WWC review of this study

Can a Mixed-Method Literacy Intervention Improve the Reading Achievement of Low-Performing Elementary School Students in an After-School Program? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial of READ 180 Enterprise [READ 180 vs. business as usual]

Kim, James S.; Capotosto, Lauren; Hartry, Ardice; Fitzgerald, Robert (2011). Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, v33 n2 p183-201. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ927617

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
     examining 
    297
     Students
    , grades
    4-6

Reviewed: September 2021

At least one finding shows promising evidence of effectiveness
At least one statistically significant positive finding
Meets WWC standards without reservations
Passage reading fluency-oral outcomes—Indeterminate effect found for the domain
Outcome
measure
Comparison Period Sample Intervention
mean
Comparison
mean
Significant? Improvement
    index
Evidence
tier

The Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS): Oral Reading Fluency (DORF)

READ 180® vs. Business as usual

0 Days

Full sample;
297 students

106.42

103.73

No

--
Reading Comprehension outcomes—Statistically significant positive effect found for the domain
Outcome
measure
Comparison Period Sample Intervention
mean
Comparison
mean
Significant? Improvement
    index
Evidence
tier

Stanford Achievement Test 10th edition (SAT-10) - reading comprehension subtest

READ 180® vs. Business as usual

0 Days

Full sample;
296 students

635.92

625.75

Yes

 
 
13
 
Reading vocabulary outcomes—Statistically significant positive effect found for the domain
Outcome
measure
Comparison Period Sample Intervention
mean
Comparison
mean
Significant? Improvement
    index
Evidence
tier

Stanford Achievement Test Math (SAT-10): Reading Vocabulary subtest

READ 180® vs. Business as usual

0 Days

Full sample;
296 students

639.77

630.68

Yes

 
 
10
 


Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.


  • Female: 54%
    Male: 46%

  • Urban
    • B
    • A
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • I
    • H
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • P
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • V
    • U
    • T
    • W
    • X
    • Z
    • Y
    • a
    • h
    • i
    • b
    • d
    • e
    • f
    • c
    • g
    • j
    • k
    • l
    • m
    • n
    • o
    • p
    • q
    • r
    • s
    • t
    • u
    • x
    • w
    • y

    Massachusetts
  • Race
    Black
    54%
    Other or unknown
    18%
    White
    28%
  • Ethnicity
    Hispanic    
    12%
    Not Hispanic or Latino    
    88%

Setting

The study took place in a mid-sized urban school district in southeastern Massachusetts. Participating children attended four K-6 elementary schools in the district. Both intervention and comparison group students participated in after-school programming.

Study sample

The sample included students in grades 4 to 6, 95 percent of whom scored below proficiency on the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) in English language arts. At baseline, the sample was composed of 312 students, and of those, 54 percent were female and 46 percent male; 69 percent were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch; 54 percent were Black, 28 percent were White, 12 percent were Latinx, and 6 percent were classified as another race.

Intervention Group

The study examined the effectiveness of a reading intervention for students struggling with reading. The study tested the READ 180® Enterprise intervention. Students in the intervention condition received the READ 180® structured reading program in an afterschool setting. Although the READ 180® program was implemented in an afterschool setting, the key program components were implemented, including the structuring of time to include whole-class instruction, as well as three rotations focused on (1) time using READ 180® software, (2) modeled and independent reading, and (3) small-group direct instruction. Because of the 60-minute session length (compared to the standard READ 180® 90-minute session length), the program developer devised a schedule in which, on any given day, students would rotate through two rather than three of the small-group centers. Student workbooks (“rBooks®”) were also provided in keeping with the program design, and the intended class size of 15 or fewer students was generally maintained. In year 1, READ 180® students received the program 4 days per week in 60-minute sessions for 23 weeks. In year 2, three of the four study schools changed the schedule so that the program was implemented for only 2 days per week in 90-minute sessions. The fourth school provided the program 4 days per week and in 90-minute sessions in year 2.

Comparison Group

Students in the comparison condition attended Brockton Public Schools’ standard after-school program, which generally includes 40 minutes of homework, 1 hour of another structured learning activity such as math or reading, and the remainder of the time in physical exercise or recreation. Instructors could choose from 16 structured learning activities, including math games, reading, art projects, or science activities, or they could develop their own activities. In year 1, comparison group students attended the regular afterschool program for 4 days each week. In year 2, three of the four schools switched to a 2-day-per-week schedule for the regular afterschool program, while the fourth school retained the 4-day-per-week schedule.

Support for implementation

Scholastic, Inc., the publisher of READ 180®, provided professional development services to participating teachers. These services consisted of a full day of training prior to the launch of the READ 180® intervention, as well as a half-day of training after approximately 6 weeks of implementation. During the implementation period, a Scholastic trainer periodically met with all of the teachers implementing READ 180® to discuss challenges and identify solutions. All teachers also had access to an online professional development program, called RED, provided by Scholastic.

 

Your export should download shortly as a zip archive.

This download will include data files for study and findings review data and a data dictionary.

Connect With the WWC

loading
back to top