asian, 5% Black, 28% Hispanic, and 59% White. 43% of the schools were considered urban, 40% suburban, and 17% rural. School level demographics reported that comparison schools included 48% females, 13% ELL students, 41% free/reduced priced lunch status, 3% Asian, 3% Black, 28% Hispanic, and 59% White. 63% of the schools were considered urban, 23% suburban, and 14% rural.

Intervention Group

STeLLA is a program for elementary teachers and it uses video-based analysis to support teachers' learning about science content and effective teaching. The program aims to improve teacher effectiveness and in turn increase student achievement. Teachers in the intervention group received specific PD that was focused on learning goals for teachers. The STeLLA program includes four types of knowledge and abilities that help focus these learning goals. Teachers are supported and increase their knowledge in science content in order to better instruct their students. Teaches also learn how to analyze their own teaching using a lesson analysis procedure they are taught. Teachers use video clips for this procedure. Teachers begin learning this process during a summer institute then continue to follow a protocol during the academic year. Teachers also participate in study groups during the year with other teachers. Teachers receive support from STeLLA leaders throughout the year, but are expected to gain more independence throughout the year.

Comparison Group

Teachers in the comparison group did not receive the STeLLA professional development. Instead these teachers participated in the Content Deepening Program, which is another science focused PD program. This program focuses on deepening science content knowledge for teachers in fourth and fifth grade. These teachers did not experience or participate in any analysis procedures during the year. Teachers did participate in a summer institute for this program and they also received support throughout the year.

Support for implementation

Teachers in the study participated in summer institute trainings and received support throughout the academic year.

The Effect of an Analysis-of-Practice, Videocase-Based, Teacher Professional Development Program on Elementary Students' Science Achievement

Science Teachers Learning from Lesson Analysis (STeLLA) Intervention Report - Science

Review Details

Findings

Sample Characteristics

Study Details

Setting

Study sample

Intervention Group

Comparison Group

Support for implementation

Additional Sources

Grant Competition

Review Details

Findings

Sample Characteristics

Study Details

Setting

Study sample

Intervention Group

Comparison Group

Support for implementation