Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on ... arrow_forward_ios Evaluation of G ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Evaluation of G ...
Information on ...
Grant Closed

Evaluation of Gifted and Talented Program Practices and Student Outcomes

NCER
Program: Education Research Grants
Program topic(s): Improving Education Systems
Award amount: $1,307,778
Principal investigator: Dan Goldhaber
Awardee:
American Institutes for Research (AIR)
Year: 2018
Award period: 7 years (07/01/2018 - 06/30/2025)
Project type:
Exploration
Award number: R305A180082

Purpose

Research on how best to meet the needs of gifted and talented (GT) students is limited. In states where gifted programming is mandated, schools implement a wide variety of strategies and instructional approaches to accelerate the standard school curriculum and/or provide enriched learning opportunities for advanced students. This project used data from Washington State (approximately 1 million students in 300 districts) to examine the association between GT program features, classroom resources, and student outcomes.

Project Activities

The researchers surveyed all district GT coordinators in the state to capture GT program features and combined these data with state administrative datasets to assess the relationship between GT program features and short- and long-term student outcomes. The researchers also examined mediators and moderators of the relationship, and gave special attention to factors that contribute to the success of minorities and low-income students, who have historically been underrepresented in GT programs.

Structured Abstract

Setting

All K-12 public schools in Washington state (including urban, suburban, and rural).

Sample

Approximately 1 million K-12 public school students (about 60,000, or 5.8%, of whom are identified as gifted) in approximately 300 school districts.

Factors

The researchers examined malleable program features such as classroom structure, student groupings, and resource availability.

Research design and methods

The researchers linked data collected through district surveys to existing state datasets to address the following questions:

  1. How do the education resources available to GT students differ from those available to high-achieving, non-GT students?
  2. How do differences in resources vary by the structure of GT programming?
  3. How do differences in resources vary for underserved populations?
  4. How does participation in GT programs influence students' short- and long-term academic and behavioral outcomes?
  5. How do participation effects vary by GT programming structure and for underserved student populations?
  6. Do changes in classroom resources for GT and non-GT students explain observed effects of participation on student outcomes?

Control condition

The estimation strategy compared the measured performance of students in GT programs to similar, high-achieving students who do not participate in these programs.

Key measures

The researchers measured program structure (e.g. part- or full-time ability grouping), resource variables (e.g., peer achievement, teacher quality, access to advanced courses); and student outcome variables (e.g., standardized test scores, attendance, grades, high school graduation, and college enrollment). They also used student demographic data to examine results by subgroups.

Data analytic strategy

The researchers used a variety of value-added regressions to examine the short- and long-term effects of GT participation as well as mediators/moderators of GT effects. In addition, researchers used a differences-in-differences approach to examine how the introduction of gifted programs affected student achievement.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Corinne Alfeld

Project contributors

Benjamin Backes

Co-principal investigator

James Cowan

Co-principal investigator

Products and publications

The researchers will produce preliminary evidence of potentially promising gifted education program features, peer-reviewed publications, and a research brief.

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

Academic AchievementPolicies and StandardsTeaching

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Zoomed in IES logo
Fact Sheet/Infographic/FAQ

Implementing Stay Interviews as a Teacher Retentio...

Author(s): U.S. Department of Education
Read More
Rectangle Blue 1 Pattern 1
Blog

Helping Educators Address Chronic Absence Through ...

October 27, 2025 by Rebecca Lindgren
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
News

New study snapshot: Full-Service Community Schools...

October 27, 2025 by
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote