Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on IES-Funded Research arrow_forward_ios Center for Data-Driven Reform in Ed ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Center for Data-Driven Reform in Ed ...
Information on IES-Funded Research
Grant Closed

Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education

NCER
Program: Education Research and Development Centers
Program topic(s): Improving Low Achieving Schools
Award amount: $9,997,674
Principal investigator: Robert Slavin
Awardee:
Johns Hopkins University
Year: 2004
Award period: 4 years (07/01/2004 - 06/30/2008)
Project type:
Efficacy
Award number: R305A040082

Purpose

The purpose of the Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education (CDDRE) was to study how school districts can use data-driven reform to improve student achievement. This question was examined through randomized controlled trials at the district level. In response to the need for success on measured objectives under No Child Left Behind, CDDRE provided the following services to state, district, and school leadership teams through its Raising the Bar program:

  • Training in and coaching on using a data-driven decision-making process for planning and achievement.
  • Information on research-proven solutions to student-achievement challenges.
  • Training in and coaching on instructional leadership and achievement monitoring.

Project Activities

Focused program of research

CDDRE conducted research with 59 school districts located in Alabama, Arizona, Indiana, Ohio, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Pennsylvania. These districts were randomly assigned to immediate or delayed treatment groups. Once districts began receiving services from CDDRE, the districts and their schools received support in data analysis and achievement planning, selecting research-proven solutions, and monitoring achievement and instructional leadership.

Under No Child Left Behind, thousands of schools are failing to meet adequate yearly progress standards. The number of schools in difficulty outpaced the capacity of state and district leaders to address them. State and district leaders needed replicable strategies to help them ensure success on measured objectives. In response to this need, the Center aimed to develop and rigorously evaluate state, district, and school-level strategies to enhance student achievement and help schools meet their performance goals.

The research questions answered include:

  • Do districts that use the CDDRE model of data analysis and instructional review significantly improve student achievement?
  • Do districts that use the CDDRE model of data analysis and instructional review, and implement a research-proven solution, significantly improve student achievement?

National leadership and outreach activities

CDDRE produced the Best Evidence Encyclopedia (https://bestevidence.org/) to provide practitioners with reviews of data-proven solutions that cover elementary and secondary math and reading.

Key outcomes

CDDRE successfully designed and implemented a large cluster randomized efficacy trial intended to examine the impact of a composite data-driven intervention. Fifty-nine districts in seven states were randomly assigned to start CDDRE services either immediately or one year later. CDDRE also used a matched evaluation where individual schools in each participating district were matched with control schools that had never experienced CDDRE processes. The randomized study found positive effects on reading and math in fifth and eighth grade by Year 4. In the matched evaluation, significant positive effects were seen on reading scores for fifth and eighth graders in Years 3 and 4. Effects were much larger for schools that selected data-proven actions than for those that selected other programs. The Center also found that the schools that took data-driven action to change teaching and learning produced more gains in student achievement than schools that only provided leaders with data. Additionally, CDDRE found that engaging schools in self-examination techniques, benchmark assessment tools, and information on proven alternatives is an effective way to have schools adopt proven reading programs.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

James Benson

Project contributors

GwenCarol Holmes

Co-principal investigator

Products and publications

Publications:

Book

Slavin, R., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, C., and Davis, S. (2009). Effective Beginning Reading Programs: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Baltimore: Center for Research and Reform in Education, Johns Hopkins University.

Slavin, R., Lake, C., Cheung, A., and Davis, S. (2008). Beyond the Basics: Effective Reading Programs for the Upper Elementary Grades. Baltimore: Center for Research and Reform in Education, Johns Hopkins University.

Book chapter

Chambers, B., Cheung, A., and Slavin, R. (2006). A Review of Research on Alternative Early Childhood Program. In B. Spodek, and O. Saracho (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Education of Young Children (pp. 347-360). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Chambers, B., Cheung, A., and Slavin, R.E. (2006). Effective Preschool Programs for Children at Risk of School Failure: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. In B. Spodek (Ed.), Handbook of Research on the Education of Young Children (pp. 347-360). New York: Erlbaum.

Chambers, B., de Botton, O., Cheung, A., and Slavin, R.E. (2012). Effective Early Childhood Programs for Children at Risk of School Failure. In O.N. Saracho, and B. Spodek (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Education of Young Children (3rd ed., pp. 322-331). New York: Routledge.

Slavin R.E. (2008). Comprehensive School Reform. In C. Ames, D. Berliner, J. Brophy, L. Corno, and M. McCaslin (Eds.), 21st Century Education: A Reference Handbook (pp. 259-266). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Slavin, R.E. (2009). Systematic Reviews of Research on Educational Programs: Methodological and Substantive Issues. In R. St. Clair (Ed.), Education Science: Critical Perspectives (pp. 53-70). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

Slavin, R.E. (2010). Innovations and Early Intervention in the Teaching of Literacy. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, and B. McGaw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 221-226). Oxford: Elsevier.

Slavin, R. (2013). Cooperative Learning and Achievement: Theory and Research. In W. Reynolds, G. Miller, and I. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 199-212). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Slavin, R.E., and Madden, N.A. (2010). Success for All: Prevention and Early Intervention in School-Wide Reform. In J. Meece, and J. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Schools, Schooling, and Human Development (pp. 434-445). New York: Routledge.

Slavin, R.E., Madden, N.A., and Chambers, B. (2008). Success for All, Embedded Multimedia, and the Teaching-Learning Orchestra. In S. Neuman (Ed.), Pathways to Literacy Achievement for High Poverty Children: Ready to Learn (pp. 243-259). Baltimore: Paul Brookes.

Journal article, monograph, or newsletter

Chambers, B., Abrami, P.C., Slavin, R.E., and Madden, N.A. (2011). A Three-Tier Model of Reading Instruction Supported by Technology. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 9 (3): 286-297.

Chambers, B., Abrami, P.C., Tucker, B.J., Slavin, R.E., Madden, N.A., Cheung, A., and Gifford, R. (2008). Computer-Assisted Tutoring in Success for All: Reading Outcomes for First Graders. Journal of Research on Effective Education, 1 (2): 120-137.

Chambers, B., Slavin, R.E., Madden, N.A., Abrami, P.C., Karanzalis, M., and Gifford, R. (2011). Small-Group, Computer-Assisted Tutoring to Improve Reading Outcomes for Struggling First and Second Graders. Elementary School Journal, 111 (4): 625-640.

Cheung, A., and Slavin, R. (2005). Effective Reading Programs for English Language Learners and Other Language Minority Students. Bilingual Research Journal, 29 (2): 241-267.

Cheung, A., and Slavin, R.E. (2012). Effective Reading Programs for Spanish-Dominant English Language Learners (ELLs) in the Elementary Grades: A Synthesis of Research. Review of Educational Research, 82 (4): 351-395.

Cheung, A., and Slavin, R.E. (2012). How Features of Educational Technology Applications Affect Student Reading Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Research Review, 7 (3): 198-215.

Cheung, A., and Slavin, R.E. (2013). Effects of Educational Technology Applications on Reading Outcomes for Struggling Readers: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 48 (3): 277-299.

Cheung, A., and Slavin, R.E. (2013). The Effectiveness of Educational Technology Applications for Enhancing Mathematics Achievement in K‐12 Classrooms: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Research Review, 9 : 88-113.

Madden, N.A., Slavin, R.E., Logan, M., and Cheung, A. (2011). Effects of Cooperative Writing With Embedded Multimedia: A Randomized Experiment. Effective Education, 3 (1): 1-9.

Slavin, R. (2005). Evidence-Based Reform in Education: Promise and Pitfalls. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 18 (1): 8-13.

Slavin, R. (2006). Research and Effectiveness: A ‘10 Percent Solution' That Can Make Evidence-Based Reform a Reality. Education Week, 26 (8): 31, 40.

Slavin, R. (2008). Evidence-Based Reform in Education: Which Evidence Matters?. Educational Researcher, 37 (1): 47-50.

Slavin, R., and Cheung, A. (2005). A Synthesis of Research on Language of Reading Instruction for English Language Learners. Review of Educational Research, 75 (2): 247-284.

Slavin, R., and Lake, C. (2008). Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics; A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78 (3): 427-515.

Slavin, R., Chamberlain, A., and Daniels, C. (2007). Preventing Reading Failure. Educational Leadership, 65 (2): 22-27.

Slavin, R., Cheung, A., Groff, C., and Lake, C. (2008). Effective Reading Programs for Middle and High Schools: A Best Evidence Synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43 (3): 290-322.

Slavin, R., Lake, C., and Groff, C. (2009). Effective Programs in Middle and High School Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79 (2): 839-911.

Slavin, R.E. (2008). Evidence-Based Reform in Education: What will it Take?. European Educational Research Journal, 7 (1): 124-128.

Slavin, R.E. (2008). What Works? Issues in Synthesizing Educational Program Evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37 (1): 5-14.

Slavin, R.E. (2011). Job One for Title I: Use What Works. Education Week, 30 (26): 24-25.

Slavin, R.E. (2013). Effective Programmes in Reading and Mathematics: Lessons From the Best Evidence Encyclopaedia. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24 (4): 383-391.

Slavin, R.E. (2013). Overcoming Four Barriers to Evidence-Based Education. Education Week, 32 (30): 1.

Slavin, R.E., and Madden, N.A. (2011). Measures Inherent to Treatments in Program Effectiveness Reviews. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4 (4): 370-380.

Slavin, R.E., and Smith, D. (2009). The Relationship Between Sample Sizes and Effect Sizes in Systematic Reviews in Education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31 (4): 500-506.

Slavin, R.E., Chamberlain, A., Daniels, C., and Madden, N.A. (2009). The Reading Edge: A Randomized Evaluation of a Middle School Cooperative Reading Program. Effective Education, 1 (1): 13-26.

Slavin, R.E., Holmes, G., Madden, N.A., Chamberlain, A., and Cheung, A. (2012). Effects of a Data-Driven District Reform Model on State Assessment Outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 50 (2): 371-396.

Slavin, R.E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., and Davis, S. (2009). Effective Reading Programs for the Elementary Grades: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79 (4): 1391-1465.

Slavin, R.E., Lake, C., Davis, S., and Madden, N. (2011). Effective Programs for Struggling Readers: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Educational Research Review, 6 (1): 1-26.

Slavin, R.E., Madden, N.A., Calderón, M.E., Chamberlain, A., and Hennessy, M. (2011). Reading and Language Outcomes of a Multiyear Randomized Evaluation of Transitional Bilingual Education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33 (1): 47-58.

Nongovernment report, issue brief, or practice guide

Slavin, R.E., Lake, C., Hanley, P., and Thurston, A. (2012). Effective Programs for Elementary Science: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

Supplemental information

Key Personnel: GwenCarol Holmes

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

K-12 EducationMathematicsPolicies and StandardsReading

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Zoomed in IES logo
Evaluation Report

2024 National Board for Education Sciences Annual ...

Author(s): Carol D. Lee, Matthew Soldner
Publication number: NBES 2025-001
Read More
Zoomed in Yellow IES Logo
Grant

Longitudinal Relations Among Social Contexts, Bull...

Award number: R305A230406
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Descriptive Study

Examining the Mentoring Experiences of First-Year ...

Author(s): Marc Brodersen, Hanley Chiang, Gary Ritter, Jane Li, Jennifer Weston-Sementelli, Collin Hitt
Publication number: REL 2025-014
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote