Project Activities
Middle schools in a suburban setting will be recruited and randomly assigned to either the intervention condition or typical school services. The SCI-A intervention is comprised of five units, each consisting of six 45-minute lessons, delivered via small groups (four to six students per group). The units include: facial expressions, sharing ideas, turn-taking, recognizing feelings/emotions, and problem solving. They also include opportunities for students to practice skills in structured and naturalistic activities. Multiple measures will be used to assess student behavioral and academic outcomes. Researchers will also examine factors that moderate or mediate the impact of the intervention on student outcomes.
Structured Abstract
Setting
The research will take place in 50 middle schools in a suburban setting.
Sample
A total of 300 sixth- through eighth-grade students who have been identified with high-functioning autism or Asperger's syndrome will participate in this project.
Intervention
The SCI-A program was developed using a predominately cognitive-behavior intervention approach with a focus on phenotype-specific target skills designed to promote self-monitoring and self-evaluation. The curriculum is also designed to provide effective scaffolded instruction, building upon each skill, with maintenance of learned skills reinforced throughout by the use of repetition, integration, and feedback as new skills are added. The curricular units utilize a combination of didactic instruction, behavior modeling and rehearsal, and in-vivo practice with their group-mates as a means to teach and/or modify social behavior specific to students' needs. SCI-A includes training guidelines, lesson plans, and instructional materials. It consists of 22 hours of group intervention (four to six students per group) and is comprised of five units, each consisting of six 45-minute lessons. Units are taught in a specific sequence and the lessons within each unit follow a consistent structure of (a) reviewing a previously learned skill and introducing a new skill in an instructional and group discussion format, (b) skill modeling, (c) opportunities to practice the skill in structured and naturalistic activities, and (d) review activity. The units include: facial expressions, sharing ideas, turn-taking, recognizing feelings/emotions, and problem solving.
Research design and methods
This study will use a hierarchical cluster, randomized trial design where schools serve as the unit of randomization. Schools will be randomly assigned to the SCI-A intervention or a business-as-usual comparison group. The immediate and longer-term (i.e., 6 months following intervention) effects of SCI-A will be evaluated.
Control condition
Students in the comparison group will receive instruction and services typically provided in the schools.
Key measures
A variety of measures will be used to assess the impact of the intervention. Students will complete direct assessments of social problem solving and executive functioning, and will complete a neuropsychological assessment of social perception. Direct observations of classroom functioning will provide information regarding student classroom behaviors that rely on underlying abilities in perspective taking, emotion regulation, and executive functioning. The researchers will also administer a research team-developed progress-monitoring measure of student performance on the intervention's five instructional units. Teachers will complete measures of student social communication, social interaction, and executive functioning. In addition, a variety of measures will be used to assess fidelity and acceptability of the intervention.
Data analytic strategy
Multilevel structural equation modeling will be used to analyze the impact of SCI-A on students' social, behavioral, and classroom functioning.
People and institutions involved
IES program contact(s)
Products and publications
Products: The products of this project include evidence of the efficacy of the SCI-A intervention, published reports, and presentations.
Journal article, monograph, or newsletter
Kilgus, S. , Riley-Tillman, T.C., Stichter, J.P., Schoemann, A.M., and Bellesheim, K. (in press). Reliability of Direct Behavior Ratings - Social Competence (DBR-SC) Data: How Many Ratings Are Necessary?. School Psychology Quarterly.
Riley-Tillman, T.C., Stichter, J.P., Kilgus, S., Schoemann, A.M., and Owens, S.A. (under review). Examining the Concurrent Criterion-Related Validity of Direct Behavior Rating Measures of Social Competence. School Psychology Quarterly.
Related projects
Questions about this project?
To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.