Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on IES-Funded Research arrow_forward_ios Building Students' Understanding of ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Building Students' Understanding of ...
Information on IES-Funded Research
Grant Closed

Building Students' Understanding of Energy in High School Biology

NCER
Program: Education Research Grants
Program topic(s): Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education
Award amount: $1,492,355
Principal investigator: Jo Ellen Roseman
Awardee:
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Year: 2015
Project type:
Development and Innovation
Award number: R305A150310

Purpose

The purpose of this development project was to design and test a replacement unit for high school biology that focused on energy in physical and biological systems. Ideas about energy changes and conservation are fundamental to understanding physical and life science and are prominent in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Energy concepts, however, can be challenging for students as they are abstract and often counterintuitive, especially when they occur in the context of biological systems where links between inputs and outputs are hidden.

Project Activities

Developers of the Matter and Energy for Growth and Activity (MEGA) unit used an iterative curriculum design process in which successive drafts of the unit were tried out in classrooms and revised based on student performance data, teacher feedback, and expert review. Curriculum activities that engage students in modeling and explaining phenomena related to animal and plant growth and activity were (a) designed and tested with biology students in a suburban classroom and with urban students in an after school enrichment program, (b) revised and organized into a coherent unit that was tested in a suburban classroom, (c) revised again and tested in a small RCT study, and then (d) revised again and field tested. While the original plan was to develop and test a 6-week unit focused on helping high school biology students explain energy changes in physical and biological systems in terms of bond breaking and bond forming during chemical reactions, it became apparent during classroom testing that few students held a mental model of atom rearrangement and conservation needed to make sense of matter changes in physical and biological systems. Because matter ideas and modeling practices were essential prerequisites to the planned energy unit, lessons were added to attempt to address student deficiencies.

Structured Abstract

Setting

Studies were carried out in classrooms of teachers from suburban high schools in Maryland and New Jersey and in an after-school enrichment program in Washington, DC.

Sample

Initial development and testing occurred in two suburban classrooms, co-taught by the classroom teachers and researchers, and in an after-school enrichment program taught by researchers. The RCT study involved fifteen teachers and 735 students enrolled in a basic biology course in two schools. The field test involved eleven teachers and 664 students enrolled in a basic biology course in four schools and 420 biology students from a large public university in the northeast US. Based on student self-reports, the field-test high school students were about 58% male and 42% female, and approximately 21% of the students were white, 11% were Asian, 25% were African American, 11% were Hispanic, and 14% were of two or more ethnicities. The university students were about 39% male and 61% female and approximately 32% of the students were white, 44% were Asian, 5% were African American, 9% were Hispanic and 5% selected other.
Intervention
The 12-week intervention, Matter and Energy for Growth and Activity, includes a student edition, a companion teacher edition, companion online resources that include videos and print materials for classroom activities, and materials for face-to-face teacher professional development activities.

Research design and methods

In Years 1and 2, the development process included small-scale studies designed to assess the usability of the unit's activities. Based on observations and feedback from the studies, researchers revised the unit activities. A Year 3 classroom feasibility study tested the first full iteration of the unit with fifteen teachers. Researchers focused on teachers' ability to implement the unit, the level of student engagement in classroom activities, and student learning outcomes. After further revising the unit, a Year 4 field study tested student learning outcomes.

Control condition

The control condition for the RCT study was students receiving business- as-usual instruction in high school biology. The comparison condition for the field test was students enrolled in a university biology course.

Key measures

Key student outcome measures included a researcher-developed assessment of student learning of matter and energy concepts and science practices in physical and biological systems. A total of 64 multiple-choice items and six constructed-response items were developed. These items were used to build three versions of the test with each version consisting of 33–35 items that were a mix of multiple-choice and constructed-response items. Seven items appeared on all three versions so that comparisons could be made across forms.

Data analytic strategy

Surveys, interviews, and observational data collected as part of the iterative development process was analyzed using qualitative methods and used to inform curriculum revisions. Data from the RCT study was analyzed using Rasch analysis and a two- level hierarchical linear model with students nested within teachers.

Key outcomes

The main findings of this project are as follows.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Christina Chhin

Education Research Analyst
NCER

Products and publications

Products:

Project website: https://www.nsta.org/blog/matter-and-energy-growth-and-activity

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)/Project 2061. (2020). Matter and energy for growth and activity: Teacher edition. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)/Project 2061. (2020). Matter and energy for growth and activity: Student edition. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)/Project 2061. (2020). Matter and energy for growth and activity: Online resources. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press. https://www.nsta.org/publications/press/extras/growthandactivity.aspx
  • Roseman, J. E., Koppal, M., Herrmann-Abell, C. F., Pappalardo, S., & Schiff, E. (in press). Photosynthesis: Matter and energy for plant growth. In J. Nordine & O. Lee (Eds.) Crosscutting concepts: Strengthening science teaching. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)/Project 2061. (2020). MEGA Assessment Items: http://assessment.aaas.org/topics/5

Publications:

Herrmann-Abell, C. F., Hardcastle, J., & Roseman, J. E. (2019). Evaluating a Unit Aimed at Helping Students Understand Matter and Energy for Growth and Activity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (Toronto, Canada, Apr 5-9, 2019)

Project website:

https://www.nsta.org/blog/matter-and-energy-growth-and-activity

Supplemental information

Co-Principal Investigator: Stark, Louisa

Project researchers developed and tested a new approach for helping students build connections between macroscopic and molecular energy concepts in the physical and life sciences, while integrating learning across disciplinary core ideas, scientific practices, and crosscutting concepts.

Developers also designed a set of multiple-choice and constructed response items to measure students' understanding of the unit's learning goals. The items were used in pre-and post-tests in (a) a randomized control trial (RCT) that compared the performance of students who used the MEGA unit with that of students' who used their district curriculum and in (b) a field test of the further revised unit that compared the performance of students who had completed the unit to the performance of university biology students.

  • The team found that it is possible to design a coherent unit that both targets appropriate NGSS physical and life science core ideas about matter and energy, crosscutting concepts of energy and matter and systems and system models, and science practices of data analysis, modeling and explanation and engages students in making sense of interesting macroscopic phenomena related to the growth and activity of living organisms in terms of underlying molecular mechanisms.
  • Students using the MEGA unit in the RCT study outperformed students who used the school district curriculum (Herrmann-Abell et al., 2019).

Student materials consist of 14 lessons that target the following NGSS Performance Expectations:

  • Plan and conduct an investigation to provide evidence that feedback mechanisms maintain homeostasis. (HS-LS1-3)
  • Develop and use a model to illustrate the hierarchical organization of interacting systems provide specific functions within multicellular organisms. (HS-LS1-2)
  • Construct and revise an explanation based on evidence for how carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen from sugar molecules (glucose) may combine with other elements to form amino acids and/or other large carbon-based molecules (growth). (HS-LS1-6)
  • Use a model to illustrate how photosynthesis transforms light energy into stored chemical energy. (HS-LS1-5)
  • Use a model to illustrate that cellular respiration is a chemical process whereby the bonds of food molecules and oxygen molecules are broken and the bonds in new compounds are formed resulting in a net transfer of energy. (HS-LS1-7)
  • Develop a model to illustrate that the release or absorption of energy from a chemical reaction system depends upon the changes in total bond energy. (HS-PS1-4)

Carefully sequenced questions throughout the unit's activities guide students in (a) observing phenomena and data involving changes in matter and energy, (b) using models to make sense of matter changes during chemical in terms of atom rearrangement and conservation, energy changes during chemical reactions in terms of bond breaking and bond forming, and energy transfer in terms of coupling energy requiring to energy releasing systems, (c) connecting observations of phenomena and models to science ideas, and (d) explaining related phenomena using evidence, science ideas, and models.

The teacher materials provide information about the purpose and intent of the unit and of each lesson and activity, including information on the core ideas and practices that are targeted and the instructional strategies that are embedded in each lesson. In addition, the teacher materials identify common student learning difficulties and provide examples of correct responses to all questions and tasks students are expected to complete.

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

Science

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Zoomed in IES logo
First Look / ED TAB

TIMSS 2023 U.S. Highlights Web Report

Author(s): Catharine Warner-Griffin, Grace Handley, Benjamin Dalton, Debbie Herget
Publication number: NCES 2024184
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Grant

Center for Advancing Elementary Science through As...

Award number: R305C240014
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Grant

National Center on Generative AI for Uplifting STE...

Award number: R305C240010
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote