Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on ... arrow_forward_ios Content-Rich Vo ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Content-Rich Vo ...
Information on ...
Grant Closed

Content-Rich Vocabulary Development to Improve Reading Achievement of Struggling Adolescent Readers

NCER
Program: Education Research Grants
Program topic(s): Literacy
Award amount: $1,999,939
Principal investigator: Claude Goldenberg
Awardee:
Stanford University
Year: 2007
Award period: 5 years (08/01/2008 - 07/31/2013)
Project type:
Development and Innovation
Award number: R305B070016

Purpose

In this project, the researchers proposed to develop a content-rich vocabulary program for adolescent struggling in reading. The premise of this project was that limited vocabulary, and the limited background knowledge that accompanies it, severely limits the reading comprehension of struggling adolescent readers. Clearly, other issues can contribute to poor adolescent reading, such as inadequate reading fluency or lack of skill in using reading strategies. However, there is growing evidence that limited vocabulary and inadequate background knowledge create significant obstacles for many students. The researchers developed a vocabulary intervention to address this issue and obtained pilot data on the association between exposure to their intervention and subsequent vocabulary and reading comprehension gains.

Project Activities

The researchers conducted the project in urban school districts with substantial numbers of struggling adolescent readers. Project participants were to be seventh- and eighth-grade students with adequate decoding skills but poor reading comprehension, with a substantial number of participants being English-language learners and/or from low socioeconomic status (SES) and minority backgrounds. In the development phase, the researchers worked with middle-school English and history teachers to develop the Content-Rich Vocabulary program and to conduct observational studies in classrooms and elicit teacher feedback to develop and refine the program. In the field test phase, the researchers conducted a randomized study with eight schools assigned either to experimental or control conditions to establish whether there is plausible evidence of the program's effect on vocabulary and reading comprehension when compared to current instructional practice. Outcome measures included curriculum-specific vocabulary and reading comprehension measures, as well as general measures of reading vocabulary and comprehension, including the Gates-MacGinitie test of reading. Field test data were analyzed using hierarchical models. Teacher feedback on program design features and implementation data were analyzed using simple descriptive methods.

Structured Abstract

Sample

During the curriculum development phase of the study, the research team will work with 12 middle school English and history teachers. Project participants during the field test will be seventh- and eighth-grade students with adequate decoding skills but poor comprehension. A substantial number of participants will be English-language learners. Many of the students will be from low socioeconomic and minority backgrounds.

Intervention

The intervention will include the following features:

  • a student instructional program, accompanied by teacher materials to support implementation that targets Content-Rich Vocabulary needed by struggling adolescent
  • a focus on teaching two types of individual words: high-frequency words used by mature readers that carry information across domains (e.g., exposure, variation) and domain-specific words highly pertinent to history/social studies
  • a focus on word-learning strategies such as the meanings of high-utility prefixes, suffixes, and roots, and using contextual clues within sentences, including appositive forms, and synonym, definition, and antonym clues
  • documentation of wide reading to extend word use through a log system
  • documentation of word awareness beyond the classroom through a Vocabulary Notebook
  • curriculum modules designed to fit into either a regular 40-minute English class or as a separate 20- or 40-minute additional period, depending upon the results of the observational studies

This intervention will support rather than replace a core language arts curriculum. It is intended to supplement the English language arts program.

Research design and methods

The researchers will conduct observational studies and elicit teacher feedback to develop and refine the program. In the field test phase, the researchers will use a randomized study with eight schools (at least three classrooms per school) assigned either to experimental or control conditions to establish whether there is plausible evidence of the program's effect on vocabulary and reading comprehension when compared to a current instructional practice.

Control condition

Participants in the control condition will receive their regular classroom instruction.

Key measures

Outcome measures will include curriculum-specific vocabulary and reading comprehension measures, as well as generalized measures of reading vocabulary and comprehension, including the Gates-MacGinitie test of reading.

Data analytic strategy

Field test data will be analyzed using hierarchical models. Teacher feedback on program design features and implementation data will be analyzed using simple descriptive methods.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Elizabeth Albro

Elizabeth Albro

Commissioner of Education Research
NCER

Products and publications

ERIC Citations: Find available citations in ERIC for this award here and here.

Project Website: Word Intelligence&tm;: Developing Academic and Content Vocabulary

Additional Online Resources and information: ** This project was submitted to and funded under Interventions for Struggling Adolescent and Adult Readers and Writers in FY 2007.

Project website:

https://www.wordintelligence.net/

Additional project information

Previous award details:

Previous award number:
R305B070688
Previous awardee:
California State University, Long Beach

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

English Learners (EL)Policies and Standards

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Zoomed in IES logo
Tool/Toolkit

Supporting Classroom Teachers with Implementing th...

Author(s): Heidi Goertzen
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Fact Sheet/Infographic/FAQ

Dual Enrollment, Concurrent Enrollment, and Early ...

Author(s): U.S. Department of Education
Read More
Rectangle Blue 1 Pattern 1
Blog

Helping Educators Address Chronic Absence Through ...

October 27, 2025 by Rebecca Lindgren
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote