At least one finding shows strong evidence of effectiveness
At least one statistically significant positive finding
Meets WWC standards without reservations
For:
-
Single Study Review (findings for Re-enrollment campaigns)
Rating:
-
Meets WWC standards without reservations
because it is a randomized controlled trial with low attrition.
This review may not reflect the full body of research evidence for this intervention.
Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.
College Enrollment outcomes—Statistically significant positive effect found for the domain
Outcome measure
|
Comparison
|
Period
|
Sample
|
Intervention mean
|
Comparison mean
|
Significant?
|
Improvement index
|
Evidence tier
|
College re-enrollment
|
Re-enrollment campaigns vs.
Business as usual
|
0 Days
|
Information + One-Course Waiver Group;
18,019 students
|
8.60
|
7.10
|
Yes
|
|
|
College re-enrollment
|
Re-enrollment campaigns vs.
Business as usual
|
0 Days
|
Full sample - Information Only - All Institutions;
18,019 students
|
7.60
|
7.10
|
No
|
--
|
|
College Re-enrollment: Full-Time
|
Re-enrollment campaigns vs.
Business as usual
|
0 Days
|
Information + One-Course Waiver Group;
18,019 students
|
2.80
|
2.30
|
--
|
--
|
|
College Re-enrollment: Part-Time
|
Re-enrollment campaigns vs.
Business as usual
|
0 Days
|
Information + One-Course Waiver Group;
18,019 students
|
6.40
|
5.50
|
--
|
--
|
|
Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.
Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.
-
13%
English language learners
-
Female: 59%
Male: 41%
-
- B
- A
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- I
- H
- J
- K
- L
- P
- M
- N
- O
- Q
- R
- S
- V
- U
- T
- W
- X
- Z
- Y
- a
- h
- i
- b
- d
- e
- f
- c
- g
- j
- k
- l
- m
- n
- o
- p
- q
- r
- s
- t
- u
- v
- x
- w
- y
Florida
-
Race
Black |
|
24% |
Other or unknown |
|
76% |
Setting
The authors of the study point out that students can experience financial and other social benefits after completing a degree, yet many students drop out of college even after making substantial progress toward completing school. College re-enrollment campaigns encourage students to re-enroll in and complete their degree. This study examined the effects of a text message-based campaign to nudge former students to re-enroll in community colleges. The study was conducted during the 2018-19 academic year with five community colleges in Florida. These colleges each enrolled about 64,000 students.
Study sample
Former students were eligible for the study if they: (1) accrued 30 credit hours; (2) established a grade point average (GPA) of 2.0 or better; (3) had no behavioral or financial holds preventing their re-enrollment; and (4) were previously enrolled in a degree-seeking program, but “stopped out” in the past three years. The study sample included 27,028 former students who were randomly assigned to (1) receive text-based nudges to re-enroll (Information-Only Group); (2) receive text-based nudges plus tuition waiver for one course (Information + One Course Waiver); or (3) a comparison group. The sample that informed the Information + One Course versus comparison sample had 18,019 students.
Approximately 42 percent of the sample was male; the average age was just over 31 years. About 24 percent of individuals in the control group were Black, 16 percent were Hispanic, 29 percent identified as multi-racial, and close to 13 percent reported having limited English skills. Participants’ average GPA was 2.8, and the average number of credits they accumulated was 45. Approximately 12 percent of study participants were previously enrolled full-time and 20 percent of the sample transferred to a community college from a different post-secondary institution. Finally, about 49 percent of individuals in the study received need-based aid. There were no statistically significant differences across the three groups at the beginning of the study, except the Information-Only Group had a slightly higher GPA (0.015 points) than the comparison group. This difference was accounted for in the statistical analysis.
Intervention Group
Former college students in Information-Only Group received 10 text messages meant to nudge them toward re-enrolling in college. Former students who replied to any of the texts received an automated reply directing them to their custom website to streamline the re-enrollment process, apply for financial aid, or contact an assigned advisor for assistance. Former students in the Information + One Course Waiver group received these same texts, but were also offered a one-course tuition waiver. This waiver offered the equivalent of 3 credit hours of in-state tuition at the college. Depending on the college, this waiver could be conditional in that it would be offered only if other financial aid did not cover course tuition, or unconditional, meaning that the credit was refundable even if all other tuition was covered by aid. Three colleges made the waiver conditional and two college made the waiver unconditional.
Comparison Group
Students in the comparison group received no text messages or course waivers, but they had access to the same opportunities for advising and financial aid assistance offered by the college as students in the intervention group.
Support for implementation
The study authors worked with a third-party vendor to ensure that all study participants had an active cell phone number. The study authors also used data from the National Student Clearinghouse to ensure that study participants had not already enrolled in or graduated from another college or university.