Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on ... arrow_forward_ios From Cognitive ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios From Cognitive ...
Information on ...
Grant Closed

From Cognitive Models of Reasoning to Lesson Plans for Inquiry

NCER
Program: Education Research Grants
Program topic(s): Cognition and Student Learning
Award amount: $754,206
Principal investigator: David Klahr
Awardee:
Carnegie Mellon University
Year: 2003
Award period: 4 years (08/01/2003 - 07/31/2007)
Project type:
Development and Innovation
Award number: R305H030229

Purpose

In this project, researchers intended to develop, implement, and assess cognitively grounded lesson planning methods to improve science achievement of middle-school students.

Project Activities

The researchers carried out a three-phase design experiment in grade 5 through 8 classrooms in 4 urban schools serving a predominantly African-American population of students, most of whom come from low income families. 

In the first phase, the researchers studied how science education was delivered by examining existing state science standards, science curricula, teaching practices, and high-stakes tests and seeing how they relate to one another. The researchers used content and task analyses of educational materials, ethnographic field observations of science classes, and videotaped lesson analyses. 

In the second phase, they carried out a researcher-teacher design study, in which they developed lesson-planning methods and used those methods to guide their teaching of science in regular classrooms, evaluating the potential efficacy and feasibility of the approach. 

In the third phase, they used a professional development process to help regular teachers learn to apply the new lesson planning methods, with the goal of implementing sustainable changes in the teachers' teaching practices and impacting students' science achievement. The researchers measured changes in participating teachers' instructional practices and their students' academic achievement in science.

Key outcomes

During the first year of the project, the team described current classroom practice in 5th-8th grade science classes, three different national and state science standards for this age group, and items included on 5th and 8th grade standardized science achievement tests. This detailed discussion of the alignment, or lack thereof, between current instruction and curriculum, standards, and standardized tests provided the research team with an in-depth understanding of what currently happens in science classrooms. This knowledge then was used to demonstrate to the teachers and administrators the need for a coordinated, consistent, and coherent lesson planning process. 

In Year 1, the team also completed two researcher-teaching experiments within two classrooms where students were taught the Control of Variables Strategy using previous methodology that had been demonstrated to be effective in the laboratory. The classroom version of the instruction also proved successful. 

In Year 2, the team carried out the researcher-teacher experiment over 20 weeks in three separate 6th grade classrooms across three different schools, using novel lesson plans. Overall the experiment was highly successful, but during this year that the team confronted the pragmatic constraints placed on teachers in terms of the amount of topics and information that they are expected to instruct in depth. Time constraints make attaining all of the goals extremely difficult, and so the team, in conjunction with the teachers, made decisions about which topics to address in depth, and which to address more superficially. This information was critically important to the team’s development of a feasible lesson planning method.

In Year 3, the project moved into 7th grade classrooms, and lesson plans revised with the knowledge were implemented in 4 schools. The lesson plans were co-developed with teachers this year and they created a set of prototype lesson planning tools that other teachers can use. Three of the four schools were successful at increasing the participation of students in science fairs, and many of the students did quite well. In the one school where the researcher was still heavily involved improvement in standardized achievement scores was found. 

The final year of the project was spent working with the teachers and transferring the responsibility for the lesson plans from a researcher-led team to a teacher-led team. Building on lesson plans constructed in prior years, the teachers worked together to meet the goal for the year: to continue to use and adapt the methods from previous years to reduce the topics taught and increase the depth to which topics are taught, and to concentrate efforts on engaging students in meaningful projects that they would eventually present at science fairs. These goals were met, and student success at the local and regional science fairs far exceeded expectations.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Elizabeth Albro

Elizabeth Albro

Commissioner of Education Research
NCER

Products and publications

Publications:

ERIC Citations: Find available citations in ERIC for this award here.

Select Publications:

Book chapters

Li, J., and Klahr, D. (2006). The Psychology of Scientific Thinking: Implications for Science Teaching and Learning. In J. Rhoton, and P. Shane (Eds.), Teaching Science in the 21st Century (pp. 307-351). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.

Journal articles

Klahr, D., and Li, J. (2005). Cognitive Research and Elementary Science Instruction: From the Laboratory, to the Classroom, and Back. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(2): 217-238.

Li, J., Klahr, D., and Siler, S. (2006). What Lies Beneath the Science Achievement Gap: The Challenges of Aligning Science Instruction With Standards and Tests. Science Educator, 15(1): 1-12.

Related projects

Training in Experimental Design: Developing Scalable and Adaptive Computer-based Science Instruction

R305H060034

Promoting Transfer of the Control of Variables Strategy in Elementary and Middle School Children via Contextual Framing and Abstraction

R305A100404

Contextualizing Experimental Design Instruction Within Related Inquiry Activities: The ISP Tutor

R305A170176

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

Academic AchievementCognitionK-12 EducationScienceStudents

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Blue zoomed in IES logo
Other

Strengthening School Supports for Kinship Caregive...

February 26, 2026
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
News

Updated Study Review Protocol and new study review...

February 05, 2026 by
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Research insights

From Evidence to Classroom Practice: The Toolkit t...

February 02, 2026 by Riley Stone
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote