Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on IES-Funded Research arrow_forward_ios Building Language for Literacy and ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Building Language for Literacy and ...
Information on IES-Funded Research
Grant Closed

Building Language for Literacy and Core Knowledge

NCER
Program: Education Research Grants
Program topic(s): Early Learning Programs and Policies
Award amount: $1,964,376
Principal investigator: Sharon Ramey
Awardee:
Georgetown University
Year: 2003
Project type:
Efficacy
Award number: R305J030120

Purpose

In this project, the researchers proposed to evaluate the efficacy of two widely used prekindergarten-Building Language for Literacy and Core Knowledge-against business-as-usual. Through their evaluation, the researchers aimed to produce findings about the curricula and the different levels of implementation necessary for student learning. They were also to provide data about how well specific kinds of students learn in the various conditions.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Elizabeth Albro

Elizabeth Albro

Commissioner of Education Research
NCER

Products and publications

ERIC Citations: Find available citations in ERIC for this award here.

Select Publications:

Book chapters

Ramey, C.T., Ramey, S.L., and Stokes, B.R. (2009). Effective Pre-K Programs: Research Evidence About Program Dosage and Student Achievement. In R. Pianta (Ed.), Pre-Kindergarten in the United States (pp. 79-105). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Ramey, S.L., and Ramey, C.T. (2007). Establishing a Science of Professional Development for Early Education Programs: The Knowledge Application Information Systems (KAIS) Theory of Professional Development. In L.M. Justice, and C. Vukelich (Eds.), Achieving Excellence in Preschool Language and Literacy instruction (pp. 41-63). New York: Guilford Press.

Ramey, S.L., Ramey, C.T., and Lanzi, R.G. (2004). The Transition to School: Building on Preschool Foundations and Preparing for Lifelong Learning. In E. Zigler, and S.J. Styfco (Eds.), The Head Start Debates (pp. 397-413). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes

Supplemental information

Using a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, the investigators are comparing three curricula: Building Language for Literacy, Core Knowledge, and the curricular approach already in place as a comparison condition. Half of the teachers using each curriculum receive intensive support for implementing the curriculum, and half receive the support normally provided by the district. The intensive support includes expert-led professional development, weekly classroom observation and instructional coaching. The traditional support involves periodic help and summer workshops.

The students in the study come from low-income families with various ethnic and language backgrounds in Maryland. The research team randomly assigned schools to one of the curricula and levels of support.

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

Policies and StandardsTeachingReading

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Zoomed in IES logo
Evaluation Report

2024 National Board for Education Sciences Annual ...

Author(s): Carol D. Lee, Matthew Soldner
Publication number: NBES 2025-001
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
News

REL Central provides evidence about the mentoring ...

June 24, 2025 by
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Data file

U.S. Program for the International Assessment of A...

Publication number: NCES 2025224
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote