Project Activities
This study will occur in two contexts: 1) Practice-Based Professional Development (PBPD) for literacy coaches and teachers, and 2) teachers' implementation of SRSD in their classrooms under routine conditions. The independent research team will use a large-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the impact the SRSD intervention for 6th grade middle-school students on student writing outcomes.
Structured Abstract
Setting
This project will take place in targeted urban, suburban, and rural middle schools that represent a diverse student sociodemographic population across North Carolina and possibly Virginia.
Sample
The final sample will include 280 English Language Arts (ELA) teachers and 28,000 sixth-grade students. Students will be sampled from 70 schools in 1-2 states. This sample of students will be representative of this region's population in the United States.
SRSD instruction is a structured, disciplined approach for teaching all students specific strategies for writing compositions. Students learn meta-cognitive strategies and procedures for self-regulation to better understand and regulate the writing process. They also learn to set goals, self-monitor, self-instruct, and self-reinforce to support self-regulation of strategy use. PBPD for SRSD is an established PD paradigm used to train teachers in implementing SRSD for persuasive writing. This project also will include Literacy Coaches in order to facilitate implementation and sustainability. The PD will include three days of training for teachers and literacy coaches. In addition to the PD Instructor, Literacy coaches will support teachers' implementation of the SRSD through observations, coaching, and feedback.
Research design and methods
The research team will use a stratified cluster-randomization pre-post design to compare the treatment (SRSD) to the control (BAU) conditions. Schools will be randomized to SRSD and BAU conditions in a 1:1 ratio. Key design elements in the present study include an evaluation conducted by researchers who are neutral with respect to the development, distribution, and financial interests in the proposed SRSD writing intervention and independent from the PD. Schools will selected in Year 1, and students and teachers enrolled over Years 2 through 4. The research team will assess student outcomes prior-to and post treatment. The team will independently assess the fidelity of the PBPD for SRSD during the 3- day training as well as the fidelity of implementation of the treatment and control conditions.
Control condition
Schools in the control condition will use business-as-usual curriculum and professional development typically provided by their local district.
Key measures
Outcome measures will include five scores of writing strategy use (Focus and Meaning, Organization, Content and Development, Language Use and Style, Mechanics and Conventions) using various measures including the Wechsler Individualized Achievement Test IV Essay Composition. Student-level moderators [SPED status, ELL status, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function 2 Screening Form, age, sex, school attendance) and teacher-level moderators [years of experience, specialization, highest degree, Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale-Short, Acceptability of Adaptations Scale (attitude towards teaching writing), Professional Learning Communities Assessment-Revised, Evidence Based Writing Practices questionnaire (prior knowledge of SRSD model)] are included. Mediators include fidelity of implementation for SRSD in Writing using frequency of use as a primary variable of interest.
Data analytic strategy
The research team will use a multilevel design to address research questions about implementation of the SRSD instructional model in the sixth grade and its impacts on students' writing outcomes.
Cost analysis strategy
The researchers will use the ingredients method of cost analysis in order to fully document the economic cost of implementing SRSD in resource utilization or opportunity cost terms. They will gather data on the amount and characteristics of personnel, facilities, materials, and other resources required to produce the measured effect to capture what is needed to replicate implementation in other settings. The team will conduct the cost-effectiveness analysis during Year 5.
People and institutions involved
IES program contact(s)
Project contributors
Products and publications
Products: The research team will produce information on the effectiveness of SRSD for improving writing outcomes under routine classroom conditions. The study also will provide information on the cost-effectiveness of the implementation of the SRSD model. Utilizing a number of communication resources, including a Practice Disseminator, the researchers will disseminate information via peer-reviewed journals, scholarly conferences, professional conferences, and schools.
Related projects
Questions about this project?
To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.
