Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on IES-Funded Research arrow_forward_ios Does Federal Work-Study Work for St ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Does Federal Work-Study Work for St ...
Information on IES-Funded Research
Grant Open

Does Federal Work-Study Work for Students? Evidence From a Randomized Controlled Trial

NCER
Program: Education Research Grants
Program topic(s): Postsecondary and Adult Education
Award amount: $2,782,727
Principal investigator: Judith Scott-Clayton
Awardee:
Teachers College, Columbia University
Year: 2020
Award period: 4 years 6 months (09/01/2020 - 03/07/2025)
Project type:
Efficacy
Award number: R305A200250

Purpose

The purpose of this project is to evaluate the impact of receiving a federal work-study (FWS) offer on outcomes for low-income undergraduate aid applicants at a large, urban public college system. The FWS program is one of the oldest federal policy tools intended to promote college access and persistence for low-income students. The program serves approximately 1 in 10 college students at a cost of nearly $1 billion annually, yet it has never been rigorously evaluated.

Project Activities

Researchers will use a randomized control trial (RCT) to examine the impact of receiving an FWS offer on low-income undergraduate aid applicants. They will also carry out an in-depth implementation and cost study, drawing upon administrator interviews, student focus groups, and a student survey, in addition to administrative data on the nature and quality of FWS jobs on campus.

Structured Abstract

Setting

The setting for this study is a large, urban public college system in the northeast comprised of 18 undergraduate campuses, including community colleges (7) and 4-year colleges (11).

Sample

Researchers will identify low-income aid applicants and will create a sample of at least of 7,200 students across the study. Researchers will engage 6 campuses for the in-depth implementation and cost studies.

Intervention

The FWS program as implemented in this urban system includes up to $4,000 in financial support to students as compensation for on-campus employment.

Research design and methods

Researchers will evaluate the FWS program using an RCT. The study's timeframe will allow the research team to gather data up to 5 years after the initial cohort is randomized, with all cohorts followed for at least 3 years. Using primarily administrative data, researchers will estimate both the intent-to-treat (ITT) effect of receiving an FWS offer and the treatment-on-the-treated (TOT) effect of FWS participation on both confirmatory and exploratory outcomes. They will also conduct qualitative fieldwork, including administrator interviews and student focus groups, at six campuses in the first part of the study for an implementation study and cost analysis to better understand how the operation of FWS varies at the campus level and how students make decisions about work. To capture a wider range of student perspectives, in the second part of the study, they will field a student survey to both treatment and control group students.

Control condition

The control condition will be no centralized FWS offer.

Key measures

Confirmatory, or primary, outcomes include year-to-year persistence, and degree completion or transfer in the third year after randomization. Exploratory, or secondary, outcomes include student borrowing and total aid received, enrollment intensity, grade point average, credit accumulation, as well as measures of employment and earnings during and after enrollment.

Data analytic strategy

Researchers will use ordinary least squares regression (OLS) to estimate the ITT and a two-stage least squares approach to estimate the TOT effects of the intervention. The research team will analyze the qualitative and survey data using descriptive methods including analytic coding and OLS regression.

Cost analysis strategy

The cost analysis will use the ingredients method to calculate how much it costs colleges to administer the FWS program. The cost-effectiveness analysis will assess the efficiency of FWS from college-level and federal perspectives.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Meredith Larson

Education Research Analyst
NCER

Project contributors

Thomas Brock

Co-principal investigator

Products and publications

Researchers will produce interim implementation and cost briefs and final impact and cost-effectiveness reports.

Supplemental information

Co-Principal Investigators: Soliz, Adela; Brock, Thomas

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

Education FinancePostsecondary Education

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Blue zoomed in IES logo
Workshop/Training

IES Methods Training in Cost-Effectiveness and Eco...

June 02, 2025
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Request for Applications

Education Research and Development Center Program ...

March 14, 2025
Read More
Blue 3 Placeholder Pattern 1
Request for Applications

Research Training Programs in the Education Scienc...

March 07, 2025
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote