Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on IES-Funded Research arrow_forward_ios Financial Aid Nudges: A National Ex ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Financial Aid Nudges: A National Ex ...
Information on IES-Funded Research
Grant Closed

Financial Aid Nudges: A National Experiment to Increase Retention of Financial Aid and College Persistence

NCER
Program: Education Research Grants
Program topic(s): Postsecondary and Adult Education
Award amount: $2,175,114
Principal investigator: Sara Goldrick-Rab
Awardee:
Temple University
Year: 2016
Project type:
Efficacy
Award number: R305A160400

Purpose

In this project, researchers investigate whether an intervention that provides financial aid information, reminders, and advising to college students increases completion of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) and compliance with the Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) requirements of the Pell grant program. The research team will convey information, reminders, and offers of additional assistance to students via text message. The intervention is expected to work by making students aware of crucial financial aid and SAP requirements, along with the financial benefits of complying with these requirements. First-generation students with less access to college-going information, as well as students who are working or have dependents, are expected to benefit the most from the intervention, as a consequence of substantial increases in their knowledge of requirements and/or re-shaping of their immediate priorities. If proven beneficial, the intervention could be replicated as a cost-effective strategy for institutions and state systems to transmit crucial policy information from administrators to students, and to provide personalized advising for students who need it.

Project Activities

During the first stage of the project, researchers will randomize eligible students to the two treatment conditions and the control condition. After that, during the 2016–17 academic year, researchers will administer the intervention in two forms to equally-sized groups of students. The first group of students will receive information and reminders pertaining to financial aid and SAP requirements; the second group of students will receive the same information and reminders, plus the offer to interact with an online college advisor. After implementing the intervention, researchers will analyze its impacts on FAFSA filing, college enrollment, and degree completion, and will compare impacts across key student groups.

Structured Abstract

Setting

This project will take place at community colleges and 4-year institutions spread out across the United States.

Sample

Approximately 8,700 first-, second-, and third-year students at 2-year and 4-year postsecondary institutions will participate in the study. The research team will draw the sample from students participating in the National Postsecondary Student Aid Study of 2016 (NPSAS:16) who were interviewed at the time when they were recruited for NPSAS:16, and who agreed to participate in additional data collections associated with NPSAS:16. The sample will represent U.S. college students in their first three years of college who completed a FAFSA in the year previous to this study.
Intervention
The intervention combines detailed information on financial aid and SAP requirements with "nudges" (reminders) to complete key tasks before their deadlines and personalized assistance via an online advisor. All students in the treatment group will receive information and reminders, and a subset will be offered the opportunity to receive additional assistance from an online advisor who will be available via text message, email, and telephone. The information will consist of facts about the requirements and benefits of completing a FAFSA and complying with SAP requirements. Researchers will deliver the "nudges" to students at key points in the FAFSA filing timeline, encouraging them to complete well-defined tasks in advance of deadlines that have implications for their receipt of aid. Advising will be delivered by College Possible, a non-profit provider of college-going supports for low-income students.

Research design and methods

Researchers will randomize students to two treatment and one control condition, with each of the treatment conditions comprising 40 percent of the sample, and the control condition comprising 20 percent of the sample. One treatment group will receive information and nudges, another will receive information and nudges plus assistance from an advisor, and the control group will not receive any information or services included in the intervention. The randomized design will facilitate causal estimates of the two treatment impacts in relation to the control condition, and in relation to each other.

Control condition

Students in the control condition will receive the business-as-usual college-going information and reminders provided by their institutions and relevant agencies including the U.S. Department of Education.

Key measures

Researchers are concerned with two sets of outcome measures. They will track FAFSA filing and the composition of students' financial aid packages (i.e. grants versus loans) using data from the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). They will construct college enrollment, persistence, and degree completion outcomes with enrollment and completion data from the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC). Researchers will measure fidelity of implementation for the intervention by keeping track of the number of students with active cell phone numbers who are therefore capable of receiving text messages, and by monitoring advisors' responses to students' requests for assistance. Potential moderators of the intervention such as a student's year in college, the family members' college attainment, work involvement, and number of dependents, will come from NPSAS:16.

Data analytic strategy

Researchers will employ a linear regression with binary treatment measures to assess whether treatment impacts differ significantly from baseline (the control condition). To assess whether the two treatment impacts differ significantly from each other, researchers will employ a post-hoc linear hypothesis test. To assess whether either or both of the treatment impacts differ significantly for specific sub-groups of students or across institutional contexts (i.e. 2- and 4-year colleges) the research team will estimate parameters based on interaction terms that combine the treatment indicators with the sub-group measure of interest.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Benson, James

Products and publications

Products: Researchers will produce evidence of the efficacy of this intervention for U.S. college students at community colleges and four-year institutions, and a variety of non-technical policy briefs to convey their findings to policymakers and administrators. The researchers will also produce peer-reviewed publications.

ERIC Citations: Find available citations in ERIC for this award here.

Supplemental information

Co-Principal Investigators: Castleman, Benjamin; Page, Lindsay; Sacerdote, Bruce

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

Education TechnologyPolicies and StandardsAcademic AchievementPostsecondary Education

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Zoomed in IES logo
Workshop/Training

Data Science Methods for Digital Learning Platform...

August 18, 2025
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Workshop/Training

Meta-Analysis Training Institute (MATI)

July 28, 2025
Read More
Rectangle Blue 1 Pattern 1
Workshop/Training

Summer Research Training Institute on Cluster-Rand...

July 14, 2025
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote